加强跨学科英语学习:系统回顾 HyFlex 模式的策略、挑战和影响

Guanzheng Chen, Ningyi Lai
{"title":"加强跨学科英语学习:系统回顾 HyFlex 模式的策略、挑战和影响","authors":"Guanzheng Chen, Ningyi Lai","doi":"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review offers a thorough analysis of the existing research on the utilization of the HyFlex (Hybrid-Flexible) learning model in interdisciplinary English courses. Drawing insights from 24 empirical studies published from 2008 to 2023, the review aims to showcase successful tactics for enhancing the HyFlex methodology while pinpointing notable deficiencies in its integration within the context of interdisciplinary English education. The review reveals promising strategies, such as leveraging peer interactions, utilizing authentic assessments, and implementing discipline-specific guidelines. However, it also uncovers critical gaps, including insufficient research on the model's effectiveness, a lack of frameworks for assessing higher-order skills, and challenges in facilitating meaningful discourse across modes. The review further highlights the need for more robust faculty training, consistent institutional support, and greater accessibility and inclusiveness for diverse student populations. To address these gaps, the review recommends the development of comprehensive assessment frameworks, investment in faculty training, integration of work-integrated learning, and implementation of blended synchronous approaches. By addressing these areas, the HyFlex model can be optimized to create more inclusive, flexible, and effective learning environments for students in interdisciplinary English courses. This review provides a solid foundation for understanding the current research landscape and identifies key areas for future development, offering valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":262869,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","volume":"54 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Interdisciplinary English Learning: A Systematic Review of the HyFlex Model's Strategies, Challenges, and Implications\",\"authors\":\"Guanzheng Chen, Ningyi Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review offers a thorough analysis of the existing research on the utilization of the HyFlex (Hybrid-Flexible) learning model in interdisciplinary English courses. Drawing insights from 24 empirical studies published from 2008 to 2023, the review aims to showcase successful tactics for enhancing the HyFlex methodology while pinpointing notable deficiencies in its integration within the context of interdisciplinary English education. The review reveals promising strategies, such as leveraging peer interactions, utilizing authentic assessments, and implementing discipline-specific guidelines. However, it also uncovers critical gaps, including insufficient research on the model's effectiveness, a lack of frameworks for assessing higher-order skills, and challenges in facilitating meaningful discourse across modes. The review further highlights the need for more robust faculty training, consistent institutional support, and greater accessibility and inclusiveness for diverse student populations. To address these gaps, the review recommends the development of comprehensive assessment frameworks, investment in faculty training, integration of work-integrated learning, and implementation of blended synchronous approaches. By addressing these areas, the HyFlex model can be optimized to create more inclusive, flexible, and effective learning environments for students in interdisciplinary English courses. This review provides a solid foundation for understanding the current research landscape and identifies key areas for future development, offering valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"54 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i61388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统性综述全面分析了跨学科英语课程中使用 HyFlex(混合-灵活)学习模式的现有研究。综述从 2008 年至 2023 年间发表的 24 项实证研究中汲取灵感,旨在展示加强 HyFlex 方法的成功策略,同时指出在跨学科英语教育背景下整合 HyFlex 方法的显著缺陷。综述揭示了一些大有可为的策略,如利用同伴互动、使用真实评估和实施特定学科指南。不过,它也发现了一些关键的不足之处,包括对该模式有效性的研究不足、缺乏评估高阶技能的框架,以及在促进跨模式有意义对话方面的挑战。审查进一步强调,需要更有力的教师培训、持续的机构支持,以及对不同学生群体更大的可及性和包容性。为了弥补这些差距,审查建议制定全面的评估框架,投资于教师培训,整合工作一体化学习,以及实施混合同步方法。通过解决这些方面的问题,可以优化 HyFlex 模式,为跨学科英语课程的学生创造更加包容、灵活和有效的学习环境。本综述为了解当前的研究状况奠定了坚实的基础,并确定了未来发展的关键领域,为教育工作者、政策制定者和研究人员提供了宝贵的见解,以提高学生的参与度和学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Interdisciplinary English Learning: A Systematic Review of the HyFlex Model's Strategies, Challenges, and Implications
This systematic review offers a thorough analysis of the existing research on the utilization of the HyFlex (Hybrid-Flexible) learning model in interdisciplinary English courses. Drawing insights from 24 empirical studies published from 2008 to 2023, the review aims to showcase successful tactics for enhancing the HyFlex methodology while pinpointing notable deficiencies in its integration within the context of interdisciplinary English education. The review reveals promising strategies, such as leveraging peer interactions, utilizing authentic assessments, and implementing discipline-specific guidelines. However, it also uncovers critical gaps, including insufficient research on the model's effectiveness, a lack of frameworks for assessing higher-order skills, and challenges in facilitating meaningful discourse across modes. The review further highlights the need for more robust faculty training, consistent institutional support, and greater accessibility and inclusiveness for diverse student populations. To address these gaps, the review recommends the development of comprehensive assessment frameworks, investment in faculty training, integration of work-integrated learning, and implementation of blended synchronous approaches. By addressing these areas, the HyFlex model can be optimized to create more inclusive, flexible, and effective learning environments for students in interdisciplinary English courses. This review provides a solid foundation for understanding the current research landscape and identifies key areas for future development, offering valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信