地塞米松在恶性小肠梗阻治疗中的应用和效果

Frank F. Yang, Elina Serrano, Kyle S. Bilodeau, Michael Weykamp, Caitlin J. Silvestri, Ashleigh C. M. Bull, Brenda Lin, Sara L. Schaefer, Colette Galet, Luis J. Garcia, Baraka Gitonga, D. T. Kolodziej, Samantha Esposito, Molly Parker-Brigham, Rohan Luhar, Avinash Mamgain, Kendrick C. Brown, S. Dewdney, T. Price, N. Siparsky, Sarah Knerr, Pauline K. Park, Sabrina Sanchez, D. Skeete, K. Fischkoff, D. Flum
{"title":"地塞米松在恶性小肠梗阻治疗中的应用和效果","authors":"Frank F. Yang, Elina Serrano, Kyle S. Bilodeau, Michael Weykamp, Caitlin J. Silvestri, Ashleigh C. M. Bull, Brenda Lin, Sara L. Schaefer, Colette Galet, Luis J. Garcia, Baraka Gitonga, D. T. Kolodziej, Samantha Esposito, Molly Parker-Brigham, Rohan Luhar, Avinash Mamgain, Kendrick C. Brown, S. Dewdney, T. Price, N. Siparsky, Sarah Knerr, Pauline K. Park, Sabrina Sanchez, D. Skeete, K. Fischkoff, D. Flum","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To describe rates of dexamethasone use in the nonoperative management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) and their outcomes.\n \n \n \n mSBO is common in patients with advanced abdominal-pelvic cancers. Management includes prioritizing quality of life and avoiding surgical intervention when possible. The use of dexamethasone to restore bowel function is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for mSBO. Yet, it is unknown how often dexamethasone is used for mSBO and whether results from nonresearch settings support its use.\n \n \n \n This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study including unique admissions for mSBO from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Dexamethasone use and management outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression.\n \n \n \n Among 571 admissions (68% female, mean age 63 years, 85% history of abdominal surgery) that were eligible and initially nonoperative, 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23%–30%] received dexamethasone treatment (69% female, mean age 62 years, 87% history of abdominal surgery). Dexamethasone use by site ranged from 13% to 52%. Among dexamethasone recipients, 13% (95% CI = 9%–20%) subsequently required nonelective surgery during the same admission and 4 dexamethasone-related safety-events were reported. Amongst 421 eligible admissions where dexamethasone was not used, 17% (95% CI = 14%–21%) required nonelective surgery. Overall, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonelective surgery with dexamethasone use compared to without its use was 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4–1.3). Using multiple logistic regression, OR after adjusting for site, age, sex, history of abdominal surgery, nasogastric tube, and Gastrografin use was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3–1.1).\n \n \n \n Dexamethasone was used in about 1 in 4 eligible mSBO admissions with high variability of use between tertiary academic centers. This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggested an association between dexamethasone use and lower rates of nonelective surgery, representing a potential opportunity for quality improvement.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use and Outcomes of Dexamethasone in the Management of Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction\",\"authors\":\"Frank F. Yang, Elina Serrano, Kyle S. Bilodeau, Michael Weykamp, Caitlin J. Silvestri, Ashleigh C. M. Bull, Brenda Lin, Sara L. Schaefer, Colette Galet, Luis J. Garcia, Baraka Gitonga, D. T. Kolodziej, Samantha Esposito, Molly Parker-Brigham, Rohan Luhar, Avinash Mamgain, Kendrick C. Brown, S. Dewdney, T. Price, N. Siparsky, Sarah Knerr, Pauline K. Park, Sabrina Sanchez, D. Skeete, K. Fischkoff, D. Flum\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/as9.0000000000000431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To describe rates of dexamethasone use in the nonoperative management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) and their outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n mSBO is common in patients with advanced abdominal-pelvic cancers. Management includes prioritizing quality of life and avoiding surgical intervention when possible. The use of dexamethasone to restore bowel function is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for mSBO. Yet, it is unknown how often dexamethasone is used for mSBO and whether results from nonresearch settings support its use.\\n \\n \\n \\n This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study including unique admissions for mSBO from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Dexamethasone use and management outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression.\\n \\n \\n \\n Among 571 admissions (68% female, mean age 63 years, 85% history of abdominal surgery) that were eligible and initially nonoperative, 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23%–30%] received dexamethasone treatment (69% female, mean age 62 years, 87% history of abdominal surgery). Dexamethasone use by site ranged from 13% to 52%. Among dexamethasone recipients, 13% (95% CI = 9%–20%) subsequently required nonelective surgery during the same admission and 4 dexamethasone-related safety-events were reported. Amongst 421 eligible admissions where dexamethasone was not used, 17% (95% CI = 14%–21%) required nonelective surgery. Overall, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonelective surgery with dexamethasone use compared to without its use was 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4–1.3). Using multiple logistic regression, OR after adjusting for site, age, sex, history of abdominal surgery, nasogastric tube, and Gastrografin use was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3–1.1).\\n \\n \\n \\n Dexamethasone was used in about 1 in 4 eligible mSBO admissions with high variability of use between tertiary academic centers. This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggested an association between dexamethasone use and lower rates of nonelective surgery, representing a potential opportunity for quality improvement.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述地塞米松在恶性小肠梗阻(mSBO)非手术治疗中的使用率及其结果。处理方法包括优先考虑生活质量,尽可能避免手术干预。美国国家综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)的 mSBO 指南推荐使用地塞米松来恢复肠道功能。然而,目前尚不清楚地塞米松在 mSBO 中的使用频率,以及非研究机构的结果是否支持使用地塞米松。 这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,包括2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间因mSBO入院的独特病例。通过描述性统计和多元逻辑回归总结了地塞米松的使用情况和管理结果。 在符合条件且最初未进行手术的 571 例入院患者(68% 为女性,平均年龄 63 岁,85% 有腹部手术史)中,26% [95% 置信区间 (CI) = 23%-30%] 接受了地塞米松治疗(69% 为女性,平均年龄 62 岁,87% 有腹部手术史)。地塞米松在不同部位的使用率从 13% 到 52% 不等。在接受地塞米松治疗的患者中,有13%(95% CI = 9%-20%)随后需要在同一次入院过程中进行非选择性手术,并报告了4起与地塞米松相关的安全事件。在421例未使用地塞米松的合格入院患者中,17%(95% CI = 14%-21%)需要进行非选择性手术。总体而言,使用地塞米松与未使用地塞米松相比,非选择性手术的未调整几率比(OR)为 0.7(95% CI = 0.4-1.3)。通过多元逻辑回归,在调整了手术部位、年龄、性别、腹部手术史、鼻胃管和 Gastrografin 的使用后,OR 为 0.6(95% CI = 0.3-1.1)。 大约每 4 例符合条件的 mSBO 住院患者中就有 1 例使用地塞米松,而各三级学术中心使用地塞米松的情况差异很大。这项多中心回顾性队列研究表明,地塞米松的使用与非选择性手术率较低之间存在关联,这为提高质量提供了潜在的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use and Outcomes of Dexamethasone in the Management of Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction
To describe rates of dexamethasone use in the nonoperative management of malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) and their outcomes. mSBO is common in patients with advanced abdominal-pelvic cancers. Management includes prioritizing quality of life and avoiding surgical intervention when possible. The use of dexamethasone to restore bowel function is recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for mSBO. Yet, it is unknown how often dexamethasone is used for mSBO and whether results from nonresearch settings support its use. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study including unique admissions for mSBO from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Dexamethasone use and management outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression. Among 571 admissions (68% female, mean age 63 years, 85% history of abdominal surgery) that were eligible and initially nonoperative, 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 23%–30%] received dexamethasone treatment (69% female, mean age 62 years, 87% history of abdominal surgery). Dexamethasone use by site ranged from 13% to 52%. Among dexamethasone recipients, 13% (95% CI = 9%–20%) subsequently required nonelective surgery during the same admission and 4 dexamethasone-related safety-events were reported. Amongst 421 eligible admissions where dexamethasone was not used, 17% (95% CI = 14%–21%) required nonelective surgery. Overall, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for nonelective surgery with dexamethasone use compared to without its use was 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4–1.3). Using multiple logistic regression, OR after adjusting for site, age, sex, history of abdominal surgery, nasogastric tube, and Gastrografin use was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3–1.1). Dexamethasone was used in about 1 in 4 eligible mSBO admissions with high variability of use between tertiary academic centers. This multicenter retrospective cohort study suggested an association between dexamethasone use and lower rates of nonelective surgery, representing a potential opportunity for quality improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信