斯里兰卡国家传染病研究所实验室分析前误差的鉴定

P. D. Koggalage, M. P. G. D. Madhubhashini, D. U. Abeysinghe, G. R. D. M. Abeywickrama
{"title":"斯里兰卡国家传染病研究所实验室分析前误差的鉴定","authors":"P. D. Koggalage, M. P. G. D. Madhubhashini, D. U. Abeysinghe, G. R. D. M. Abeywickrama","doi":"10.4038/sljma.v24i2.5424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laboratory investigations are the backbone of the diagnosis of diseases. Previous studies have shown that more than 70% of clinical laboratory specimens have to be rejected due to pre-analytical errors.Objective: To determine the sample error rate and identify the causes of sample errors to prevent pre-analytical errors on a laboratory basis.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Details were recorded on a data sheet from the received blood samples which were rejected. Sample rejection criteria were described using a formula.Results: The overall sample rejection rate was found to be 71.15%. Incomplete request forms accounted for 54.2% of sample rejections for biochemical samples, while mislabelled blood samples accounted for 35.1% of sample rejections for complete blood counts.Conclusion: According to the study findings, it has shown that relevant healthcare workers should pay more attention to patient investigations relevant to blood samples to provide appropriate patient management with minimal errors in investigation reports.","PeriodicalId":197325,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Medical Administration","volume":"35 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Pre-analytical Errors in the Laboratory of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"P. D. Koggalage, M. P. G. D. Madhubhashini, D. U. Abeysinghe, G. R. D. M. Abeywickrama\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljma.v24i2.5424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Laboratory investigations are the backbone of the diagnosis of diseases. Previous studies have shown that more than 70% of clinical laboratory specimens have to be rejected due to pre-analytical errors.Objective: To determine the sample error rate and identify the causes of sample errors to prevent pre-analytical errors on a laboratory basis.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Details were recorded on a data sheet from the received blood samples which were rejected. Sample rejection criteria were described using a formula.Results: The overall sample rejection rate was found to be 71.15%. Incomplete request forms accounted for 54.2% of sample rejections for biochemical samples, while mislabelled blood samples accounted for 35.1% of sample rejections for complete blood counts.Conclusion: According to the study findings, it has shown that relevant healthcare workers should pay more attention to patient investigations relevant to blood samples to provide appropriate patient management with minimal errors in investigation reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Medical Administration\",\"volume\":\"35 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lankan Journal of Medical Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljma.v24i2.5424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Medical Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljma.v24i2.5424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实验室检查是诊断疾病的基础。以往的研究表明,70%以上的临床实验室标本因分析前误差而被拒收:方法:这是一项横断面研究:这是一项横断面研究。方法:这是一项横断面研究。在数据表上记录了收到的被拒收的血液样本的详细信息。用公式描述了样品拒收标准:结果:总体样本拒收率为 71.15%。不完整的申请表占生化样本拒收率的 54.2%,而贴错标签的血液样本占全血计数样本拒收率的 35.1%:研究结果表明,相关医护人员应更加重视与血液样本相关的患者调查,以便在提供适当的患者管理的同时,尽量减少调查报告中的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Pre-analytical Errors in the Laboratory of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Sri Lanka
Background: Laboratory investigations are the backbone of the diagnosis of diseases. Previous studies have shown that more than 70% of clinical laboratory specimens have to be rejected due to pre-analytical errors.Objective: To determine the sample error rate and identify the causes of sample errors to prevent pre-analytical errors on a laboratory basis.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Details were recorded on a data sheet from the received blood samples which were rejected. Sample rejection criteria were described using a formula.Results: The overall sample rejection rate was found to be 71.15%. Incomplete request forms accounted for 54.2% of sample rejections for biochemical samples, while mislabelled blood samples accounted for 35.1% of sample rejections for complete blood counts.Conclusion: According to the study findings, it has shown that relevant healthcare workers should pay more attention to patient investigations relevant to blood samples to provide appropriate patient management with minimal errors in investigation reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信