模拟心肺检查技能检查表:评分者间可靠性评估

Rachel Pata, Sara O'Sullivan, Danielle Peterson, Laura Superchi, Richard Feinn
{"title":"模拟心肺检查技能检查表:评分者间可靠性评估","authors":"Rachel Pata, Sara O'Sullivan, Danielle Peterson, Laura Superchi, Richard Feinn","doi":"10.1097/cpt.0000000000000251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Experiential learning using high-fidelity simulation is a valuable tool for teaching Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students the cardiopulmonary examination. There are currently no standardized assessment tools to evaluate student performance and provide feedback on these skills. The cardiovascular and pulmonary section of the American Physical Therapy Association recently published recommended competency levels for entry-level physical therapists including examination skills. The primary aim of this study was to create and assess inter-rater reliability of a cardiopulmonary examination skills checklist that aligns with these recommendations and can be used in the simulation environment.\n \n \n \n A skills checklist with 6 sections was developed to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination within a high-fidelity simulation experience. Training videos on the cardiopulmonary examination and checklist use were created and given to 3 graders. Seventy-three DPT students performed the cardiopulmonary examination within simulation while being recorded. Three graders then assessed the same 25 randomly selected videos using the checklist. Inter-rater reliability, item % agreement and student performance were analyzed.\n \n \n \n The overall interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the checklist was calculated to be 0.858, demonstrating strong agreement between graders. The ICC for individualized checklist sections ranged from 0.659 to 0.960, demonstrating good to near perfect agreement. The average percent correct achieved by students was 80.48 (6.91%), R = 65% to 93.33%. There were >80% agreement for 55/60 items and >90% agreement for 44/60 items.\n \n \n \n The checklist provided an effective tool to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination and demonstrated consistent scoring between graders.\n","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"32 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Pata, Sara O'Sullivan, Danielle Peterson, Laura Superchi, Richard Feinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/cpt.0000000000000251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Experiential learning using high-fidelity simulation is a valuable tool for teaching Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students the cardiopulmonary examination. There are currently no standardized assessment tools to evaluate student performance and provide feedback on these skills. The cardiovascular and pulmonary section of the American Physical Therapy Association recently published recommended competency levels for entry-level physical therapists including examination skills. The primary aim of this study was to create and assess inter-rater reliability of a cardiopulmonary examination skills checklist that aligns with these recommendations and can be used in the simulation environment.\\n \\n \\n \\n A skills checklist with 6 sections was developed to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination within a high-fidelity simulation experience. Training videos on the cardiopulmonary examination and checklist use were created and given to 3 graders. Seventy-three DPT students performed the cardiopulmonary examination within simulation while being recorded. Three graders then assessed the same 25 randomly selected videos using the checklist. Inter-rater reliability, item % agreement and student performance were analyzed.\\n \\n \\n \\n The overall interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the checklist was calculated to be 0.858, demonstrating strong agreement between graders. The ICC for individualized checklist sections ranged from 0.659 to 0.960, demonstrating good to near perfect agreement. The average percent correct achieved by students was 80.48 (6.91%), R = 65% to 93.33%. There were >80% agreement for 55/60 items and >90% agreement for 44/60 items.\\n \\n \\n \\n The checklist provided an effective tool to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination and demonstrated consistent scoring between graders.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":72526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal\",\"volume\":\"32 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpt.0000000000000251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpt.0000000000000251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用高仿真模拟进行体验式学习是教授物理治疗博士(DPT)学生心肺检查的重要工具。目前还没有标准化的评估工具来评估学生的表现并提供有关这些技能的反馈。美国物理治疗协会心血管和肺部分会最近公布了入门级物理治疗师的能力水平建议,其中包括检查技能。本研究的主要目的是创建和评估符合这些建议并可在模拟环境中使用的心肺检查技能核对表的互评可靠性。 我们开发了一份包含 6 个部分的技能检查表,用于评估学生在高保真模拟体验中的心肺检查表现。制作了心肺检查和核对表使用的培训视频,并提供给 3 名评分员。73 名 DPT 学生在模拟中进行了心肺检查,同时进行了录像。然后,三名评分员使用核对表对随机抽取的 25 个相同视频进行评估。对评分者之间的信度、项目一致性和学生表现进行了分析。 经计算,检查表的总体类间相关系数(ICC)为 0.858,表明评分者之间的一致性很高。个别检查表部分的 ICC 在 0.659 至 0.960 之间,显示出良好至接近完美的一致性。学生的平均正确率为 80.48 (6.91%),R = 65% 至 93.33%。在 55/60 个项目中,同意率大于 80%,在 44/60 个项目中,同意率大于 90%。 该核对表为评估学生的心肺检查成绩提供了有效的工具,并显示出评分者之间评分的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability
Experiential learning using high-fidelity simulation is a valuable tool for teaching Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students the cardiopulmonary examination. There are currently no standardized assessment tools to evaluate student performance and provide feedback on these skills. The cardiovascular and pulmonary section of the American Physical Therapy Association recently published recommended competency levels for entry-level physical therapists including examination skills. The primary aim of this study was to create and assess inter-rater reliability of a cardiopulmonary examination skills checklist that aligns with these recommendations and can be used in the simulation environment. A skills checklist with 6 sections was developed to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination within a high-fidelity simulation experience. Training videos on the cardiopulmonary examination and checklist use were created and given to 3 graders. Seventy-three DPT students performed the cardiopulmonary examination within simulation while being recorded. Three graders then assessed the same 25 randomly selected videos using the checklist. Inter-rater reliability, item % agreement and student performance were analyzed. The overall interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the checklist was calculated to be 0.858, demonstrating strong agreement between graders. The ICC for individualized checklist sections ranged from 0.659 to 0.960, demonstrating good to near perfect agreement. The average percent correct achieved by students was 80.48 (6.91%), R = 65% to 93.33%. There were >80% agreement for 55/60 items and >90% agreement for 44/60 items. The checklist provided an effective tool to assess student performance on the cardiopulmonary examination and demonstrated consistent scoring between graders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信