患者对系统性银屑病治疗模式的偏好 - 一项定性研究

Q3 Medicine
Mallory L. Zaino, Emily Parks, Jasmine McNeil, S. Feldman
{"title":"患者对系统性银屑病治疗模式的偏好 - 一项定性研究","authors":"Mallory L. Zaino, Emily Parks, Jasmine McNeil, S. Feldman","doi":"10.1177/24755303241253200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment with pathogenesis-directed biologics and oral systemic drugs have made complete clearance of psoriasis a realistic expectation for many patients with psoriasis. Patients’ preferences among these treatments varies. To understand factors impacting psoriasis patients’preferences for injection vs oral medication. Psoriasis patients who receive systemic psoriasis treatment were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. Sample size was based on achieving saturation with equal number of patients preferring oral vs injectable medications to ensure equal representation of both groups. Qualitative analysis was performed to interpret the results. Twenty-two patients participated in the study, 12 males and 10 females. Ten patients were receiving oral medication (apremilast or methotrexate) and 12 patients were receiving injectables (guselkumab, adalimumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, or tildrakizumab) due to self-reported preference. Five themes resulted from the analysis: patients receiving injectables more frequently discussed the positive impact of the medication on quality of life compared to patients on oral medication; fear of side effects, particularly fear of immunosuppression, is associated with injection medications; avoidance of needles drives patients away from injection medication and towards oral systemic medication; patients prioritize convenience when selecting systemic therapy, though the definition of convenience is subject to perception; and patients value the medication recommendation of the physician, regardless of the route of administration. Improving medication adherence and disease outcomes through individualized treatment plans, with an emphasis on patients’ preferences using a shared decision-making approach, may be helpful.","PeriodicalId":36656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","volume":"6 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients’ Preferences Regarding Modes of Systemic Psoriasis Treatment – A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Mallory L. Zaino, Emily Parks, Jasmine McNeil, S. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24755303241253200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Treatment with pathogenesis-directed biologics and oral systemic drugs have made complete clearance of psoriasis a realistic expectation for many patients with psoriasis. Patients’ preferences among these treatments varies. To understand factors impacting psoriasis patients’preferences for injection vs oral medication. Psoriasis patients who receive systemic psoriasis treatment were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. Sample size was based on achieving saturation with equal number of patients preferring oral vs injectable medications to ensure equal representation of both groups. Qualitative analysis was performed to interpret the results. Twenty-two patients participated in the study, 12 males and 10 females. Ten patients were receiving oral medication (apremilast or methotrexate) and 12 patients were receiving injectables (guselkumab, adalimumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, or tildrakizumab) due to self-reported preference. Five themes resulted from the analysis: patients receiving injectables more frequently discussed the positive impact of the medication on quality of life compared to patients on oral medication; fear of side effects, particularly fear of immunosuppression, is associated with injection medications; avoidance of needles drives patients away from injection medication and towards oral systemic medication; patients prioritize convenience when selecting systemic therapy, though the definition of convenience is subject to perception; and patients value the medication recommendation of the physician, regardless of the route of administration. Improving medication adherence and disease outcomes through individualized treatment plans, with an emphasis on patients’ preferences using a shared decision-making approach, may be helpful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303241253200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24755303241253200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发病机制导向型生物制剂和口服系统性药物的治疗使银屑病完全痊愈成为许多银屑病患者的现实期望。患者对这些治疗方法的偏好各不相同。了解影响银屑病患者选择注射还是口服药物的因素。我们邀请接受系统性银屑病治疗的银屑病患者参加半结构化访谈。样本量以达到饱和为基础,其中口服药物与注射药物的患者人数相等,以确保两组患者的代表性相等。对结果进行了定性分析。22 名患者参与了研究,其中男性 12 人,女性 10 人。10名患者接受口服药物(阿普瑞米拉司特或甲氨蝶呤),12名患者根据自我报告的偏好接受注射药物(古谢库单抗、阿达木单抗、利桑单抗、secukinumab、ixekizumab或tildrakizumab)。分析得出了五个主题:与口服药物的患者相比,接受注射药物治疗的患者更常讨论药物对生活质量的积极影响;注射药物与患者对副作用的恐惧有关,尤其是对免疫抑制的恐惧;对针头的恐惧驱使患者放弃注射药物治疗,转而接受口服系统性药物治疗;患者在选择系统性治疗时优先考虑方便性,但方便性的定义取决于患者的认知;无论用药途径如何,患者都重视医生的用药建议。通过个体化治疗计划改善用药依从性和疾病治疗效果可能会有所帮助,这种治疗计划强调采用共同决策的方法满足患者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients’ Preferences Regarding Modes of Systemic Psoriasis Treatment – A Qualitative Study
Treatment with pathogenesis-directed biologics and oral systemic drugs have made complete clearance of psoriasis a realistic expectation for many patients with psoriasis. Patients’ preferences among these treatments varies. To understand factors impacting psoriasis patients’preferences for injection vs oral medication. Psoriasis patients who receive systemic psoriasis treatment were asked to participate in a semi-structured interview. Sample size was based on achieving saturation with equal number of patients preferring oral vs injectable medications to ensure equal representation of both groups. Qualitative analysis was performed to interpret the results. Twenty-two patients participated in the study, 12 males and 10 females. Ten patients were receiving oral medication (apremilast or methotrexate) and 12 patients were receiving injectables (guselkumab, adalimumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, or tildrakizumab) due to self-reported preference. Five themes resulted from the analysis: patients receiving injectables more frequently discussed the positive impact of the medication on quality of life compared to patients on oral medication; fear of side effects, particularly fear of immunosuppression, is associated with injection medications; avoidance of needles drives patients away from injection medication and towards oral systemic medication; patients prioritize convenience when selecting systemic therapy, though the definition of convenience is subject to perception; and patients value the medication recommendation of the physician, regardless of the route of administration. Improving medication adherence and disease outcomes through individualized treatment plans, with an emphasis on patients’ preferences using a shared decision-making approach, may be helpful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信