肿瘤科护士对高度警戒药物的管理和规范的认识

Shifra Aziz, Humaira Saddique, Syeda Sidra Tasneem
{"title":"肿瘤科护士对高度警戒药物的管理和规范的认识","authors":"Shifra Aziz, Humaira Saddique, Syeda Sidra Tasneem","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: High alert medications (HAMs) are associated with a higher risk of causing significant patient harm when used in error. Understanding the administration and regulation of these medications within oncology settings is critical due to the complex nature of cancer treatment regimens and the severity of potential medication errors.\nObjective: To assess the knowledge of nurses regarding the administration and regulation of high alert medications in an oncology department of a tertiary care hospital.\nMethods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 133 registered nurses in the oncology department of Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire designed to evaluate nurses' knowledge of HAMs. Participants included both male (29.3%) and female (70.7%) nurses, with varying educational backgrounds and work experiences. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, focusing on descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.\nResults: The results revealed moderate knowledge levels among nurses with significant gaps in critical areas. Only 20.3% correctly identified the protocol for fast IV push of 1:1000 epinephrine in mild allergic reactions, and 33.8% mistakenly believed that 10% calcium gluconate and 10% calcium chloride were interchangeable. Additionally, 44.4% incorrectly used 'Amp' or 'Vial' for dose expression instead of 'mg' or 'gm', and 53.4% failed to recognize the importance of distinctive labeling on look-alike drugs.\nConclusion: The study highlights the need for enhanced educational programs and standardized protocols to improve the safe administration and regulation of HAMs in oncology settings. Strengthening nurses' knowledge and practices regarding HAMs is essential to reduce medication errors and improve patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge about Administration and Regulation of High Alert Medication among Nurses in Oncology Department\",\"authors\":\"Shifra Aziz, Humaira Saddique, Syeda Sidra Tasneem\",\"doi\":\"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: High alert medications (HAMs) are associated with a higher risk of causing significant patient harm when used in error. Understanding the administration and regulation of these medications within oncology settings is critical due to the complex nature of cancer treatment regimens and the severity of potential medication errors.\\nObjective: To assess the knowledge of nurses regarding the administration and regulation of high alert medications in an oncology department of a tertiary care hospital.\\nMethods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 133 registered nurses in the oncology department of Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire designed to evaluate nurses' knowledge of HAMs. Participants included both male (29.3%) and female (70.7%) nurses, with varying educational backgrounds and work experiences. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, focusing on descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.\\nResults: The results revealed moderate knowledge levels among nurses with significant gaps in critical areas. Only 20.3% correctly identified the protocol for fast IV push of 1:1000 epinephrine in mild allergic reactions, and 33.8% mistakenly believed that 10% calcium gluconate and 10% calcium chloride were interchangeable. Additionally, 44.4% incorrectly used 'Amp' or 'Vial' for dose expression instead of 'mg' or 'gm', and 53.4% failed to recognize the importance of distinctive labeling on look-alike drugs.\\nConclusion: The study highlights the need for enhanced educational programs and standardized protocols to improve the safe administration and regulation of HAMs in oncology settings. Strengthening nurses' knowledge and practices regarding HAMs is essential to reduce medication errors and improve patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高警戒药物(HAMs)一旦使用不当,对患者造成重大伤害的风险较高。由于癌症治疗方案的复杂性和潜在用药错误的严重性,了解肿瘤科对这些药物的管理和规范至关重要:评估一家三甲医院肿瘤科护士对高警戒药物的管理和规范的了解程度:对拉合尔真纳医院肿瘤科的 133 名注册护士进行了描述性横断面研究。研究采用结构化问卷收集数据,旨在评估护士对 HAMs 的了解程度。参与者包括男性(29.3%)和女性(70.7%)护士,他们的教育背景和工作经验各不相同。统计分析使用 SPSS 25 版本进行,侧重于描述性统计,如频率、百分比、平均值和标准偏差:结果显示,护士的知识水平一般,在关键领域存在明显差距。只有 20.3%的人正确识别了轻度过敏反应时快速静脉推注 1:1000 肾上腺素的方案,33.8%的人误认为 10%葡萄糖酸钙和 10%氯化钙可以互换。此外,44.4% 的人在表达剂量时错误地使用了 "安培 "或 "小瓶",而不是 "毫克 "或 "克",53.4% 的人没有认识到在外观相似的药物上贴上不同标签的重要性:本研究强调了加强教育计划和标准化方案的必要性,以改善肿瘤科环境中 HAMs 的安全用药和监管。加强护士对 HAMs 的认识和实践对于减少用药错误和改善患者预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge about Administration and Regulation of High Alert Medication among Nurses in Oncology Department
Background: High alert medications (HAMs) are associated with a higher risk of causing significant patient harm when used in error. Understanding the administration and regulation of these medications within oncology settings is critical due to the complex nature of cancer treatment regimens and the severity of potential medication errors. Objective: To assess the knowledge of nurses regarding the administration and regulation of high alert medications in an oncology department of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 133 registered nurses in the oncology department of Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire designed to evaluate nurses' knowledge of HAMs. Participants included both male (29.3%) and female (70.7%) nurses, with varying educational backgrounds and work experiences. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, focusing on descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Results: The results revealed moderate knowledge levels among nurses with significant gaps in critical areas. Only 20.3% correctly identified the protocol for fast IV push of 1:1000 epinephrine in mild allergic reactions, and 33.8% mistakenly believed that 10% calcium gluconate and 10% calcium chloride were interchangeable. Additionally, 44.4% incorrectly used 'Amp' or 'Vial' for dose expression instead of 'mg' or 'gm', and 53.4% failed to recognize the importance of distinctive labeling on look-alike drugs. Conclusion: The study highlights the need for enhanced educational programs and standardized protocols to improve the safe administration and regulation of HAMs in oncology settings. Strengthening nurses' knowledge and practices regarding HAMs is essential to reduce medication errors and improve patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信