使用注射用无菌水治疗分娩疼痛:随机对照试验

Palash Mazumder, Swadha Pandey, Debjit Mandi, Shyamali Dutta
{"title":"使用注射用无菌水治疗分娩疼痛:随机对照试验","authors":"Palash Mazumder, Swadha Pandey, Debjit Mandi, Shyamali Dutta","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess the efficacy of sterile water for injection (SWI) in reducing labor pain, compare it with a saline procedure, and see which one is superior. Parameters assessed were pain relief based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and duration of labor from intervention to delivery associated with administration of subcutaneous SWI versus normal saline injection (NSI).\nMethods: This is a prospective randomized interventional hospital-based comparative study of mothers who were in active labor with back pain and undergoing treatment in the labor room of Eden Hospital, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. The study was conducted on 66 willing pregnant mothers, divided into two groups of 33 each with one injected with normal saline and the other with sterile water.\nResults: The NPRS score was almost equal in 2 groups at 15 min, but with an increase in duration, it was seen that the score was low in the sterile water group compared to the normal saline group. The association was statistically significant (p<0.05).\nConclusion: This study hypothesized that subcutaneous SWI for relieving labor pain is better than subcutaneous NSI. Based on this study, it is concluded that both the SWI and NSI reduce labor pain, but the SWI produced a significantly greater reduction of pain as measured by the numeric pain rating score and also better satisfaction. Therefore, SWI is a safe, simple, and cost-effective method and can be used as a pain-relieving method, especially in the absence of other pain-relieving options.","PeriodicalId":504156,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":"94 s389","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USE OF STERILE WATER FOR INJECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"Palash Mazumder, Swadha Pandey, Debjit Mandi, Shyamali Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess the efficacy of sterile water for injection (SWI) in reducing labor pain, compare it with a saline procedure, and see which one is superior. Parameters assessed were pain relief based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and duration of labor from intervention to delivery associated with administration of subcutaneous SWI versus normal saline injection (NSI).\\nMethods: This is a prospective randomized interventional hospital-based comparative study of mothers who were in active labor with back pain and undergoing treatment in the labor room of Eden Hospital, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. The study was conducted on 66 willing pregnant mothers, divided into two groups of 33 each with one injected with normal saline and the other with sterile water.\\nResults: The NPRS score was almost equal in 2 groups at 15 min, but with an increase in duration, it was seen that the score was low in the sterile water group compared to the normal saline group. The association was statistically significant (p<0.05).\\nConclusion: This study hypothesized that subcutaneous SWI for relieving labor pain is better than subcutaneous NSI. Based on this study, it is concluded that both the SWI and NSI reduce labor pain, but the SWI produced a significantly greater reduction of pain as measured by the numeric pain rating score and also better satisfaction. Therefore, SWI is a safe, simple, and cost-effective method and can be used as a pain-relieving method, especially in the absence of other pain-relieving options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"94 s389\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i5.50495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是评估注射用无菌水(SWI)在减轻分娩疼痛方面的疗效,并将其与生理盐水程序进行比较,看哪种方法更优。评估参数包括基于数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)的疼痛缓解情况,以及皮下注射无菌水(SWI)与生理盐水注射(NSI)从干预到分娩的持续时间:这是一项以医院为基础的前瞻性随机干预对比研究,研究对象是在加尔各答医学院和医院伊甸园医院产房接受治疗的背痛产妇。研究对象为 66 名愿意接受治疗的孕产妇,分为两组,每组 33 人,一组注射生理盐水,另一组注射无菌水:15 分钟时,两组的 NPRS 分数几乎相等,但随着时间的延长,无菌水组的分数比生理盐水组低。这种关联具有统计学意义(P<0.05):本研究假设皮下 SWI 缓解分娩疼痛的效果优于皮下 NSI。根据本研究得出的结论是,SWI 和 NSI 均可减轻分娩疼痛,但根据疼痛数字评级评分,SWI 可明显减轻疼痛,而且满意度更高。因此,SWI 是一种安全、简单、经济有效的方法,可以作为一种镇痛方法,尤其是在没有其他镇痛方法的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
USE OF STERILE WATER FOR INJECTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOR PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Objectives: The objectives of the study are to assess the efficacy of sterile water for injection (SWI) in reducing labor pain, compare it with a saline procedure, and see which one is superior. Parameters assessed were pain relief based on the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and duration of labor from intervention to delivery associated with administration of subcutaneous SWI versus normal saline injection (NSI). Methods: This is a prospective randomized interventional hospital-based comparative study of mothers who were in active labor with back pain and undergoing treatment in the labor room of Eden Hospital, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. The study was conducted on 66 willing pregnant mothers, divided into two groups of 33 each with one injected with normal saline and the other with sterile water. Results: The NPRS score was almost equal in 2 groups at 15 min, but with an increase in duration, it was seen that the score was low in the sterile water group compared to the normal saline group. The association was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study hypothesized that subcutaneous SWI for relieving labor pain is better than subcutaneous NSI. Based on this study, it is concluded that both the SWI and NSI reduce labor pain, but the SWI produced a significantly greater reduction of pain as measured by the numeric pain rating score and also better satisfaction. Therefore, SWI is a safe, simple, and cost-effective method and can be used as a pain-relieving method, especially in the absence of other pain-relieving options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信