防腐剂和不含防腐剂的抗青光眼药物在引起干眼症方面的效果比较

A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Fatima Shafqat Khan, Asfandyar Asghar, Rana Intisar ul Haq, Tehmina Nazir, Sana Nadeem, Naila Obaid, Dr Nida Fatima
{"title":"防腐剂和不含防腐剂的抗青光眼药物在引起干眼症方面的效果比较","authors":"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Fatima Shafqat Khan, Asfandyar Asghar, Rana Intisar ul Haq, Tehmina Nazir, Sana Nadeem, Naila Obaid, Dr Nida Fatima","doi":"10.48036/apims.v20i2.894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the potential impact of antiglaucoma medication preservatives on ocular surface health and the subsequent development of dry eye symptoms. \nMethods: A non-randomized controlled trial study was conducted from March 2023 to June 2023.The study enrolled 32 patients, with 16 participants in each group. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria, including confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma and stable ocular health, were allocated to Group A(preserved medication) or Group B(preservative-free medication).Tear Film Break-Up Time(TBUT) and Schirmer's test were employed as objective indicators of tear film stability and tear production respectively. Measurements were recorded at baseline and after a 3-month duration of medication use. \nResults: At 1st visit, mean TBUT was 10.87 sec and mean Schirmer's test was 13.75 mm in group A while in group B it was 11.25 sec and 14.56 mm respectively. After 3 months of medication use, mean TBUT and mean Schirmer’s was 9.62 sec and 11.81 mm respectively in group A while in group B it was 10.18 sec and 13.18 mm respectively. The results showed that initial ocular status was similar in both groups however the decrease in values showed ocular surface deterioration. Notably group A demonstrated a more substantial decline in tear production compared to group B. \nConclusion: This study underscores the importance of both preserved and preservative-free anti-glaucoma medications. Although both may potentially exacerbate dry eye symptoms to a greater extent, preservative-free anti-glaucoma may offer benefits in maintaining ocular surface health with long-term use.","PeriodicalId":184398,"journal":{"name":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Effects of Preserved and Preservative Free Anti-Glaucoma Drugs in Causing Dry Eyes\",\"authors\":\"A. Pak, Inst Med Sci, Fatima Shafqat Khan, Asfandyar Asghar, Rana Intisar ul Haq, Tehmina Nazir, Sana Nadeem, Naila Obaid, Dr Nida Fatima\",\"doi\":\"10.48036/apims.v20i2.894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the potential impact of antiglaucoma medication preservatives on ocular surface health and the subsequent development of dry eye symptoms. \\nMethods: A non-randomized controlled trial study was conducted from March 2023 to June 2023.The study enrolled 32 patients, with 16 participants in each group. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria, including confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma and stable ocular health, were allocated to Group A(preserved medication) or Group B(preservative-free medication).Tear Film Break-Up Time(TBUT) and Schirmer's test were employed as objective indicators of tear film stability and tear production respectively. Measurements were recorded at baseline and after a 3-month duration of medication use. \\nResults: At 1st visit, mean TBUT was 10.87 sec and mean Schirmer's test was 13.75 mm in group A while in group B it was 11.25 sec and 14.56 mm respectively. After 3 months of medication use, mean TBUT and mean Schirmer’s was 9.62 sec and 11.81 mm respectively in group A while in group B it was 10.18 sec and 13.18 mm respectively. The results showed that initial ocular status was similar in both groups however the decrease in values showed ocular surface deterioration. Notably group A demonstrated a more substantial decline in tear production compared to group B. \\nConclusion: This study underscores the importance of both preserved and preservative-free anti-glaucoma medications. Although both may potentially exacerbate dry eye symptoms to a greater extent, preservative-free anti-glaucoma may offer benefits in maintaining ocular surface health with long-term use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v20i2.894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v20i2.894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估抗青光眼药物防腐剂对眼表健康的潜在影响以及干眼症状的后续发展。研究方法研究共招募了 32 名患者,每组 16 人。符合纳入标准(包括确诊青光眼和眼部健康状况稳定)的患者被分配到 A 组(含防腐剂药物)或 B 组(不含防腐剂药物)。泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和施尔默氏试验分别作为泪膜稳定性和泪液分泌的客观指标。泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和施尔默氏试验分别作为泪膜稳定性和泪液分泌量的客观指标。结果在第一次就诊时,A 组的平均 TBUT 为 10.87 秒,Schirmer's 测试的平均值为 13.75 毫米,而 B 组分别为 11.25 秒和 14.56 毫米。用药 3 个月后,A 组的平均 TBUT 和平均 Schirmer's 分别为 9.62 秒和 11.81 毫米,而 B 组分别为 10.18 秒和 13.18 毫米。结果显示,两组患者最初的眼部状态相似,但数值的下降表明眼表恶化。值得注意的是,与 B 组相比,A 组的泪液分泌量下降幅度更大:这项研究强调了防腐和不含防腐剂的抗青光眼药物的重要性。虽然这两种药物都有可能在更大程度上加重干眼症状,但长期使用不含防腐剂的抗青光眼药物可能会在维持眼表健康方面带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Effects of Preserved and Preservative Free Anti-Glaucoma Drugs in Causing Dry Eyes
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the potential impact of antiglaucoma medication preservatives on ocular surface health and the subsequent development of dry eye symptoms. Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial study was conducted from March 2023 to June 2023.The study enrolled 32 patients, with 16 participants in each group. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria, including confirmed diagnosis of glaucoma and stable ocular health, were allocated to Group A(preserved medication) or Group B(preservative-free medication).Tear Film Break-Up Time(TBUT) and Schirmer's test were employed as objective indicators of tear film stability and tear production respectively. Measurements were recorded at baseline and after a 3-month duration of medication use. Results: At 1st visit, mean TBUT was 10.87 sec and mean Schirmer's test was 13.75 mm in group A while in group B it was 11.25 sec and 14.56 mm respectively. After 3 months of medication use, mean TBUT and mean Schirmer’s was 9.62 sec and 11.81 mm respectively in group A while in group B it was 10.18 sec and 13.18 mm respectively. The results showed that initial ocular status was similar in both groups however the decrease in values showed ocular surface deterioration. Notably group A demonstrated a more substantial decline in tear production compared to group B. Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of both preserved and preservative-free anti-glaucoma medications. Although both may potentially exacerbate dry eye symptoms to a greater extent, preservative-free anti-glaucoma may offer benefits in maintaining ocular surface health with long-term use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信