评估数字饮食评估工具的科学质量和可用性

Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.3390/dietetics3020013
Vanessa Böse, Marius Frenser, Melanie Schumacher, Tobias Fischer
{"title":"评估数字饮食评估工具的科学质量和可用性","authors":"Vanessa Böse, Marius Frenser, Melanie Schumacher, Tobias Fischer","doi":"10.3390/dietetics3020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of digital tools for dietary assessment has increased in recent years, both commercially and scientifically. In the field of nutrition research, the digitization of dietary assessment methods presents many opportunities and risks. One of the main challenges is ensuring scientific quality while maintaining good usability. In this context, an evaluation tool was developed based on the guidelines of the European Food Safety Authorization (EFSA; 2009 and 2014), complemented by the usability aspect of health-related applications. This was followed by a literature search concerning the available dietary assessment tools, which were analyzed according to the evaluation criteria. Eight applications were included in the study after reviewing the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the digital tools. A total of thirty-eight requirements in eight main categories were defined for the evaluation, which the best possible dietary assessment tool should meet. The evaluation showed that none of the tested tools currently meet all the defined requirements or categories. The aspects of usability and the accuracy of data collection showed a positive correlation, suggesting a direct link between the two categories and providing an important approach for future developments.","PeriodicalId":503963,"journal":{"name":"Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Scientific Quality and Usability of Digital Dietary Assessment Tools\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Böse, Marius Frenser, Melanie Schumacher, Tobias Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dietetics3020013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of digital tools for dietary assessment has increased in recent years, both commercially and scientifically. In the field of nutrition research, the digitization of dietary assessment methods presents many opportunities and risks. One of the main challenges is ensuring scientific quality while maintaining good usability. In this context, an evaluation tool was developed based on the guidelines of the European Food Safety Authorization (EFSA; 2009 and 2014), complemented by the usability aspect of health-related applications. This was followed by a literature search concerning the available dietary assessment tools, which were analyzed according to the evaluation criteria. Eight applications were included in the study after reviewing the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the digital tools. A total of thirty-eight requirements in eight main categories were defined for the evaluation, which the best possible dietary assessment tool should meet. The evaluation showed that none of the tested tools currently meet all the defined requirements or categories. The aspects of usability and the accuracy of data collection showed a positive correlation, suggesting a direct link between the two categories and providing an important approach for future developments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dietetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics3020013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics3020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,数字化膳食评估工具在商业和科学两方面的重要性都在增加。在营养研究领域,膳食评估方法的数字化带来了许多机遇和风险。主要挑战之一是在确保科学质量的同时,保持良好的可用性。在此背景下,我们根据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA;2009 年和 2014 年)的指导方针开发了一种评估工具,并从健康相关应用的可用性方面进行了补充。随后对现有的膳食评估工具进行了文献检索,并根据评估标准对其进行了分析。在审查了数字工具的纳入和排除标准后,八项应用被纳入研究。评估共确定了八大类 38 项要求,最佳膳食评估工具应满足这些要求。评估结果表明,目前没有一款测试工具能满足所有规定的要求或类别。可用性和数据收集的准确性呈现出正相关,表明这两个类别之间存在直接联系,并为今后的开发提供了重要方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Scientific Quality and Usability of Digital Dietary Assessment Tools
The importance of digital tools for dietary assessment has increased in recent years, both commercially and scientifically. In the field of nutrition research, the digitization of dietary assessment methods presents many opportunities and risks. One of the main challenges is ensuring scientific quality while maintaining good usability. In this context, an evaluation tool was developed based on the guidelines of the European Food Safety Authorization (EFSA; 2009 and 2014), complemented by the usability aspect of health-related applications. This was followed by a literature search concerning the available dietary assessment tools, which were analyzed according to the evaluation criteria. Eight applications were included in the study after reviewing the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the digital tools. A total of thirty-eight requirements in eight main categories were defined for the evaluation, which the best possible dietary assessment tool should meet. The evaluation showed that none of the tested tools currently meet all the defined requirements or categories. The aspects of usability and the accuracy of data collection showed a positive correlation, suggesting a direct link between the two categories and providing an important approach for future developments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信