记者面对媒体监督:从现场理论进行分析

Frida V. Rodelo, Zariá Casillas Olivares
{"title":"记者面对媒体监督:从现场理论进行分析","authors":"Frida V. Rodelo, Zariá Casillas Olivares","doi":"10.32870/cys.v2024.8717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiences of media monitoring are not usually accompanied by inquiries about the way in which journalists consume and interpret these projects. This study fills that gap by focusing on the subjectivity of journalists working in monitored media. The study, based on Bourdieu's field theory, revealed positions regarding monitoring classified into two poles (conserving the field and subverting the field) structured around the accumulation of capital. Knowing the internal dynamics of the journalistic field allowed us to understand its degree of openness to change.","PeriodicalId":112547,"journal":{"name":"Comunicación y Sociedad","volume":" 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journalists facing media monitoring: an analysis from field theory\",\"authors\":\"Frida V. Rodelo, Zariá Casillas Olivares\",\"doi\":\"10.32870/cys.v2024.8717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Experiences of media monitoring are not usually accompanied by inquiries about the way in which journalists consume and interpret these projects. This study fills that gap by focusing on the subjectivity of journalists working in monitored media. The study, based on Bourdieu's field theory, revealed positions regarding monitoring classified into two poles (conserving the field and subverting the field) structured around the accumulation of capital. Knowing the internal dynamics of the journalistic field allowed us to understand its degree of openness to change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comunicación y Sociedad\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comunicación y Sociedad\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2024.8717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicación y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2024.8717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

媒体监督的经验通常没有伴随着对记者消费和解释这些项目的方式的调查。本研究通过关注在受监督媒体工作的记者的主观性,填补了这一空白。本研究以布迪厄的领域理论为基础,揭示了围绕资本积累而形成的两极立场(保护领域和颠覆领域)。通过了解新闻领域的内部动态,我们得以了解其对变革的开放程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Journalists facing media monitoring: an analysis from field theory
Experiences of media monitoring are not usually accompanied by inquiries about the way in which journalists consume and interpret these projects. This study fills that gap by focusing on the subjectivity of journalists working in monitored media. The study, based on Bourdieu's field theory, revealed positions regarding monitoring classified into two poles (conserving the field and subverting the field) structured around the accumulation of capital. Knowing the internal dynamics of the journalistic field allowed us to understand its degree of openness to change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信