颈动脉疾病分类:2021 年协会间评审委员会更新建议与 2003 年放射医师学会超声共识会议标准的对比影响

Q4 Medicine
E. Wooster, David M. Williams, D. Wooster
{"title":"颈动脉疾病分类:2021 年协会间评审委员会更新建议与 2003 年放射医师学会超声共识会议标准的对比影响","authors":"E. Wooster, David M. Williams, D. Wooster","doi":"10.1177/15443167241249241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) introduced modified criteria for carotid duplex interpretation based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) and PSV ratio. The most significant change compared to the 2003 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) criteria involved re-defining the thresholds for <50 and 50% to 69% stenosis ranges. Patients identified in <50% vs 50% to 69% ranges may face different disease severity assignments, variable surveillance protocols, medical management approaches, and recommendations for intervention. Facilities may experience altered payment coverage, issues of staff re-training, and questions from referring physicians regarding patient treatment and disease management expectations. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of re-defining these stenosis ranges using the 2021 IAC criteria vs the SRU criteria. Anonymized patient data from carotid duplex examinations were collected as part of an internal laboratory quality improvement strategy. These data were analyzed in an electronic database using the IAC and SRU threshold criteria to determine the degree of carotid stenosis. Patients with normal arteries, unilateral studies, or complete occlusions were excluded. Of the 1000 patients considered, 850 met the eligibility criteria. Using PSV: for the right carotid, 242 (28.5%) showed a change and 608 (71.5%) showed no change in stenosis classification; for the left carotid, 228 (27%) showed a change and 622 (73%) showed no change. All changes were a downgrading of disease to <50% stenosis. Using PSV ratio: for the right carotid, re-assignment of 53 (22% of changed, 6% of total cohort); for the left carotid, re-assignment of 48 (21% of changed, 5.6% of total cohort). All changes resulted in re-assignment to the 50% to 69% stenosis category. Implementation of the IAC criteria resulted in patients being re-assigned to lower stenosis categories (27% for PSV and 21% for PSV ratio). The impact of these changes on patient care and facility logistics needs careful consideration.","PeriodicalId":52510,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid Disease Classification: Impact of the 2021 Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Updated Recommendations vs 2003 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Criteria\",\"authors\":\"E. Wooster, David M. Williams, D. Wooster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15443167241249241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2021, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) introduced modified criteria for carotid duplex interpretation based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) and PSV ratio. The most significant change compared to the 2003 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) criteria involved re-defining the thresholds for <50 and 50% to 69% stenosis ranges. Patients identified in <50% vs 50% to 69% ranges may face different disease severity assignments, variable surveillance protocols, medical management approaches, and recommendations for intervention. Facilities may experience altered payment coverage, issues of staff re-training, and questions from referring physicians regarding patient treatment and disease management expectations. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of re-defining these stenosis ranges using the 2021 IAC criteria vs the SRU criteria. Anonymized patient data from carotid duplex examinations were collected as part of an internal laboratory quality improvement strategy. These data were analyzed in an electronic database using the IAC and SRU threshold criteria to determine the degree of carotid stenosis. Patients with normal arteries, unilateral studies, or complete occlusions were excluded. Of the 1000 patients considered, 850 met the eligibility criteria. Using PSV: for the right carotid, 242 (28.5%) showed a change and 608 (71.5%) showed no change in stenosis classification; for the left carotid, 228 (27%) showed a change and 622 (73%) showed no change. All changes were a downgrading of disease to <50% stenosis. Using PSV ratio: for the right carotid, re-assignment of 53 (22% of changed, 6% of total cohort); for the left carotid, re-assignment of 48 (21% of changed, 5.6% of total cohort). All changes resulted in re-assignment to the 50% to 69% stenosis category. Implementation of the IAC criteria resulted in patients being re-assigned to lower stenosis categories (27% for PSV and 21% for PSV ratio). The impact of these changes on patient care and facility logistics needs careful consideration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241249241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167241249241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021 年,协会间评审委员会 (IAC) 根据峰值收缩速度 (PSV) 和 PSV 比值对颈动脉双相图解读标准进行了修改。与 2003 年放射医师超声学会(SRU)标准相比,最重要的变化是重新定义了狭窄范围<50% 和 50%至 69% 的阈值。被确定为<50% 和 50%-69%范围的患者可能会面临不同的疾病严重程度分配、不同的监测方案、医疗管理方法和干预建议。医疗机构可能会遇到支付范围改变、员工再培训问题以及转诊医生对患者治疗和疾病管理期望的质疑。本研究旨在评估使用 2021 年 IAC 标准与 SRU 标准重新定义这些狭窄范围的影响。作为内部实验室质量改进策略的一部分,我们收集了来自颈动脉双相检查的匿名患者数据。在电子数据库中使用 IAC 和 SRU 阈值标准对这些数据进行分析,以确定颈动脉狭窄的程度。动脉正常、单侧检查或完全闭塞的患者被排除在外。在考虑的 1000 名患者中,有 850 人符合资格标准。使用 PSV:在右侧颈动脉中,242 例(28.5%)的狭窄分级有变化,608 例(71.5%)无变化;在左侧颈动脉中,228 例(27%)的狭窄分级有变化,622 例(73%)无变化。所有的变化都是将疾病降级为狭窄<50%。使用 PSV 比值:右颈动脉重新分配 53 例(22% 的病例发生变化,占总病例数的 6%);左颈动脉重新分配 48 例(21% 的病例发生变化,占总病例数的 5.6%)。所有更改均导致重新分配到 50%至 69% 狭窄类别。IAC 标准的实施导致患者被重新分配到较低的狭窄类别(PSV 为 27%,PSV 比率为 21%)。这些变化对患者护理和设施后勤的影响需要仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carotid Disease Classification: Impact of the 2021 Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Updated Recommendations vs 2003 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Criteria
In 2021, the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) introduced modified criteria for carotid duplex interpretation based on peak systolic velocity (PSV) and PSV ratio. The most significant change compared to the 2003 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) criteria involved re-defining the thresholds for <50 and 50% to 69% stenosis ranges. Patients identified in <50% vs 50% to 69% ranges may face different disease severity assignments, variable surveillance protocols, medical management approaches, and recommendations for intervention. Facilities may experience altered payment coverage, issues of staff re-training, and questions from referring physicians regarding patient treatment and disease management expectations. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of re-defining these stenosis ranges using the 2021 IAC criteria vs the SRU criteria. Anonymized patient data from carotid duplex examinations were collected as part of an internal laboratory quality improvement strategy. These data were analyzed in an electronic database using the IAC and SRU threshold criteria to determine the degree of carotid stenosis. Patients with normal arteries, unilateral studies, or complete occlusions were excluded. Of the 1000 patients considered, 850 met the eligibility criteria. Using PSV: for the right carotid, 242 (28.5%) showed a change and 608 (71.5%) showed no change in stenosis classification; for the left carotid, 228 (27%) showed a change and 622 (73%) showed no change. All changes were a downgrading of disease to <50% stenosis. Using PSV ratio: for the right carotid, re-assignment of 53 (22% of changed, 6% of total cohort); for the left carotid, re-assignment of 48 (21% of changed, 5.6% of total cohort). All changes resulted in re-assignment to the 50% to 69% stenosis category. Implementation of the IAC criteria resulted in patients being re-assigned to lower stenosis categories (27% for PSV and 21% for PSV ratio). The impact of these changes on patient care and facility logistics needs careful consideration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信