单独施用和联合施用恩多索和 2,4-D 在米尔福林杂交种(Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum)中的活性

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Weed Science Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1017/wsc.2024.26
Mirella F. Ortiz, Scott J. Nissen, Franck E. Dayan
{"title":"单独施用和联合施用恩多索和 2,4-D 在米尔福林杂交种(Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum)中的活性","authors":"Mirella F. Ortiz, Scott J. Nissen, Franck E. Dayan","doi":"10.1017/wsc.2024.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) is an invasive aquatic plant that can hybridize with the native Northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom.). These milfoil hybrids (M. spicatum × M. sibiricum) are becoming more prevalent in many lakes where the invasive and the native milfoil co-occur. Hybrid plants are more vigorous than either parent with a faster growth rate and lower sensitivity to some herbicides. The aquatic herbicides, endothall and 2,4-D, provide two effective modes of action (MOA) for management of the hybrids. For more than a decade, these two herbicides have been used in combination as an effective control option and a resistance management strategy. How this combination impacts herbicide movement and efficacy is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this research was to determine the activity of endothall and 2,4-D combined compared to activity applied alone. Absorption and translocation of endothall, 2,4-D and the combination was determined in hybrid plants over a 96-h time course. Endothall bioaccumulation was not impacted when these herbicides were applied in combination; however, 2,4-D accumulation increased by 80%, relative to when 2,4-D was applied alone. Endothall translocation from shoots to roots decreased by almost 50% when applied in combination with 2,4-D (alone = 16.7% ± 2.6; combination = 9.2% ± 1.2). Shoot-to-root translocation of 2,4-D also decreased when the two herbicides were applied in combination (24.8% ± 2.6 when applied alone to only 3.93% ± 0.4 when in the presence of endothall). This research demonstrates that combining herbicides can significantly impact herbicide activity in plants. Future research is needed to determine if this reduced translocation negatively impacts operational effectiveness when these herbicides applied in combination.","PeriodicalId":23688,"journal":{"name":"Weed Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothall and 2,4-D Activity in Milfoil Hybrid (Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum) when Applied Alone and in Combination\",\"authors\":\"Mirella F. Ortiz, Scott J. Nissen, Franck E. Dayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wsc.2024.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) is an invasive aquatic plant that can hybridize with the native Northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom.). These milfoil hybrids (M. spicatum × M. sibiricum) are becoming more prevalent in many lakes where the invasive and the native milfoil co-occur. Hybrid plants are more vigorous than either parent with a faster growth rate and lower sensitivity to some herbicides. The aquatic herbicides, endothall and 2,4-D, provide two effective modes of action (MOA) for management of the hybrids. For more than a decade, these two herbicides have been used in combination as an effective control option and a resistance management strategy. How this combination impacts herbicide movement and efficacy is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this research was to determine the activity of endothall and 2,4-D combined compared to activity applied alone. Absorption and translocation of endothall, 2,4-D and the combination was determined in hybrid plants over a 96-h time course. Endothall bioaccumulation was not impacted when these herbicides were applied in combination; however, 2,4-D accumulation increased by 80%, relative to when 2,4-D was applied alone. Endothall translocation from shoots to roots decreased by almost 50% when applied in combination with 2,4-D (alone = 16.7% ± 2.6; combination = 9.2% ± 1.2). Shoot-to-root translocation of 2,4-D also decreased when the two herbicides were applied in combination (24.8% ± 2.6 when applied alone to only 3.93% ± 0.4 when in the presence of endothall). This research demonstrates that combining herbicides can significantly impact herbicide activity in plants. Future research is needed to determine if this reduced translocation negatively impacts operational effectiveness when these herbicides applied in combination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.26\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧亚水黍属植物(Myriophyllum spicatum L.)是一种入侵性水生植物,可与本地的北方水黍属植物(Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom.)杂交。这些小黍杂交种(M. spicatum × M. sibiricum)在许多入侵小黍和本地小黍共生的湖泊中越来越普遍。杂交植物比亲本的生命力更强,生长速度更快,对某些除草剂的敏感性更低。水生除草剂内吸磷和 2,4-D 提供了两种有效的作用模式 (MOA),可用于管理杂交植物。十多年来,这两种除草剂一直作为一种有效的控制方法和抗药性管理策略结合使用。这种组合如何影响除草剂的移动和药效尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是确定内吸性除草剂和 2,4-D 组合使用时的活性与单独使用时的活性。在 96 小时的时间过程中,测定了杂交植物对内吸性除草剂、2,4-D 和组合除草剂的吸收和转移情况。当这些除草剂混合施用时,内吸磷的生物蓄积性没有受到影响;但是,与单独施用 2,4-D 相比,2,4-D 的蓄积量增加了 80%。与 2,4-D 同时施用时,Endothall 从嫩芽到根部的转化率降低了近 50%(单独施用 = 16.7% ± 2.6;同时施用 = 9.2% ± 1.2)。当两种除草剂混合施用时,2,4-D 从嫩芽到根部的转移量也会减少(单独施用时为 24.8% ± 2.6,而与内吸灵混合施用时仅为 3.93% ± 0.4)。这项研究表明,混合使用除草剂会显著影响除草剂在植物体内的活性。今后还需要进行研究,以确定当这些除草剂混合使用时,转运能力的降低是否会对作业效果产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endothall and 2,4-D Activity in Milfoil Hybrid (Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum) when Applied Alone and in Combination
Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) is an invasive aquatic plant that can hybridize with the native Northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum Kom.). These milfoil hybrids (M. spicatum × M. sibiricum) are becoming more prevalent in many lakes where the invasive and the native milfoil co-occur. Hybrid plants are more vigorous than either parent with a faster growth rate and lower sensitivity to some herbicides. The aquatic herbicides, endothall and 2,4-D, provide two effective modes of action (MOA) for management of the hybrids. For more than a decade, these two herbicides have been used in combination as an effective control option and a resistance management strategy. How this combination impacts herbicide movement and efficacy is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this research was to determine the activity of endothall and 2,4-D combined compared to activity applied alone. Absorption and translocation of endothall, 2,4-D and the combination was determined in hybrid plants over a 96-h time course. Endothall bioaccumulation was not impacted when these herbicides were applied in combination; however, 2,4-D accumulation increased by 80%, relative to when 2,4-D was applied alone. Endothall translocation from shoots to roots decreased by almost 50% when applied in combination with 2,4-D (alone = 16.7% ± 2.6; combination = 9.2% ± 1.2). Shoot-to-root translocation of 2,4-D also decreased when the two herbicides were applied in combination (24.8% ± 2.6 when applied alone to only 3.93% ± 0.4 when in the presence of endothall). This research demonstrates that combining herbicides can significantly impact herbicide activity in plants. Future research is needed to determine if this reduced translocation negatively impacts operational effectiveness when these herbicides applied in combination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Science
Weed Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science in agricultural systems. Topics for Weed Science include: - the biology and ecology of weeds in agricultural, forestry, aquatic, turf, recreational, rights-of-way and other settings, genetics of weeds - herbicide resistance, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and molecular action of herbicides and plant growth regulators used to manage undesirable vegetation - ecology of cropping and other agricultural systems as they relate to weed management - biological and ecological aspects of weed control tools including biological agents, and herbicide resistant crops - effect of weed management on soil, air and water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信