地下煤气化(UCG)过程中工业后处理水中细菌多样性的启示

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 Environmental Science
Łukasz Jałowiecki, Jacek Borgulat, A. Strugała-Wilczek, Jan Jastrzębski, M. Matejczyk, Grażyna Płaza
{"title":"地下煤气化(UCG)过程中工业后处理水中细菌多样性的启示","authors":"Łukasz Jałowiecki, Jacek Borgulat, A. Strugała-Wilczek, Jan Jastrzębski, M. Matejczyk, Grażyna Płaza","doi":"10.24425/aep.2024.150550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study represents the first culture-independent profiling of microbial diversity in post-processing wastewater from underground coal gasification (UCG) processes. Three types of post-processing wastewater, named W1, W2 and W3, were obtained from three UCG processes involving two types of coal and two gasification agents, namely oxygen-enriched air and oxygen. Very high concentrations of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phenol were detected in the wastewater, classifying it into the fifth toxicity class, indicating very high acute toxicity. The values for the Shannon (H), Ace and Chao1 indices in W2 were the lowest compared to their values in W1 and W3. The dominate phyla were Proteobacteria, contributing 84.64% and 77.92% in W1 and W3, respectively, while Firmicutes dominated in W2 with a contribution of 66.85%. At the class level, Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria were predominant in W1 and W3, while Bacilli and Actinobacteria were predominant in W2. Among Bacilli, the Paenibacillus and Bacillus genera were the most numerous. Our results suggest that the main differentiating factor of the bacterial structure and diversity in the wastewater could be the gasification agent. These findings provide new insights into the shifting patterns of dominant bacteria in post-processing wastewater and illustrate the spread of bacteria in industrial contaminated wastewater.","PeriodicalId":8284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Protection","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into bacterial diversity in industrial post-processing water from underground coal gasification (UCG) process\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Jałowiecki, Jacek Borgulat, A. Strugała-Wilczek, Jan Jastrzębski, M. Matejczyk, Grażyna Płaza\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/aep.2024.150550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study represents the first culture-independent profiling of microbial diversity in post-processing wastewater from underground coal gasification (UCG) processes. Three types of post-processing wastewater, named W1, W2 and W3, were obtained from three UCG processes involving two types of coal and two gasification agents, namely oxygen-enriched air and oxygen. Very high concentrations of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phenol were detected in the wastewater, classifying it into the fifth toxicity class, indicating very high acute toxicity. The values for the Shannon (H), Ace and Chao1 indices in W2 were the lowest compared to their values in W1 and W3. The dominate phyla were Proteobacteria, contributing 84.64% and 77.92% in W1 and W3, respectively, while Firmicutes dominated in W2 with a contribution of 66.85%. At the class level, Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria were predominant in W1 and W3, while Bacilli and Actinobacteria were predominant in W2. Among Bacilli, the Paenibacillus and Bacillus genera were the most numerous. Our results suggest that the main differentiating factor of the bacterial structure and diversity in the wastewater could be the gasification agent. These findings provide new insights into the shifting patterns of dominant bacteria in post-processing wastewater and illustrate the spread of bacteria in industrial contaminated wastewater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2024.150550\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2024.150550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究首次对地下煤气化(UCG)工艺后处理废水中的微生物多样性进行了独立培养分析。三类后处理废水分别被命名为 W1、W2 和 W3,它们来自三个 UCG 过程,涉及两种煤炭和两种气化剂(即富氧空气和氧气)。废水中检测到极高浓度的 BTEX(苯、甲苯、乙苯、二甲苯)、多芳烃和苯酚,将其归入第五毒性等级,表明其急性毒性极高。与 W1 和 W3 相比,W2 的香农(H)指数、Ace 指数和 Chao1 指数值最低。在 W1 和 W3 中,蛋白质细菌占主导地位,分别占 84.64% 和 77.92%,而在 W2 中,固着菌占主导地位,占 66.85%。在类的层面上,W1 和 W3 中主要是伽马蛋白菌和兼性蛋白菌,而 W2 中主要是芽孢杆菌和放线菌。在芽孢杆菌中,以巴氏杆菌属和芽孢杆菌属的数量最多。我们的研究结果表明,废水中细菌结构和多样性的主要分化因素可能是气化剂。这些发现为了解后处理废水中优势细菌的变化模式提供了新的视角,并说明了细菌在工业污染废水中的传播情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights into bacterial diversity in industrial post-processing water from underground coal gasification (UCG) process
This study represents the first culture-independent profiling of microbial diversity in post-processing wastewater from underground coal gasification (UCG) processes. Three types of post-processing wastewater, named W1, W2 and W3, were obtained from three UCG processes involving two types of coal and two gasification agents, namely oxygen-enriched air and oxygen. Very high concentrations of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phenol were detected in the wastewater, classifying it into the fifth toxicity class, indicating very high acute toxicity. The values for the Shannon (H), Ace and Chao1 indices in W2 were the lowest compared to their values in W1 and W3. The dominate phyla were Proteobacteria, contributing 84.64% and 77.92% in W1 and W3, respectively, while Firmicutes dominated in W2 with a contribution of 66.85%. At the class level, Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria were predominant in W1 and W3, while Bacilli and Actinobacteria were predominant in W2. Among Bacilli, the Paenibacillus and Bacillus genera were the most numerous. Our results suggest that the main differentiating factor of the bacterial structure and diversity in the wastewater could be the gasification agent. These findings provide new insights into the shifting patterns of dominant bacteria in post-processing wastewater and illustrate the spread of bacteria in industrial contaminated wastewater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Environmental Protection
Archives of Environmental Protection 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Environmental Protection is the oldest Polish scientific journal of international scope that publishes articles on engineering and environmental protection. The quarterly has been published by the Institute of Environmental Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences since 1975. The journal has served as a forum for the exchange of views and ideas among scientists. It has become part of scientific life in Poland and abroad. The quarterly publishes the results of research and scientific inquiries by best specialists hereby becoming an important pillar of science. The journal facilitates better understanding of environmental risks to humans and ecosystems and it also shows the methods for their analysis as well as trends in the search of effective solutions to minimize these risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信