Sabari K. Kumar, Satyajeet Misra, B. Behera, Neha Singh, D. Muduly, Anand Srinivasan
{"title":"术中小剂量氯胺酮与右美托咪定输注对胃肠道恶性肿瘤手术患者术后肠道恢复的影响:安慰剂对照随机试验","authors":"Sabari K. Kumar, Satyajeet Misra, B. Behera, Neha Singh, D. Muduly, Anand Srinivasan","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n No studies have compared the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on bowel recovery. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy surgeries.\n \n \n \n This placebo-controlled, randomized study was carried out in 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists II patients, aged 18–70 years, of either gender, undergoing elective open GI malignancy surgeries. Patients received intraoperative infusion of ketamine @ 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 (KET), dexmedetomidine @ 0.25 μg kg-1 h-1 (DEX), or normal saline (placebo). Primary outcome was the time to first flatus and/or stool. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, total analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, time to feeds, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the incidence of adverse events. Continuous data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test.\n \n \n \n Median time to passage of flatus and/or stool was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–3] days in the KET group, 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the DEX group, and 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the placebo group (P = 0.53 for placebo vs. KET, 0.81 for placebo vs. DEX, and 0.99 for KET vs. DEX). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly less in the intervention groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other secondary outcomes.\n \n \n \n Low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine did not result in early bowel recovery despite lower pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open GI malignancy surgeries.\n \n Key Message:\n \n What is known: Ketamine and dexmedetomidine may promote bowel recovery by improving analgesia and decreasing opioid usage.Main findings: This randomized controlled trial found no evidence of earlier bowel recovery with ketamine or dexmedetomidine versus placebo despite lower pain scores and analgesic consumption in the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups.\n \n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of intraoperative low-dose ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal malignancy surgeries: Placebo-controlled, randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Sabari K. Kumar, Satyajeet Misra, B. Behera, Neha Singh, D. Muduly, Anand Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n No studies have compared the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on bowel recovery. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy surgeries.\\n \\n \\n \\n This placebo-controlled, randomized study was carried out in 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists II patients, aged 18–70 years, of either gender, undergoing elective open GI malignancy surgeries. Patients received intraoperative infusion of ketamine @ 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 (KET), dexmedetomidine @ 0.25 μg kg-1 h-1 (DEX), or normal saline (placebo). Primary outcome was the time to first flatus and/or stool. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, total analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, time to feeds, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the incidence of adverse events. Continuous data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test.\\n \\n \\n \\n Median time to passage of flatus and/or stool was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–3] days in the KET group, 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the DEX group, and 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the placebo group (P = 0.53 for placebo vs. KET, 0.81 for placebo vs. DEX, and 0.99 for KET vs. DEX). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly less in the intervention groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other secondary outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n Low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine did not result in early bowel recovery despite lower pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open GI malignancy surgeries.\\n \\n Key Message:\\n \\n What is known: Ketamine and dexmedetomidine may promote bowel recovery by improving analgesia and decreasing opioid usage.Main findings: This randomized controlled trial found no evidence of earlier bowel recovery with ketamine or dexmedetomidine versus placebo despite lower pain scores and analgesic consumption in the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_322_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前还没有研究比较氯胺酮和右美托咪定对肠道恢复的影响。我们评估了术中输注低剂量氯胺酮或右美托咪定对胃肠道恶性肿瘤手术患者术后肠道恢复的影响。 这项安慰剂对照随机研究在 84 名美国麻醉医师协会 II 级患者中进行,患者年龄在 18-70 岁之间,性别不限,均接受择期开放式消化道恶性肿瘤手术。患者术中输注氯胺酮(0.1 毫克/公斤-1 小时-1)、右美托咪定(0.25 微克/公斤-1 小时-1)或生理盐水(安慰剂)。主要结果是首次胀气和/或排便的时间。次要结果包括拔管时间、总镇痛剂需求量、术后疼痛评分、进食时间、重症监护室(ICU)和住院时间以及不良事件发生率。连续数据采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)或Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。分类数据采用卡方检验(Chi-square test)或费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact test)进行分析。 KET 组排出胀气和/或粪便的中位时间为 3 [四分位距 (IQR) 2-3] 天,DEX 组为 2 [IQR 2-3] 天,安慰剂组为 2 [IQR 2-3] 天(安慰剂 vs. KET 的 P = 0.53,安慰剂 vs. DEX 的 P = 0.81,KET vs. DEX 的 P = 0.99)。与安慰剂组相比,干预组的疼痛评分和镇痛剂用量明显减少(P < 0.001)。其他次要结果无差异。 尽管开放性消化道恶性肿瘤手术患者的疼痛评分和阿片类药物用量较低,但低剂量氯胺酮或右美托咪定并不能使患者尽早恢复肠道功能。 关键信息: 已知信息:氯胺酮和右美托咪定可通过改善镇痛和减少阿片类药物用量促进肠道恢复:这项随机对照试验发现,尽管氯胺酮组和右美托咪定组的疼痛评分和镇痛剂用量较低,但没有证据表明氯胺酮或右美托咪定与安慰剂相比能加快肠道恢复。
The effect of intraoperative low-dose ketamine versus dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal malignancy surgeries: Placebo-controlled, randomized trial
No studies have compared the effects of ketamine and dexmedetomidine on bowel recovery. We evaluated the effects of intraoperative low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative bowel recovery in patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy surgeries.
This placebo-controlled, randomized study was carried out in 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists II patients, aged 18–70 years, of either gender, undergoing elective open GI malignancy surgeries. Patients received intraoperative infusion of ketamine @ 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 (KET), dexmedetomidine @ 0.25 μg kg-1 h-1 (DEX), or normal saline (placebo). Primary outcome was the time to first flatus and/or stool. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, total analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, time to feeds, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and the incidence of adverse events. Continuous data were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical data were analyzed by the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test.
Median time to passage of flatus and/or stool was 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–3] days in the KET group, 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the DEX group, and 2 [IQR 2–3] days in the placebo group (P = 0.53 for placebo vs. KET, 0.81 for placebo vs. DEX, and 0.99 for KET vs. DEX). Pain scores and analgesic consumption were significantly less in the intervention groups versus placebo (P < 0.001). No difference was seen in other secondary outcomes.
Low-dose ketamine or dexmedetomidine did not result in early bowel recovery despite lower pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing open GI malignancy surgeries.
Key Message:
What is known: Ketamine and dexmedetomidine may promote bowel recovery by improving analgesia and decreasing opioid usage.Main findings: This randomized controlled trial found no evidence of earlier bowel recovery with ketamine or dexmedetomidine versus placebo despite lower pain scores and analgesic consumption in the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups.