Unmesha Roy Paladhi, David A. Katz, George Otieno, James P. Hughes, Harsha Thirumurthy, Harison Lagat, S. Masyuko, Monisha Sharma, P. Macharia, R. Bosire, M. Mugambi, Edward Kariithi, C. Farquhar
{"title":"在伴侣辅助服务中使用额外的 HIV 自我检测包作为增加 HIV 检测的激励措施的效果","authors":"Unmesha Roy Paladhi, David A. Katz, George Otieno, James P. Hughes, Harsha Thirumurthy, Harison Lagat, S. Masyuko, Monisha Sharma, P. Macharia, R. Bosire, M. Mugambi, Edward Kariithi, C. Farquhar","doi":"10.1097/qai.0000000000003455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Incentives have shown mixed results in increasing HIV testing rates in low-resource settings. We investigated the effectiveness of offering additional self-tests (HIVSTs) as an incentive to increase testing among partners receiving assisted partner services.\n \n \n \n Western Kenya\n \n \n \n We conducted a single-crossover study nested within a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-four facilities were randomized 1:1 to 1) control: provider-delivered testing, or 2) intervention: offered one HIVST or provider-delivered testing for six months (pre-implementation), then switched to offering two HIVSTs for six months (post-implementation). A difference-in-differences approach using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for facility clustering and adjusting for age, sex, and income, was used to estimate the effect of the incentive on HIV testing and first-time testing among partners in APS.\n \n \n \n March 2021-June 2022, 1127 index clients received APS and named 8155 partners, among whom 2333 reported a prior HIV diagnosis and were excluded from analyses, resulting in 5822 remaining partners: 3646 (62.6%) and 2176 (37.4%) in the pre- and post-implementation periods respectively. Overall, 944/2176 (43%) partners were offered a second HIVST during post-implementation, of whom 34.3% picked up two kits, of whom 71.7% reported that the second kit encouraged HIV testing. Comparing partners offered one vs. two HIVSTs showed no difference in HIV testing (relative risk[RR]:1.01, 95%Confidence Interval[CI]:0.951-1.07) or HIV testing for the first time (RR:1.23, 95%CI:0.671-2.24).\n \n \n \n Offering a second HIVST as an incentive within APS did not significantly impact HIV testing or first-time testing, although those opting for two kits reported it incentivized them to test.\n","PeriodicalId":508427,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Using Additional HIV Self-Test Kits as an Incentive to Increase HIV Testing within Assisted Partner Services\",\"authors\":\"Unmesha Roy Paladhi, David A. Katz, George Otieno, James P. Hughes, Harsha Thirumurthy, Harison Lagat, S. Masyuko, Monisha Sharma, P. Macharia, R. Bosire, M. Mugambi, Edward Kariithi, C. Farquhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/qai.0000000000003455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Incentives have shown mixed results in increasing HIV testing rates in low-resource settings. We investigated the effectiveness of offering additional self-tests (HIVSTs) as an incentive to increase testing among partners receiving assisted partner services.\\n \\n \\n \\n Western Kenya\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a single-crossover study nested within a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-four facilities were randomized 1:1 to 1) control: provider-delivered testing, or 2) intervention: offered one HIVST or provider-delivered testing for six months (pre-implementation), then switched to offering two HIVSTs for six months (post-implementation). A difference-in-differences approach using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for facility clustering and adjusting for age, sex, and income, was used to estimate the effect of the incentive on HIV testing and first-time testing among partners in APS.\\n \\n \\n \\n March 2021-June 2022, 1127 index clients received APS and named 8155 partners, among whom 2333 reported a prior HIV diagnosis and were excluded from analyses, resulting in 5822 remaining partners: 3646 (62.6%) and 2176 (37.4%) in the pre- and post-implementation periods respectively. Overall, 944/2176 (43%) partners were offered a second HIVST during post-implementation, of whom 34.3% picked up two kits, of whom 71.7% reported that the second kit encouraged HIV testing. Comparing partners offered one vs. two HIVSTs showed no difference in HIV testing (relative risk[RR]:1.01, 95%Confidence Interval[CI]:0.951-1.07) or HIV testing for the first time (RR:1.23, 95%CI:0.671-2.24).\\n \\n \\n \\n Offering a second HIVST as an incentive within APS did not significantly impact HIV testing or first-time testing, although those opting for two kits reported it incentivized them to test.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":\" 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000003455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000003455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在低资源环境中,激励措施对提高 HIV 检测率的效果好坏参半。我们研究了提供额外的自我检测(HIVST)作为激励措施,以提高接受伴侣辅助服务的伴侣的检测率的有效性。 肯尼亚西部 我们在分组随机对照试验中进行了一项单一交叉研究。24 家医疗机构按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到:1)对照组:由医疗机构提供检测;或 2)干预组:提供一次 HIVST 或由医疗机构提供检测,为期 6 个月(实施前),然后改为提供两次 HIVST,为期 6 个月(实施后)。采用广义线性混合模型的差分法,考虑设施集群并调整年龄、性别和收入,来估计激励措施对 APS 中伴侣的 HIV 检测和首次检测的影响。 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 6 月,1127 名指数客户接受了 APS,并指定了 8155 名伴侣,其中 2333 人报告了先前的 HIV 诊断并被排除在分析之外,因此剩下的伴侣为 5822 人:在实施前和实施后,分别有 3646 人(62.6%)和 2176 人(37.4%)的伴侣。总体而言,有 944/2176 人(43%)的伴侣在实施后接受了第二次艾滋病毒检测,其中 34.3% 的人领取了两套检测包,71.7% 的人表示第二套检测包鼓励了他们进行艾滋病毒检测。比较提供一次与两次 HIVST 的伴侣,结果显示在 HIV 检测(相对风险[RR]:1.01,95%置信区间[CI]:0.951-1.07)或首次 HIV 检测(RR:1.23,95%置信区间[CI]:0.671-2.24)方面没有差异。 在 APS 中提供第二套 HIVST 作为奖励措施对 HIV 检测或首次检测没有显著影响,尽管那些选择购买两套试剂盒的人称这激励了他们进行检测。
Effectiveness of Using Additional HIV Self-Test Kits as an Incentive to Increase HIV Testing within Assisted Partner Services
Incentives have shown mixed results in increasing HIV testing rates in low-resource settings. We investigated the effectiveness of offering additional self-tests (HIVSTs) as an incentive to increase testing among partners receiving assisted partner services.
Western Kenya
We conducted a single-crossover study nested within a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Twenty-four facilities were randomized 1:1 to 1) control: provider-delivered testing, or 2) intervention: offered one HIVST or provider-delivered testing for six months (pre-implementation), then switched to offering two HIVSTs for six months (post-implementation). A difference-in-differences approach using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for facility clustering and adjusting for age, sex, and income, was used to estimate the effect of the incentive on HIV testing and first-time testing among partners in APS.
March 2021-June 2022, 1127 index clients received APS and named 8155 partners, among whom 2333 reported a prior HIV diagnosis and were excluded from analyses, resulting in 5822 remaining partners: 3646 (62.6%) and 2176 (37.4%) in the pre- and post-implementation periods respectively. Overall, 944/2176 (43%) partners were offered a second HIVST during post-implementation, of whom 34.3% picked up two kits, of whom 71.7% reported that the second kit encouraged HIV testing. Comparing partners offered one vs. two HIVSTs showed no difference in HIV testing (relative risk[RR]:1.01, 95%Confidence Interval[CI]:0.951-1.07) or HIV testing for the first time (RR:1.23, 95%CI:0.671-2.24).
Offering a second HIVST as an incentive within APS did not significantly impact HIV testing or first-time testing, although those opting for two kits reported it incentivized them to test.