主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 RAS 抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭--与主动脉瓣置换术后的长期预后有关

Johan Hopfgarten, Stefan James, L. Lindhagen, T. Baron, Elisabeth Ståhle, C. Christersson
{"title":"主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 RAS 抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭--与主动脉瓣置换术后的长期预后有关","authors":"Johan Hopfgarten, Stefan James, L. Lindhagen, T. Baron, Elisabeth Ståhle, C. Christersson","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There is a lack of robust data on optimal medical treatment of heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis, with no randomized controlled trials guiding treatment.\n \n \n \n To study the association between exposure to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors or beta-blockers and outcome after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure.\n \n \n \n The study included all patients with heart failure undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Sweden between 2008-2016 (n = 4668 patients). Exposure to treatment was assessed by continuous tracking of drug dispensations and outcome events were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure collected from national patient registries. After adjustment for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction Cox regression analysis showed that RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51 - 0.65) and preserved LV-EF (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 - 0.85). Beta-blockade was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71–0.92), but not in preserved LV-EF (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 - 1.10). There was no association between RAS inhibition or beta-blockade and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure.\n \n \n \n RAS inhibition was associated with lower all-cause mortality after valve replacement in patients with both reduced and preserved LV-EF. Beta-blockade was associated with lower all-cause mortality only in patients with reduced LV-EF.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical treatment of heart failure with RAS inhibitors and beta blockers in aortic stenosis – association to long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement\",\"authors\":\"Johan Hopfgarten, Stefan James, L. Lindhagen, T. Baron, Elisabeth Ståhle, C. Christersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n There is a lack of robust data on optimal medical treatment of heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis, with no randomized controlled trials guiding treatment.\\n \\n \\n \\n To study the association between exposure to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors or beta-blockers and outcome after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study included all patients with heart failure undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Sweden between 2008-2016 (n = 4668 patients). Exposure to treatment was assessed by continuous tracking of drug dispensations and outcome events were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure collected from national patient registries. After adjustment for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction Cox regression analysis showed that RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51 - 0.65) and preserved LV-EF (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 - 0.85). Beta-blockade was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71–0.92), but not in preserved LV-EF (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 - 1.10). There was no association between RAS inhibition or beta-blockade and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure.\\n \\n \\n \\n RAS inhibition was associated with lower all-cause mortality after valve replacement in patients with both reduced and preserved LV-EF. Beta-blockade was associated with lower all-cause mortality only in patients with reduced LV-EF.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前缺乏关于重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者心力衰竭最佳治疗方法的可靠数据,也没有指导治疗的随机对照试验。 研究主动脉瓣狭窄和心力衰竭患者主动脉瓣置换术后肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAS)抑制剂或β-受体阻滞剂的暴露与预后之间的关系。 该研究纳入了2008-2016年间在瑞典因主动脉瓣狭窄而接受主动脉瓣置换术的所有心衰患者(n = 4668名患者)。通过对配药情况的连续跟踪评估治疗暴露情况,结果事件为全因死亡率和因心力衰竭住院,这些数据均来自全国患者登记处。在对年龄、性别、心房颤动、高血压、糖尿病和既往心肌梗死进行调整后,考克斯回归分析表明,RAS 抑制与 LV-EF 降低(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.51 - 0.65)和 LV-EF 保持(HR 0.69,95% CI 0.56 - 0.85)患者的全因死亡风险降低相关。在 LV-EF 降低的患者中,β-受体阻滞与较低的全因死亡风险相关(HR 0.81,95% CI 0.71-0.92),但在 LV-EF 保持的患者中,β-受体阻滞与较低的全因死亡风险无关(HR 0.87,95% CI 0.69 - 1.10)。RAS抑制或β-受体阻滞与心衰住院风险之间没有关联。 RAS抑制与LV-EF降低或保留的患者瓣膜置换术后全因死亡率降低有关。只有 LV-EF 降低的患者服用β-受体阻滞剂才会降低全因死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical treatment of heart failure with RAS inhibitors and beta blockers in aortic stenosis – association to long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement
There is a lack of robust data on optimal medical treatment of heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis, with no randomized controlled trials guiding treatment. To study the association between exposure to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors or beta-blockers and outcome after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure. The study included all patients with heart failure undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Sweden between 2008-2016 (n = 4668 patients). Exposure to treatment was assessed by continuous tracking of drug dispensations and outcome events were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure collected from national patient registries. After adjustment for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction Cox regression analysis showed that RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51 - 0.65) and preserved LV-EF (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56 - 0.85). Beta-blockade was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71–0.92), but not in preserved LV-EF (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 - 1.10). There was no association between RAS inhibition or beta-blockade and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure. RAS inhibition was associated with lower all-cause mortality after valve replacement in patients with both reduced and preserved LV-EF. Beta-blockade was associated with lower all-cause mortality only in patients with reduced LV-EF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信