神的体验:摆脱认知渗透的指控

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Omid Karimzadeh
{"title":"神的体验:摆脱认知渗透的指控","authors":"Omid Karimzadeh","doi":"10.1111/heyj.14311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By religious experiences I mean those human experiences characterised by a kind of intuitional seeming to the effect that a transcendent or all-encompassing being—God—exists. After explaining two significant similarities between religious and perceptual experiences, I will argue that the doctrine of phenomenal dogmatism about perceptual experiences can be applied to religious experiences as well. In the following two sections, the challenge arising from the objection from cognitive penetration is extended to the case of religious experiences. I show that the importance of this challenge may be dependent on a debate over the proper content of experience—namely the debate over low-level vs. high-level content. In the subsequent section, I argue that even if the religious experience is deemed an experience with low-level content, then the charge of cognitive penetration may not be avoided. Drawing upon the doctrine of divine simplicity, in the penultimate section, I argue that the experience of God has a specific characteristic which, in companion with its thin content, enables it to escape the charge of cognitive penetration. Alternatively put, the experience of God possesses an important epistemological advantage owing to its distinctive object, which makes it significantly reliable. In the final section, three possible objections are briefly addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54105,"journal":{"name":"HEYTHROP JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EXPERIENCE OF GOD: ESCAPING THE CHARGE OF COGNITIVE PENETRATION\",\"authors\":\"Omid Karimzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/heyj.14311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>By religious experiences I mean those human experiences characterised by a kind of intuitional seeming to the effect that a transcendent or all-encompassing being—God—exists. After explaining two significant similarities between religious and perceptual experiences, I will argue that the doctrine of phenomenal dogmatism about perceptual experiences can be applied to religious experiences as well. In the following two sections, the challenge arising from the objection from cognitive penetration is extended to the case of religious experiences. I show that the importance of this challenge may be dependent on a debate over the proper content of experience—namely the debate over low-level vs. high-level content. In the subsequent section, I argue that even if the religious experience is deemed an experience with low-level content, then the charge of cognitive penetration may not be avoided. Drawing upon the doctrine of divine simplicity, in the penultimate section, I argue that the experience of God has a specific characteristic which, in companion with its thin content, enables it to escape the charge of cognitive penetration. Alternatively put, the experience of God possesses an important epistemological advantage owing to its distinctive object, which makes it significantly reliable. In the final section, three possible objections are briefly addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HEYTHROP JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HEYTHROP JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/heyj.14311\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEYTHROP JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/heyj.14311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我所说的宗教体验是指那些以一种直观的似乎为特征的人类体验,其大意是一个超验的或包罗万象的存在--神--的存在。在解释了宗教体验与知觉体验之间的两个重要相似之处之后,我将论证关于知觉体验的现象学教条主义学说也可适用于宗教体验。在接下来的两节中,来自认知渗透的反对意见所提出的挑战将被扩展到宗教体验的案例中。我表明,这一挑战的重要性可能取决于关于经验的适当内容的争论--即关于低层次内容与高层次内容的争论。在随后的章节中,我将论证,即使宗教体验被认为是一种具有低层次内容的体验,也可能无法避免认知渗透的指控。在倒数第二节中,我借鉴神性简约学说,认为神的体验有一个特定的特点,这个特点与其单薄的内容相伴,使其能够摆脱认知渗透的指控。换句话说,上帝的经验因其独特的对象而具有重要的认识论优势,这使它非常可靠。最后一节将简要讨论三种可能的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EXPERIENCE OF GOD: ESCAPING THE CHARGE OF COGNITIVE PENETRATION

By religious experiences I mean those human experiences characterised by a kind of intuitional seeming to the effect that a transcendent or all-encompassing being—God—exists. After explaining two significant similarities between religious and perceptual experiences, I will argue that the doctrine of phenomenal dogmatism about perceptual experiences can be applied to religious experiences as well. In the following two sections, the challenge arising from the objection from cognitive penetration is extended to the case of religious experiences. I show that the importance of this challenge may be dependent on a debate over the proper content of experience—namely the debate over low-level vs. high-level content. In the subsequent section, I argue that even if the religious experience is deemed an experience with low-level content, then the charge of cognitive penetration may not be avoided. Drawing upon the doctrine of divine simplicity, in the penultimate section, I argue that the experience of God has a specific characteristic which, in companion with its thin content, enables it to escape the charge of cognitive penetration. Alternatively put, the experience of God possesses an important epistemological advantage owing to its distinctive object, which makes it significantly reliable. In the final section, three possible objections are briefly addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HEYTHROP JOURNAL
HEYTHROP JOURNAL Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Founded on the conviction that the disciplines of theology and philosophy have much to gain from their mutual interaction, The Heythrop Journal provides a medium of publication for scholars in each of these fields and encourages interdisciplinary comment and debate. The Heythrop Journal embraces all the disciplines which contribute to theological and philosophical research, notably hermeneutics, exegesis, linguistics, history, religious studies, philosophy of religion, sociology, psychology, ethics and pastoral theology. The Heythrop Journal is invaluable for scholars, teachers, students and general readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信