"我们信任比特币从人类学角度看作为算法乌托邦的比特币

Nina Kulenović
{"title":"\"我们信任比特币从人类学角度看作为算法乌托邦的比特币","authors":"Nina Kulenović","doi":"10.21301/eap.v19i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to contextualize briefly the emergence and development of Bitcoin as well as to offer an anthropological analysis of one such \"algorithmic utopia\" known as Bitcoin. Bitcoin was officially \"born\" in 2009. Its foundation was laid by the so-called white paper titled \"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System\" (2008), authored by Satoshi Nakamoto, a pseudonym for an individual or a group of individuals. In essence, the intention of its creator (or creators) was to solve the technical problem of so-called double-spending of money, aiming to avoid reliance on a third party or institution (such as a bank) and the consequent loss of privacy for its users, with the help of an algorithm called blockchain. Although Bitcoin can be viewed in continuity with movements such as crypto-anarchism and cypherpunk, whose roots trace back to the 1980s of the twentieth century, and although it is not the first cryptocurrency nor the first alternative to fiat money, Bitcoin is indeed the first cryptocurrency to have attracted broader attention in both public and academic discourse. This paper will shed light on the context in which Bitcoin was born and popularized, and will endeavor to defend the assumption that the popular imagination behind the Bitcoin currency is technoutopian. Finally, this paper will seek to demonstrate that the algorithm at the very core of Bitcoin is perceived not only as the fulfillment of an Enlightenment dream of a method itself as a non-cultural and supra-historical guarantor of objectivity (as the one) removed from politics, economy and ideology but also as a democratization method applicable to them all. Apart from the mentioned above, the paper concludes that Bitcoin is seen as the fulfillment of a modernist dream of efficient, formal, predictable, depersonalized bureaucracies in the context of the diminished legitimacy of centralized, hierarchically structured, sluggish, fallible, and abuse-prone economic and state institutions. The focus of trust shifts to technology: to an algorithm seen as self-regulating, efficient, free from ideology, subjective interests, and potential abuse, almost divinely infallible, decentralized, and democratic system that provides a group of individuals not only with the necessary tools to achieve their freedom and privacy, deprived from control and regulations, but also as a tool for reforming the political and economic system.","PeriodicalId":515445,"journal":{"name":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“In Bitcoin We Trust\\\": An Anthropological Approach to Bitcoin as Algorithmic Utopia\",\"authors\":\"Nina Kulenović\",\"doi\":\"10.21301/eap.v19i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to contextualize briefly the emergence and development of Bitcoin as well as to offer an anthropological analysis of one such \\\"algorithmic utopia\\\" known as Bitcoin. Bitcoin was officially \\\"born\\\" in 2009. Its foundation was laid by the so-called white paper titled \\\"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System\\\" (2008), authored by Satoshi Nakamoto, a pseudonym for an individual or a group of individuals. In essence, the intention of its creator (or creators) was to solve the technical problem of so-called double-spending of money, aiming to avoid reliance on a third party or institution (such as a bank) and the consequent loss of privacy for its users, with the help of an algorithm called blockchain. Although Bitcoin can be viewed in continuity with movements such as crypto-anarchism and cypherpunk, whose roots trace back to the 1980s of the twentieth century, and although it is not the first cryptocurrency nor the first alternative to fiat money, Bitcoin is indeed the first cryptocurrency to have attracted broader attention in both public and academic discourse. This paper will shed light on the context in which Bitcoin was born and popularized, and will endeavor to defend the assumption that the popular imagination behind the Bitcoin currency is technoutopian. Finally, this paper will seek to demonstrate that the algorithm at the very core of Bitcoin is perceived not only as the fulfillment of an Enlightenment dream of a method itself as a non-cultural and supra-historical guarantor of objectivity (as the one) removed from politics, economy and ideology but also as a democratization method applicable to them all. Apart from the mentioned above, the paper concludes that Bitcoin is seen as the fulfillment of a modernist dream of efficient, formal, predictable, depersonalized bureaucracies in the context of the diminished legitimacy of centralized, hierarchically structured, sluggish, fallible, and abuse-prone economic and state institutions. The focus of trust shifts to technology: to an algorithm seen as self-regulating, efficient, free from ideology, subjective interests, and potential abuse, almost divinely infallible, decentralized, and democratic system that provides a group of individuals not only with the necessary tools to achieve their freedom and privacy, deprived from control and regulations, but also as a tool for reforming the political and economic system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v19i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在简要介绍比特币出现和发展的背景,并对比特币这一 "算法乌托邦 "进行人类学分析。比特币于 2009 年正式 "诞生"。中本聪(Satoshi Nakamoto)是一个人或一群人的化名,他在 2008 年发表了题为《比特币:点对点电子现金系统》的白皮书,为比特币的诞生奠定了基础。从本质上讲,其创造者(或多个创造者)的意图是借助一种称为区块链的算法,解决所谓的货币重复消费的技术问题,旨在避免对第三方或机构(如银行)的依赖,以及由此导致的用户隐私权的丧失。虽然比特币与密码无政府主义和密码朋克等运动一脉相承,其根源可追溯到 20 世纪 80 年代,虽然比特币不是第一种加密货币,也不是法币的第一种替代品,但比特币确实是第一种在公众和学术界引起广泛关注的加密货币。本文将阐明比特币诞生和普及的背景,并将努力捍卫比特币货币背后的大众想象是技术乌托邦的假设。最后,本文将试图证明,比特币的核心算法不仅被视为实现了启蒙运动关于方法本身的梦想,是一种非文化和超历史的客观性保证(作为一种),脱离了政治、经济和意识形态,而且还是一种适用于所有这些领域的民主化方法。除上述内容外,本文的结论是,在中央集权、等级结构、迟缓、易错、易滥用的经济和国家机构的合法性减弱的背景下,比特币被视为实现了现代主义对高效、正规、可预测、非人格化的官僚机构的梦想。信任的焦点转向了技术:一种被视为自我调节、高效、不受意识形态、主观利益和潜在滥用影响的算法,几乎是无懈可击、去中心化和民主的系统,它不仅为一群人提供了实现自由和隐私的必要工具,剥夺了他们的控制和监管,而且还是改革政治和经济制度的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“In Bitcoin We Trust": An Anthropological Approach to Bitcoin as Algorithmic Utopia
The aim of this paper is to contextualize briefly the emergence and development of Bitcoin as well as to offer an anthropological analysis of one such "algorithmic utopia" known as Bitcoin. Bitcoin was officially "born" in 2009. Its foundation was laid by the so-called white paper titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" (2008), authored by Satoshi Nakamoto, a pseudonym for an individual or a group of individuals. In essence, the intention of its creator (or creators) was to solve the technical problem of so-called double-spending of money, aiming to avoid reliance on a third party or institution (such as a bank) and the consequent loss of privacy for its users, with the help of an algorithm called blockchain. Although Bitcoin can be viewed in continuity with movements such as crypto-anarchism and cypherpunk, whose roots trace back to the 1980s of the twentieth century, and although it is not the first cryptocurrency nor the first alternative to fiat money, Bitcoin is indeed the first cryptocurrency to have attracted broader attention in both public and academic discourse. This paper will shed light on the context in which Bitcoin was born and popularized, and will endeavor to defend the assumption that the popular imagination behind the Bitcoin currency is technoutopian. Finally, this paper will seek to demonstrate that the algorithm at the very core of Bitcoin is perceived not only as the fulfillment of an Enlightenment dream of a method itself as a non-cultural and supra-historical guarantor of objectivity (as the one) removed from politics, economy and ideology but also as a democratization method applicable to them all. Apart from the mentioned above, the paper concludes that Bitcoin is seen as the fulfillment of a modernist dream of efficient, formal, predictable, depersonalized bureaucracies in the context of the diminished legitimacy of centralized, hierarchically structured, sluggish, fallible, and abuse-prone economic and state institutions. The focus of trust shifts to technology: to an algorithm seen as self-regulating, efficient, free from ideology, subjective interests, and potential abuse, almost divinely infallible, decentralized, and democratic system that provides a group of individuals not only with the necessary tools to achieve their freedom and privacy, deprived from control and regulations, but also as a tool for reforming the political and economic system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信