杀真菌剂对由 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides 引起的芒果炭疽病的体外评估

Sana Inayat, Asad Ullah, Adeeba Anwar, Aneesa Kaleem
{"title":"杀真菌剂对由 Colletotrichum gloeosporioides 引起的芒果炭疽病的体外评估","authors":"Sana Inayat, Asad Ullah, Adeeba Anwar, Aneesa Kaleem","doi":"10.11648/j.ajbls.20241202.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mango is a significant fruit crop in our country, but it is often attacked by anthracnose, a disease that causes considerable pre and post-harvest losses. There are different methods to control this disease but management through the use of various fungicides, often in combination is more suitablef, under field conditions. This study was conducted in vitro experiments using the poison food technique to induce anthracnose disease in mangoes. Efficacy of 10 different fungicides was investigated, including contact fungicides like Blitox (Copper oxychloride 50% WP) and Indofil M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP), as well as systemic fungicides like Topsin-M 70 WP (Thiophanate-M methyl 70% WP), Amistar Top (Difenconazole @ 12.5%), Aliette (Fosetyl Aluminium 80%), Score (Difenconazole @ 25% EC), Meriman (Captan WP 50%), Tilt (Propiconazole 25% EC), mirador (Azoxystrobin @ 20%), and Native (Tebuconazole+ Trifloxystrobin 75% WG). These fungicides were tested at three concentrations (0.05, 0.1, and 0.15) to evaluate their effectiveness in inhibiting the growth of <i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>, the causal agent of anthracnose in mangoes. The results of this study showed that among the fungicides tested, Tilt (Propiconazole 25% WP), a systemic fungicide, exhibited superior inhibition, achieving complete 50 percent mycelial inhibition and preventing sporulation across all three concentrations. In contrast, Meriman (Captan WP 50%) showed the lowest inhibition, at 31.57 percent, compared to the other fungicides tested. These findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate fungicide for effective management of anthracnose in mango crops.\n","PeriodicalId":7857,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Evaluation of Fungicides Against Mango Anthracnose Caused by <i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>\",\"authors\":\"Sana Inayat, Asad Ullah, Adeeba Anwar, Aneesa Kaleem\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/j.ajbls.20241202.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mango is a significant fruit crop in our country, but it is often attacked by anthracnose, a disease that causes considerable pre and post-harvest losses. There are different methods to control this disease but management through the use of various fungicides, often in combination is more suitablef, under field conditions. This study was conducted in vitro experiments using the poison food technique to induce anthracnose disease in mangoes. Efficacy of 10 different fungicides was investigated, including contact fungicides like Blitox (Copper oxychloride 50% WP) and Indofil M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP), as well as systemic fungicides like Topsin-M 70 WP (Thiophanate-M methyl 70% WP), Amistar Top (Difenconazole @ 12.5%), Aliette (Fosetyl Aluminium 80%), Score (Difenconazole @ 25% EC), Meriman (Captan WP 50%), Tilt (Propiconazole 25% EC), mirador (Azoxystrobin @ 20%), and Native (Tebuconazole+ Trifloxystrobin 75% WG). These fungicides were tested at three concentrations (0.05, 0.1, and 0.15) to evaluate their effectiveness in inhibiting the growth of <i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>, the causal agent of anthracnose in mangoes. The results of this study showed that among the fungicides tested, Tilt (Propiconazole 25% WP), a systemic fungicide, exhibited superior inhibition, achieving complete 50 percent mycelial inhibition and preventing sporulation across all three concentrations. In contrast, Meriman (Captan WP 50%) showed the lowest inhibition, at 31.57 percent, compared to the other fungicides tested. These findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate fungicide for effective management of anthracnose in mango crops.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":7857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20241202.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20241202.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

芒果是我国重要的水果作物,但它经常受到炭疽病的侵袭,这种病害会在收获前后造成相当大的损失。有不同的方法可以控制这种病害,但在田间条件下,通过使用各种杀菌剂(通常是联合使用)进行管理更为合适。本研究采用毒食技术进行体外实验,诱导芒果发生炭疽病。研究了 10 种不同杀菌剂的药效,包括 Blitox(氧氯化铜 50%可湿性粉剂)和 Indofil M-45(代森锰锌 75%可湿性粉剂)等接触型杀菌剂,以及 Topsin-M 70 WP(甲基硫菌灵 70%可湿性粉剂)、Amistar Top(二苯醚甲环唑 @ 12.5%)、Aliette(氟硅铝 80%)、Score(二苯醚甲环唑 25%乳油)、Meriman(克菌丹可湿性粉剂 50%)、Tilt(丙环唑 25%乳油)、mirador(唑螨酯 20%)和 Native(戊唑醇+三唑醇 75%乳油)等内吸性杀菌剂。对这些杀菌剂进行了三种浓度(0.05、0.1 和 0.15)的测试,以评估它们在抑制芒果炭疽病病原菌球孢子菌(Colletotrichum gloeosporioides)生长方面的效果。研究结果表明,在测试的杀菌剂中,系统性杀菌剂 Tilt(丙环唑 25% WP)的抑制效果较好,在所有三种浓度下都能完全抑制 50% 的菌丝并阻止孢子的产生。相比之下,Meriman(克菌丹可湿性粉剂 50%)的抑制率最低,仅为 31.57%。这些发现强调了选择适当的杀菌剂对有效防治芒果炭疽病的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Evaluation of Fungicides Against Mango Anthracnose Caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Mango is a significant fruit crop in our country, but it is often attacked by anthracnose, a disease that causes considerable pre and post-harvest losses. There are different methods to control this disease but management through the use of various fungicides, often in combination is more suitablef, under field conditions. This study was conducted in vitro experiments using the poison food technique to induce anthracnose disease in mangoes. Efficacy of 10 different fungicides was investigated, including contact fungicides like Blitox (Copper oxychloride 50% WP) and Indofil M-45 (Mancozeb 75% WP), as well as systemic fungicides like Topsin-M 70 WP (Thiophanate-M methyl 70% WP), Amistar Top (Difenconazole @ 12.5%), Aliette (Fosetyl Aluminium 80%), Score (Difenconazole @ 25% EC), Meriman (Captan WP 50%), Tilt (Propiconazole 25% EC), mirador (Azoxystrobin @ 20%), and Native (Tebuconazole+ Trifloxystrobin 75% WG). These fungicides were tested at three concentrations (0.05, 0.1, and 0.15) to evaluate their effectiveness in inhibiting the growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the causal agent of anthracnose in mangoes. The results of this study showed that among the fungicides tested, Tilt (Propiconazole 25% WP), a systemic fungicide, exhibited superior inhibition, achieving complete 50 percent mycelial inhibition and preventing sporulation across all three concentrations. In contrast, Meriman (Captan WP 50%) showed the lowest inhibition, at 31.57 percent, compared to the other fungicides tested. These findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate fungicide for effective management of anthracnose in mango crops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信