减少应急车辆车顶灯条的空气阻力

IF 1.8 Q3 MECHANICS
Fluids Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.3390/fluids9050113
Michael Gerard Connolly, Malachy J. O’Rourke, Alojz Ivankovic
{"title":"减少应急车辆车顶灯条的空气阻力","authors":"Michael Gerard Connolly, Malachy J. O’Rourke, Alojz Ivankovic","doi":"10.3390/fluids9050113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of contemporary lightbars on vehicle fuel efficiency with a focus on quantifying their effects on fuel consumption and exploring strategies to improve drag performance through modifications. Simulations showed an 8–11% increase in drag for square-back vehicles, with greater penalties outlined for vehicles with rear-slanting roofs. Given the moderate drag increase, the impact on the driving range, especially for electric vehicles, remains minimal, supporting the continued use of external lightbars. Positioning experiments suggest marginal drag reductions when lowering the lightbar to its lowest position due to additional drag effects that can be caused by the mounting mechanism in its condensed form. Angling the lightbar showed negligible drag increases up to an angle of 2.5 degrees, but beyond that, a 4% increase in drag was observed for every additional 2.5 degrees. Additionally, fitting drag-reducing ramps ahead of the lightbar yielded no significant drag savings. Noise analysis identified that the lightbar’s wake and rear surfaces were responsible for the largest production of noise. The optimal lightbar design was found to incorporate overflow rather than underflow and rear tapering in sync with roof curvature. Appendable clip-on devices for the lightbar, particularly rear clip-ons, demonstrated appreciable drag reductions of up to 2.5%. A final optimised lightbar design produced a minimal 2.8% drag increase when fitted onto an unmarked vehicle, representing a threefold improvement compared with the current generation of lightbars. This study advances the field of lightbar aerodynamics by precisely quantifying drag effects by using highly detailed geometry and examines the significance of optimal positioning, angle adjustment, and appendable clip-on devices in greater depth than any existing published work.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Aerodynamic Drag on Roof-Mounted Lightbars for Emergency Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Michael Gerard Connolly, Malachy J. O’Rourke, Alojz Ivankovic\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fluids9050113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of contemporary lightbars on vehicle fuel efficiency with a focus on quantifying their effects on fuel consumption and exploring strategies to improve drag performance through modifications. Simulations showed an 8–11% increase in drag for square-back vehicles, with greater penalties outlined for vehicles with rear-slanting roofs. Given the moderate drag increase, the impact on the driving range, especially for electric vehicles, remains minimal, supporting the continued use of external lightbars. Positioning experiments suggest marginal drag reductions when lowering the lightbar to its lowest position due to additional drag effects that can be caused by the mounting mechanism in its condensed form. Angling the lightbar showed negligible drag increases up to an angle of 2.5 degrees, but beyond that, a 4% increase in drag was observed for every additional 2.5 degrees. Additionally, fitting drag-reducing ramps ahead of the lightbar yielded no significant drag savings. Noise analysis identified that the lightbar’s wake and rear surfaces were responsible for the largest production of noise. The optimal lightbar design was found to incorporate overflow rather than underflow and rear tapering in sync with roof curvature. Appendable clip-on devices for the lightbar, particularly rear clip-ons, demonstrated appreciable drag reductions of up to 2.5%. A final optimised lightbar design produced a minimal 2.8% drag increase when fitted onto an unmarked vehicle, representing a threefold improvement compared with the current generation of lightbars. This study advances the field of lightbar aerodynamics by precisely quantifying drag effects by using highly detailed geometry and examines the significance of optimal positioning, angle adjustment, and appendable clip-on devices in greater depth than any existing published work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了现代灯条对汽车燃油效率的影响,重点是量化灯条对油耗的影响,并探索通过改装提高阻力性能的策略。模拟结果表明,方背式车辆的阻力增加了 8%-11%,而后倾式车顶车辆的阻力损失更大。考虑到阻力的适度增加,对行驶里程的影响仍然很小,尤其是对电动汽车而言,因此支持继续使用外部灯条。定位实验表明,将灯条降到最低位置时,阻力的减少微乎其微,这是因为安装机构在压缩状态下会产生额外的阻力效应。将灯条倾斜至 2.5 度时,阻力的增加可以忽略不计,但超过这个角度后,每增加 2.5 度,阻力就会增加 4%。此外,在灯杆前方安装减阻斜坡也没有明显降低阻力。噪音分析表明,灯条的尾流和后表面产生的噪音最大。研究发现,最佳的灯条设计是采用溢流而不是底流,以及与车顶弧度同步的后部锥形。灯条的附加夹子装置,尤其是后夹子装置,可明显减少阻力达 2.5%。最终优化的灯条设计在安装到无标志车辆上时,阻力增加幅度最小为 2.8%,与当前一代灯条相比提高了三倍。这项研究通过使用高度详细的几何图形精确量化阻力效应,并比任何现有发表的研究更深入地研究了最佳定位、角度调整和可附加夹子装置的重要性,从而推动了灯条空气动力学领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Aerodynamic Drag on Roof-Mounted Lightbars for Emergency Vehicles
This paper investigates the impact of contemporary lightbars on vehicle fuel efficiency with a focus on quantifying their effects on fuel consumption and exploring strategies to improve drag performance through modifications. Simulations showed an 8–11% increase in drag for square-back vehicles, with greater penalties outlined for vehicles with rear-slanting roofs. Given the moderate drag increase, the impact on the driving range, especially for electric vehicles, remains minimal, supporting the continued use of external lightbars. Positioning experiments suggest marginal drag reductions when lowering the lightbar to its lowest position due to additional drag effects that can be caused by the mounting mechanism in its condensed form. Angling the lightbar showed negligible drag increases up to an angle of 2.5 degrees, but beyond that, a 4% increase in drag was observed for every additional 2.5 degrees. Additionally, fitting drag-reducing ramps ahead of the lightbar yielded no significant drag savings. Noise analysis identified that the lightbar’s wake and rear surfaces were responsible for the largest production of noise. The optimal lightbar design was found to incorporate overflow rather than underflow and rear tapering in sync with roof curvature. Appendable clip-on devices for the lightbar, particularly rear clip-ons, demonstrated appreciable drag reductions of up to 2.5%. A final optimised lightbar design produced a minimal 2.8% drag increase when fitted onto an unmarked vehicle, representing a threefold improvement compared with the current generation of lightbars. This study advances the field of lightbar aerodynamics by precisely quantifying drag effects by using highly detailed geometry and examines the significance of optimal positioning, angle adjustment, and appendable clip-on devices in greater depth than any existing published work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids
Fluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
326
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信