成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务是一个普通法问题

A. Kuchuk
{"title":"成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务是一个普通法问题","authors":"A. Kuchuk","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is determined by insufficient study of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents and the necessity to clarify the general and legal characteristics of this duty. It is substantiated that the basis for understanding the issue of the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the understanding of the legal obligation as such an appropriate behavior involving either the conscious voluntary assumption of the corresponding obligation, or the conscious consent of the person to the presence of a corresponding obligation; a legal prescription alone is not enough (such a legal prescription should be perceived by a person as necessary, just, etc.). It is emphasized that the general and theoretical understanding of the issue of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the basis for the sectoral regulation of relevant relations. Herewith, the basis of such consideration is the distinction between moral obligation and legal obligation (the difference between the right and an ordinary coercion). \nThe contradictions of the legislation's provisions regarding the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents in the context of legal capacity, as well as the institution of civil liability of the owner of the source of increased danger, are analyzed. \nThe nature of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents differs from the legal duty to protect the Motherland (which arises under similar conditions) is characterized. Attention is focused on the lack of full conscious perception of the first, its indefiniteness, failure to take into account individual peculiarities of implementation, etc. The expediency of taking into account of the state's social obligations when determining the content of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents is noted.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":" 929","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The obligation of adult children to take care of their disabled parents as a common law problem\",\"authors\":\"A. Kuchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the study is determined by insufficient study of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents and the necessity to clarify the general and legal characteristics of this duty. It is substantiated that the basis for understanding the issue of the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the understanding of the legal obligation as such an appropriate behavior involving either the conscious voluntary assumption of the corresponding obligation, or the conscious consent of the person to the presence of a corresponding obligation; a legal prescription alone is not enough (such a legal prescription should be perceived by a person as necessary, just, etc.). It is emphasized that the general and theoretical understanding of the issue of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the basis for the sectoral regulation of relevant relations. Herewith, the basis of such consideration is the distinction between moral obligation and legal obligation (the difference between the right and an ordinary coercion). \\nThe contradictions of the legislation's provisions regarding the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents in the context of legal capacity, as well as the institution of civil liability of the owner of the source of increased danger, are analyzed. \\nThe nature of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents differs from the legal duty to protect the Motherland (which arises under similar conditions) is characterized. Attention is focused on the lack of full conscious perception of the first, its indefiniteness, failure to take into account individual peculiarities of implementation, etc. The expediency of taking into account of the state's social obligations when determining the content of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents is noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\" 929\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务研究不足,以及有必要明确这一义务的一般和法律特征,决定了本研究的相关性。研究证实,理解成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务问题的基础应该是将法律义务理解为一种适当的行为,这种行为要么涉及自觉自愿承担相应的义务,要么涉及个人对存在相应义务的自觉同意;仅有法律规定是不够的(这种法律规定应被个人视为必要、公正等)。需要强调的是,对成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务问题的一般理论认识,应成为部门规范相关关系的基础。因此,这种考虑的基础是道德义务和法律义务之间的区别(权利和普通强制之间的区别)。分析了在法律行为能力范围内,关于成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务的法律规定的矛盾之处,以及危险源所有者的民事责任制度。分析了成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务与保护祖国的法定义务(在类似条件下产生)的不同性质。重点关注的是对第一项义务缺乏充分的自觉认识、其不确定性、在执行时没有考虑到个人的特殊性等问题。在确定成年子女照顾残疾父母的义务内容时,应考虑到国家的社会义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The obligation of adult children to take care of their disabled parents as a common law problem
The relevance of the study is determined by insufficient study of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents and the necessity to clarify the general and legal characteristics of this duty. It is substantiated that the basis for understanding the issue of the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the understanding of the legal obligation as such an appropriate behavior involving either the conscious voluntary assumption of the corresponding obligation, or the conscious consent of the person to the presence of a corresponding obligation; a legal prescription alone is not enough (such a legal prescription should be perceived by a person as necessary, just, etc.). It is emphasized that the general and theoretical understanding of the issue of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents should be the basis for the sectoral regulation of relevant relations. Herewith, the basis of such consideration is the distinction between moral obligation and legal obligation (the difference between the right and an ordinary coercion). The contradictions of the legislation's provisions regarding the obligation of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents in the context of legal capacity, as well as the institution of civil liability of the owner of the source of increased danger, are analyzed. The nature of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents differs from the legal duty to protect the Motherland (which arises under similar conditions) is characterized. Attention is focused on the lack of full conscious perception of the first, its indefiniteness, failure to take into account individual peculiarities of implementation, etc. The expediency of taking into account of the state's social obligations when determining the content of the duty of children who have reached the full age to take care of disabled parents is noted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信