乌克兰人民代表诉乌克兰案审前调查之初辩护职能的实质

V. Hryhoruk
{"title":"乌克兰人民代表诉乌克兰案审前调查之初辩护职能的实质","authors":"V. Hryhoruk","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific article explores the essence of the defense function at the beginning of the pre­trial investigation concerning a member of the Parliament of Ukraine. The relevance of the chosen topic is justified by the pivotal role that Ukrainian MPs play in the country's political and legislative life, with their defense function at the initial stage of investigation being crucial for safeguarding the constitutional rights of government representatives and maintaining citizens' trust in the institution of elected officials. \nThe paper defines the defense function in criminal proceedings, highlighting its peculiarities and differences from other functions of criminal procedure. The author also delves into the legal basis for implementing the defense function at the outset of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, particularly emphasizing the intricacies of initiating such an investigation during a state of war. It is underscored that errors made by authorized individuals at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation may lead to unjustified arrest, prosecution of innocent individuals, or impunity for perpetrators, hence the importance of providing a Member of Parliament with legal defense at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation, justified by their unique status in the state. Additionally, the paper draws attention to the fact that involving a defense attorney in criminal proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation serves the interests of both the suspect and the investigating party, as it allows the suspect to receive qualified legal assistance, fully exercise their rights, formulate mitigating circumstances more substantively, and justify their defense strategy. \nBased on the research findings, the author concludes that the defense function at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament manifests in two forms: 1) the independent protection of rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests by the Member of Parliament, and 2) the protection of the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of the Member of Parliament by a defense attorney in criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"125 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The essence of the defense function at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation in ralation of the People’s Deputy of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"V. Hryhoruk\",\"doi\":\"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scientific article explores the essence of the defense function at the beginning of the pre­trial investigation concerning a member of the Parliament of Ukraine. The relevance of the chosen topic is justified by the pivotal role that Ukrainian MPs play in the country's political and legislative life, with their defense function at the initial stage of investigation being crucial for safeguarding the constitutional rights of government representatives and maintaining citizens' trust in the institution of elected officials. \\nThe paper defines the defense function in criminal proceedings, highlighting its peculiarities and differences from other functions of criminal procedure. The author also delves into the legal basis for implementing the defense function at the outset of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, particularly emphasizing the intricacies of initiating such an investigation during a state of war. It is underscored that errors made by authorized individuals at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation may lead to unjustified arrest, prosecution of innocent individuals, or impunity for perpetrators, hence the importance of providing a Member of Parliament with legal defense at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation, justified by their unique status in the state. Additionally, the paper draws attention to the fact that involving a defense attorney in criminal proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation serves the interests of both the suspect and the investigating party, as it allows the suspect to receive qualified legal assistance, fully exercise their rights, formulate mitigating circumstances more substantively, and justify their defense strategy. \\nBased on the research findings, the author concludes that the defense function at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament manifests in two forms: 1) the independent protection of rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests by the Member of Parliament, and 2) the protection of the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of the Member of Parliament by a defense attorney in criminal proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\"125 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇学术论文探讨了乌克兰议员在审前调查初期的辩护职能的实质。选题的相关性在于乌克兰议员在国家政治和立法生活中发挥着关键作用,他们在调查初期的辩护职能对于保障政府代表的宪法权利和维护公民对民选官员机构的信任至关重要。本文界定了刑事诉讼中的辩护职能,强调了其特殊性以及与刑事诉讼其他职能的区别。作者还深入探讨了在对乌克兰议会议员进行审前调查之初履行辩护职能的法律依据,特别强调了在战争状态下启动此类调查的复杂性。本文强调,受权个人在审前调查初始阶段所犯的错误可能导致无理逮捕、起诉无辜个人或犯罪者逍遥法外,因此在审前调查初始阶段为议员提供法律辩护非常重要,这也是议员在国家中的独特地位所决定的。此外,本文还提请注意,在调查初期让辩护律师参与刑事诉讼符合嫌疑人和调查方的利益,因为这可以让嫌疑人获得合格的法律援助,充分行使其权利,更实质性地提出减轻罪行的情节,并证明其辩护策略的合理性。根据研究结果,作者得出结论,在涉及乌克兰议员的审前调查之初,辩护职能表现为两种形式:1)议员独立保护权利、自由和合法利益;2)辩护律师在刑事诉讼中保护议员的权利、自由和合法利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The essence of the defense function at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation in ralation of the People’s Deputy of Ukraine
The scientific article explores the essence of the defense function at the beginning of the pre­trial investigation concerning a member of the Parliament of Ukraine. The relevance of the chosen topic is justified by the pivotal role that Ukrainian MPs play in the country's political and legislative life, with their defense function at the initial stage of investigation being crucial for safeguarding the constitutional rights of government representatives and maintaining citizens' trust in the institution of elected officials. The paper defines the defense function in criminal proceedings, highlighting its peculiarities and differences from other functions of criminal procedure. The author also delves into the legal basis for implementing the defense function at the outset of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, particularly emphasizing the intricacies of initiating such an investigation during a state of war. It is underscored that errors made by authorized individuals at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation may lead to unjustified arrest, prosecution of innocent individuals, or impunity for perpetrators, hence the importance of providing a Member of Parliament with legal defense at the initial stage of the pre-trial investigation, justified by their unique status in the state. Additionally, the paper draws attention to the fact that involving a defense attorney in criminal proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation serves the interests of both the suspect and the investigating party, as it allows the suspect to receive qualified legal assistance, fully exercise their rights, formulate mitigating circumstances more substantively, and justify their defense strategy. Based on the research findings, the author concludes that the defense function at the beginning of the pre-trial investigation concerning a member of the Ukrainian Parliament manifests in two forms: 1) the independent protection of rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests by the Member of Parliament, and 2) the protection of the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of the Member of Parliament by a defense attorney in criminal proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信