从神经人格角度探讨认知安全问题,将其作为 IT 专家工作社会化的必要条件

{"title":"从神经人格角度探讨认知安全问题,将其作为 IT 专家工作社会化的必要条件","authors":"","doi":"10.37096/shdisj-23-1.1-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post-classical paradigm of understanding the system of personality potentials due to virtualization and informatization of most spheres of natural life emphasizes the need to rethink the many positions of determining personal development and resourcefulness of specialists. The conceptual principles of cognitive security research of specialists in the field of IT technologies, whose professional activity is directly related to information culture, information, and cognitive security of others, need to be clarified.\nMethodology. An empirical study was conducted on two randomized groups of IT specialists. The groups are differentiated according to the criterion of professional experience. Accordingly, two groups were formed: EG1 (n 76) - IT specialists with experience of up to five years and group EG2 (n 83) - IT specialists with experience of more than five years (6-10 years). To generalize the structure of the relationship of categories that reveal the range of factors of cognitive-stylistic determination and neurodynamic conditionality of cognitive security of IT specialists, an expert evaluation was conducted. Research technology involved the assessment of IT experts (22 specialists with 15-22 years of experience) the importance of parameters that identified three main strategies for cognitive security of IT specialists\nResults. Sixteen neuropersonality types of solving professional problems and ensuring cognitive security of IT specialists differentiated by professional experience were identified. Three strategies of cognitive security of IT specialists: \"Life-sustainability-strategicity\", \"Metacognitive knowledge - control over action\" and \"Positive refocusing - Metacognitive activity\" are specified.","PeriodicalId":149585,"journal":{"name":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEUROPERSONALITY APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF COGNITIVE SECURITY AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR WORK-RELATED SOCIALIZATION OF IT-SPECIALISTS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.37096/shdisj-23-1.1-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The post-classical paradigm of understanding the system of personality potentials due to virtualization and informatization of most spheres of natural life emphasizes the need to rethink the many positions of determining personal development and resourcefulness of specialists. The conceptual principles of cognitive security research of specialists in the field of IT technologies, whose professional activity is directly related to information culture, information, and cognitive security of others, need to be clarified.\\nMethodology. An empirical study was conducted on two randomized groups of IT specialists. The groups are differentiated according to the criterion of professional experience. Accordingly, two groups were formed: EG1 (n 76) - IT specialists with experience of up to five years and group EG2 (n 83) - IT specialists with experience of more than five years (6-10 years). To generalize the structure of the relationship of categories that reveal the range of factors of cognitive-stylistic determination and neurodynamic conditionality of cognitive security of IT specialists, an expert evaluation was conducted. Research technology involved the assessment of IT experts (22 specialists with 15-22 years of experience) the importance of parameters that identified three main strategies for cognitive security of IT specialists\\nResults. Sixteen neuropersonality types of solving professional problems and ensuring cognitive security of IT specialists differentiated by professional experience were identified. Three strategies of cognitive security of IT specialists: \\\"Life-sustainability-strategicity\\\", \\\"Metacognitive knowledge - control over action\\\" and \\\"Positive refocusing - Metacognitive activity\\\" are specified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-23-1.1-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialization & Human Development: International Scientific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37096/shdisj-23-1.1-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于自然生活中大多数领域的虚拟化和信息化,后古典范式对人格潜能系统的理解强调需要重新思考决定专家个人发展和机智的多种定位。IT 技术领域专家的职业活动与信息文化、信息和他人的认知安全直接相关,因此需要明确对他们进行认知安全研究的概念原则。对两组随机抽取的信息技术专家进行了实证研究。根据专业经验的标准对小组进行了区分。因此形成了两个小组:EG1 组(76 人)--工作经验不超过五年的 IT 专家,EG2 组(83 人)--工作经验超过五年(6-10 年)的 IT 专家。为了概括揭示信息技术专家认知风格决定因素范围和认知安全神经动力条件的类别关系结构,进行了一次专家评估。研究技术包括对信息技术专家(22 名有 15-22 年工作经验的专家)的参数重要性进行评估,这些参数确定了信息技术专家认知安全的三种主要策略。根据专业经验的不同,确定了 16 种解决专业问题和确保 IT 专家认知安全的神经人格类型。信息技术专家认知安全的三种策略:具体包括:"生活-可持续性-战略"、"元认知知识-行动控制 "和 "积极重新聚焦-元认知活动"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NEUROPERSONALITY APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF COGNITIVE SECURITY AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR WORK-RELATED SOCIALIZATION OF IT-SPECIALISTS
The post-classical paradigm of understanding the system of personality potentials due to virtualization and informatization of most spheres of natural life emphasizes the need to rethink the many positions of determining personal development and resourcefulness of specialists. The conceptual principles of cognitive security research of specialists in the field of IT technologies, whose professional activity is directly related to information culture, information, and cognitive security of others, need to be clarified. Methodology. An empirical study was conducted on two randomized groups of IT specialists. The groups are differentiated according to the criterion of professional experience. Accordingly, two groups were formed: EG1 (n 76) - IT specialists with experience of up to five years and group EG2 (n 83) - IT specialists with experience of more than five years (6-10 years). To generalize the structure of the relationship of categories that reveal the range of factors of cognitive-stylistic determination and neurodynamic conditionality of cognitive security of IT specialists, an expert evaluation was conducted. Research technology involved the assessment of IT experts (22 specialists with 15-22 years of experience) the importance of parameters that identified three main strategies for cognitive security of IT specialists Results. Sixteen neuropersonality types of solving professional problems and ensuring cognitive security of IT specialists differentiated by professional experience were identified. Three strategies of cognitive security of IT specialists: "Life-sustainability-strategicity", "Metacognitive knowledge - control over action" and "Positive refocusing - Metacognitive activity" are specified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信