分析大型翻转工程学课程中学生的学习路径

C. Reidsema, Hassan Khosravi, M. Fleming, L. Kavanagh, Nichoas Achilles, Esther Fink
{"title":"分析大型翻转工程学课程中学生的学习路径","authors":"C. Reidsema, Hassan Khosravi, M. Fleming, L. Kavanagh, Nichoas Achilles, Esther Fink","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2017.775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advancements in educational technologies (learning management systems, online discussion forums, peer-learning tools) coupled with new methods of course delivery (e.g. blended, flipped, MOOCs) provide significant opportunities for universities to deliver challenging, high quality, yet engaging curriculum for students. In this paper, we examine the variations and similarities of student’s approaches to learning (learning pathways) by examining how well they performed in a large (N ~ 1000 student) first year engineering flipped classroom. The analysis focused on student’s performance in their assessment (formative and summative) as well as their online interaction with a range of tools purposely built to support students through peer learning and acquisition of resources and expertise. Analysis using k-means clustering reveals that students do in fact adopt a variety of successful pathways through the course. The unique aspects of this work lie in the use of analytics algorithms that whilst perhaps routinely utilised in data mining, are not as well utilised in better understanding patterns (successful or otherwise) of student interactions within a technology enhanced active learning environment that integrates theory with engineering practice.","PeriodicalId":475867,"journal":{"name":"ASCILITE Publications","volume":"118 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the learning pathways of students in a large flipped engineering course\",\"authors\":\"C. Reidsema, Hassan Khosravi, M. Fleming, L. Kavanagh, Nichoas Achilles, Esther Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/apubs.2017.775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent advancements in educational technologies (learning management systems, online discussion forums, peer-learning tools) coupled with new methods of course delivery (e.g. blended, flipped, MOOCs) provide significant opportunities for universities to deliver challenging, high quality, yet engaging curriculum for students. In this paper, we examine the variations and similarities of student’s approaches to learning (learning pathways) by examining how well they performed in a large (N ~ 1000 student) first year engineering flipped classroom. The analysis focused on student’s performance in their assessment (formative and summative) as well as their online interaction with a range of tools purposely built to support students through peer learning and acquisition of resources and expertise. Analysis using k-means clustering reveals that students do in fact adopt a variety of successful pathways through the course. The unique aspects of this work lie in the use of analytics algorithms that whilst perhaps routinely utilised in data mining, are not as well utilised in better understanding patterns (successful or otherwise) of student interactions within a technology enhanced active learning environment that integrates theory with engineering practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":475867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"volume\":\"118 42\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASCILITE Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCILITE Publications","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

教育技术(学习管理系统、在线讨论论坛、同伴学习工具)的最新进展与新的课程讲授方法(如混合式、翻转式、MOOCs)相结合,为大学向学生提供具有挑战性、高质量且引人入胜的课程提供了重要机遇。在本文中,我们通过研究学生在大型(N ~ 1000 名学生)工程学一年级翻转课堂中的表现,考察了学生学习方法(学习路径)的异同。分析的重点是学生在评估(形成性评估和总结性评估)中的表现,以及他们与一系列工具的在线互动,这些工具的目的是通过同伴学习和获取资源及专业知识来支持学生。使用 k-means 聚类方法进行的分析表明,学生在课程中确实采取了多种成功途径。这项工作的独特之处在于使用了分析算法,虽然这些算法在数据挖掘中可能经常使用,但在更好地理解学生在理论与工程实践相结合的技术增强型主动学习环境中的互动模式(成功与否)方面却没有得到很好的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing the learning pathways of students in a large flipped engineering course
Recent advancements in educational technologies (learning management systems, online discussion forums, peer-learning tools) coupled with new methods of course delivery (e.g. blended, flipped, MOOCs) provide significant opportunities for universities to deliver challenging, high quality, yet engaging curriculum for students. In this paper, we examine the variations and similarities of student’s approaches to learning (learning pathways) by examining how well they performed in a large (N ~ 1000 student) first year engineering flipped classroom. The analysis focused on student’s performance in their assessment (formative and summative) as well as their online interaction with a range of tools purposely built to support students through peer learning and acquisition of resources and expertise. Analysis using k-means clustering reveals that students do in fact adopt a variety of successful pathways through the course. The unique aspects of this work lie in the use of analytics algorithms that whilst perhaps routinely utilised in data mining, are not as well utilised in better understanding patterns (successful or otherwise) of student interactions within a technology enhanced active learning environment that integrates theory with engineering practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信