贝宁北部玉米耕作制度中的资源禀赋和可持续土壤肥力管理战略

P. G. Tovihoudji, E. Sossa, Janvier Egah, E. C. Agbangba, P. Akponikpè, J. Yabi
{"title":"贝宁北部玉米耕作制度中的资源禀赋和可持续土壤肥力管理战略","authors":"P. G. Tovihoudji, E. Sossa, Janvier Egah, E. C. Agbangba, P. Akponikpè, J. Yabi","doi":"10.3389/fsrma.2024.1354981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing soil fertility remains one of the major concerns of smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In order to understand the adoption potential of recommended practices to smallholders, this study aimed to characterize the resource availability, allocation and use patterns, and the soil fertility management practices in the maize farming system in northern Benin.A survey was conducted with 262 households randomly selected across three municipalities from three agro-ecological zones. Focus groups discussions and individual interviews were conducted with the household heads using an interview guide and a structured questionnaire respectively. The main data collected included (a) the socio-economic characteristics of households, (b) the main farm type and their characteristics and (c) the current soil fertility management strategies and the rationale behind.The main soil fertility practices included the use of mineral fertilizer, manure, and crop residues application to plots. As a general trend, the rates of fertilizers applied by farmers [on average 132 ± 8.5 and 59 ± 5.8 kg ha−1 of Nitrogen-Phosphorus-Potassium (NPK) and urea] were below those recommended or required to ensure optimal maize yields. Five farm types corresponding to different resource endowments or wealth classes were identified. The scarce resource farms owned by the majority of poorer farmers use only small amounts of manure and fertilizer in their fields. Qualitative analysis indicated that farms have different constraints and opportunities to adopt newly proposed soil fertility management recommendations.Extension services and decision makers must target specific interventions for appropriation and sustainability of technologies to resource mostly the smallholder farmers.","PeriodicalId":496724,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management","volume":"122 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource endowment and sustainable soil fertility management strategies in maize farming systems in northern Benin\",\"authors\":\"P. G. Tovihoudji, E. Sossa, Janvier Egah, E. C. Agbangba, P. Akponikpè, J. Yabi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsrma.2024.1354981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Managing soil fertility remains one of the major concerns of smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In order to understand the adoption potential of recommended practices to smallholders, this study aimed to characterize the resource availability, allocation and use patterns, and the soil fertility management practices in the maize farming system in northern Benin.A survey was conducted with 262 households randomly selected across three municipalities from three agro-ecological zones. Focus groups discussions and individual interviews were conducted with the household heads using an interview guide and a structured questionnaire respectively. The main data collected included (a) the socio-economic characteristics of households, (b) the main farm type and their characteristics and (c) the current soil fertility management strategies and the rationale behind.The main soil fertility practices included the use of mineral fertilizer, manure, and crop residues application to plots. As a general trend, the rates of fertilizers applied by farmers [on average 132 ± 8.5 and 59 ± 5.8 kg ha−1 of Nitrogen-Phosphorus-Potassium (NPK) and urea] were below those recommended or required to ensure optimal maize yields. Five farm types corresponding to different resource endowments or wealth classes were identified. The scarce resource farms owned by the majority of poorer farmers use only small amounts of manure and fertilizer in their fields. Qualitative analysis indicated that farms have different constraints and opportunities to adopt newly proposed soil fertility management recommendations.Extension services and decision makers must target specific interventions for appropriation and sustainability of technologies to resource mostly the smallholder farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management\",\"volume\":\"122 31\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsrma.2024.1354981\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsrma.2024.1354981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤肥力管理仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)小农关注的主要问题之一。为了了解小农采用推荐做法的潜力,本研究旨在描述贝宁北部玉米耕作系统的资源可用性、分配和使用模式,以及土壤肥力管理做法。分别使用访谈指南和结构化问卷对户主进行了焦点小组讨论和个别访谈。收集的主要数据包括:(a) 家庭的社会经济特征;(b) 主要农场类型及其特征;(c) 当前的土壤肥力管理策略及其理由。从总体趋势来看,农民的施肥量[氮磷钾(NPK)和尿素的平均施肥量分别为 132 ± 8.5 千克/公顷和 59 ± 5.8 千克/公顷]低于确保玉米最佳产量所建议或要求的施肥量。根据不同的资源禀赋或财富等级,确定了五种农场类型。大多数贫困农民拥有的稀缺资源农场仅在田间施用少量粪肥和化肥。定性分析表明,农场在采用新提出的土壤肥力管理建议方面存在不同的限制因素和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resource endowment and sustainable soil fertility management strategies in maize farming systems in northern Benin
Managing soil fertility remains one of the major concerns of smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In order to understand the adoption potential of recommended practices to smallholders, this study aimed to characterize the resource availability, allocation and use patterns, and the soil fertility management practices in the maize farming system in northern Benin.A survey was conducted with 262 households randomly selected across three municipalities from three agro-ecological zones. Focus groups discussions and individual interviews were conducted with the household heads using an interview guide and a structured questionnaire respectively. The main data collected included (a) the socio-economic characteristics of households, (b) the main farm type and their characteristics and (c) the current soil fertility management strategies and the rationale behind.The main soil fertility practices included the use of mineral fertilizer, manure, and crop residues application to plots. As a general trend, the rates of fertilizers applied by farmers [on average 132 ± 8.5 and 59 ± 5.8 kg ha−1 of Nitrogen-Phosphorus-Potassium (NPK) and urea] were below those recommended or required to ensure optimal maize yields. Five farm types corresponding to different resource endowments or wealth classes were identified. The scarce resource farms owned by the majority of poorer farmers use only small amounts of manure and fertilizer in their fields. Qualitative analysis indicated that farms have different constraints and opportunities to adopt newly proposed soil fertility management recommendations.Extension services and decision makers must target specific interventions for appropriation and sustainability of technologies to resource mostly the smallholder farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信