中期对话是公平和包容性形成性评估的共同创造者

Alice Lesnick, Sabea K. Evans, Margo Schall, Alison Cook-Sather
{"title":"中期对话是公平和包容性形成性评估的共同创造者","authors":"Alice Lesnick, Sabea K. Evans, Margo Schall, Alison Cook-Sather","doi":"10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although assessment of student learning remains a thorny area for co-creation in education, a growing number of researchers and practitioners advocate and enact partnership in formative and summative assessment as part of equity work. In this case study, we join these efforts in reflecting on students’ and our own experiences of the midterm conversation that we use as a key formative assessment structure and process across three co-facilitated courses. The midterm conversation—a partnership among students and instructors as co-teachers—is embedded in course design and curriculum with the goal of advancing, informing, and sustaining our pedagogical commitments. This case illustrates how we practice assessment as dialogue and as emergent understanding. This practice is based on an expectation of diverse learning goals and outcomes and on trust in students’ capacities to direct their learning with reference to their own interests and standards for their work.","PeriodicalId":321479,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Students as Partners","volume":"79 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm conversations as co-creation of equitable and inclusive formative assessment\",\"authors\":\"Alice Lesnick, Sabea K. Evans, Margo Schall, Alison Cook-Sather\",\"doi\":\"10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although assessment of student learning remains a thorny area for co-creation in education, a growing number of researchers and practitioners advocate and enact partnership in formative and summative assessment as part of equity work. In this case study, we join these efforts in reflecting on students’ and our own experiences of the midterm conversation that we use as a key formative assessment structure and process across three co-facilitated courses. The midterm conversation—a partnership among students and instructors as co-teachers—is embedded in course design and curriculum with the goal of advancing, informing, and sustaining our pedagogical commitments. This case illustrates how we practice assessment as dialogue and as emergent understanding. This practice is based on an expectation of diverse learning goals and outcomes and on trust in students’ capacities to direct their learning with reference to their own interests and standards for their work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Students as Partners\",\"volume\":\"79 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Students as Partners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Students as Partners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对学生学习的评估仍然是教育中共同创造的一个棘手领域,但越来越多的研究者和实践者倡导并在形成性和终结性评估中建立伙伴关系,将其作为公平工作的一部分。在本案例研究中,我们加入了这些努力,反思了学生和我们自己在期中谈话中的经验,我们将期中谈话作为三门共同授课课程的关键形成性评价结构和过程。期中谈话--学生和教师之间的合作,作为共同教师--被嵌入课程设计和课程中,目的是推进、指导和维持我们的教学承诺。这个案例说明了我们是如何将评价作为对话和新的理解来实践的。这种实践的基础是对不同学习目标和结果的期望,以及对学生能力的信任,学生可以根据自己的兴趣和作业标准指导自己的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Midterm conversations as co-creation of equitable and inclusive formative assessment
Although assessment of student learning remains a thorny area for co-creation in education, a growing number of researchers and practitioners advocate and enact partnership in formative and summative assessment as part of equity work. In this case study, we join these efforts in reflecting on students’ and our own experiences of the midterm conversation that we use as a key formative assessment structure and process across three co-facilitated courses. The midterm conversation—a partnership among students and instructors as co-teachers—is embedded in course design and curriculum with the goal of advancing, informing, and sustaining our pedagogical commitments. This case illustrates how we practice assessment as dialogue and as emergent understanding. This practice is based on an expectation of diverse learning goals and outcomes and on trust in students’ capacities to direct their learning with reference to their own interests and standards for their work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信