Cynthia A. Verloop, Lieke Hol, Marco J. Bruno, L. V. van Driel, Arjun Dave Koch
{"title":"上消化道上皮下病变的内窥镜切除术;荷兰一家三级转诊医院的经验。","authors":"Cynthia A. Verloop, Lieke Hol, Marco J. Bruno, L. V. van Driel, Arjun Dave Koch","doi":"10.1055/a-2325-3747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nHistological confirmation of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract remains challenging. Endoscopic resection of SELs is increasingly used for its excellent diagnostic yield and opportunity to do away with continued surveillance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the indications, success-rates and complications of different endoscopic resections techniques for SELs in a large, tertiary referral hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.\nMethods\nData between October 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Main outcomes are R0-resection rate, en bloc resection rate, recurrence rate and procedure-related adverse events (Clavien-Dindo). Secondary outcomes are procedure time, need for surgical intervention and clinical impact on patient management. \nResults\nA total of 58 patients were referred for endoscopic resection of upper gastro-intestinal SELs. The median diameter of lesions was 20 mm (range 7-100mm). Median follow-up time was 5 months (range 0.4-75.7). Forty-eight (83%) procedures were completed successfully leading to en bloc resection in 85% and R0-resection in 63%. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 6 patients (13%). Severe complications (CD grade 3a) were seen in 3 patients. Local recurrence rate for (pre)malignant diagnosis was 2%. Additional surgical intervention was needed in 7 patients (15%). A total of 32 patients (67%) could be discharged from further surveillance after endoscopic resection.\nConclusions\nEndoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for SELs and offers valuable information in undetermined SELs in which repeated sampling attempts have failed to provide adequate tissue for diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":508938,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"89 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic resection in subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract; experience of a tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia A. Verloop, Lieke Hol, Marco J. Bruno, L. V. van Driel, Arjun Dave Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2325-3747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives\\nHistological confirmation of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract remains challenging. Endoscopic resection of SELs is increasingly used for its excellent diagnostic yield and opportunity to do away with continued surveillance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the indications, success-rates and complications of different endoscopic resections techniques for SELs in a large, tertiary referral hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.\\nMethods\\nData between October 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Main outcomes are R0-resection rate, en bloc resection rate, recurrence rate and procedure-related adverse events (Clavien-Dindo). Secondary outcomes are procedure time, need for surgical intervention and clinical impact on patient management. \\nResults\\nA total of 58 patients were referred for endoscopic resection of upper gastro-intestinal SELs. The median diameter of lesions was 20 mm (range 7-100mm). Median follow-up time was 5 months (range 0.4-75.7). Forty-eight (83%) procedures were completed successfully leading to en bloc resection in 85% and R0-resection in 63%. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 6 patients (13%). Severe complications (CD grade 3a) were seen in 3 patients. Local recurrence rate for (pre)malignant diagnosis was 2%. Additional surgical intervention was needed in 7 patients (15%). A total of 32 patients (67%) could be discharged from further surveillance after endoscopic resection.\\nConclusions\\nEndoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for SELs and offers valuable information in undetermined SELs in which repeated sampling attempts have failed to provide adequate tissue for diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"89 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2325-3747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2325-3747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的上消化道上皮下病变(SEL)的组织学确诊仍具有挑战性。内镜下上皮下病变切除术因其出色的诊断率和无需持续观察的机会而被越来越多地采用。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估荷兰鹿特丹一家大型三级转诊医院中不同内镜切除技术治疗 SEL 的适应症、成功率和并发症。主要结果包括R0切除率、全切除率、复发率和手术相关不良事件(Clavien-Dindo)。次要结果包括手术时间、手术干预需求和对患者管理的临床影响。结果共有58名患者转诊接受了上消化道SEL内镜切除术。病变的中位直径为20毫米(范围7-100毫米)。中位随访时间为 5 个月(0.4-75.7 个月)。48例(83%)手术成功完成,其中85%进行了全切,63%进行了R0切除。6名患者(13%)发生了与手术相关的不良事件。3名患者出现严重并发症(CD 3a级)。恶性前诊断的局部复发率为2%。7名患者(15%)需要进行额外的手术治疗。结论:内窥镜切除术是一种安全有效的 SEL 治疗方法,对于多次取样均无法提供足够组织进行诊断的未确定 SEL,它能提供有价值的信息。
Endoscopic resection in subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract; experience of a tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands.
Objectives
Histological confirmation of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract remains challenging. Endoscopic resection of SELs is increasingly used for its excellent diagnostic yield and opportunity to do away with continued surveillance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the indications, success-rates and complications of different endoscopic resections techniques for SELs in a large, tertiary referral hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Methods
Data between October 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Main outcomes are R0-resection rate, en bloc resection rate, recurrence rate and procedure-related adverse events (Clavien-Dindo). Secondary outcomes are procedure time, need for surgical intervention and clinical impact on patient management.
Results
A total of 58 patients were referred for endoscopic resection of upper gastro-intestinal SELs. The median diameter of lesions was 20 mm (range 7-100mm). Median follow-up time was 5 months (range 0.4-75.7). Forty-eight (83%) procedures were completed successfully leading to en bloc resection in 85% and R0-resection in 63%. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 6 patients (13%). Severe complications (CD grade 3a) were seen in 3 patients. Local recurrence rate for (pre)malignant diagnosis was 2%. Additional surgical intervention was needed in 7 patients (15%). A total of 32 patients (67%) could be discharged from further surveillance after endoscopic resection.
Conclusions
Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for SELs and offers valuable information in undetermined SELs in which repeated sampling attempts have failed to provide adequate tissue for diagnosis.