不同畸形的气道分析 - 一项头颅测量研究

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
R.Hellweg Sheraffin, Mary Sheloni Missier, S.D.Milling Tania, I.Bevin Shaga, S.Veerasankar, A. Jebilla Pringle
{"title":"不同畸形的气道分析 - 一项头颅测量研究","authors":"R.Hellweg Sheraffin, Mary Sheloni Missier, S.D.Milling Tania, I.Bevin Shaga, S.Veerasankar, A. Jebilla Pringle","doi":"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v15i1.1011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground: It was essential to evaluate respiratory function when diagnosing and planning orthodontic treatment. Based on the correlation between pharyngeal airway space and craniofacial structure, airway width was hypothesized to be an indicator of airway patency in different groups of skeletal malocclusion.\n\n\nAim: The purpose of this study was to investigate age and gender related changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal skeletal relationships\n\n\nMaterials and Method: Sixty lateral cephalograms of patients aged 10-30 years with no pharyngeal pathology or nasal obstruction were retrospectively selected and categorized into skeletal Class I (n = 20), Class II (n = 20), and Class III (n = 20) malocclusion based on ANB angle. McNamara's airway analysis was used to quantify upper- and lower-airway dimensions. The analyses of intergroup differences were performed using a one-way ANOVA, an independent t-test, and Tukey's test as a post-hoc test.\n\n\nResults: Participants in the study ranged in age from 20.57 ± 5.41 years (males) and 20.03 ± 4.58 years (females) were included in the study. The upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) dimensions demonstrated a positive correlation with age. In both genders, the mean upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) size exceeded the lower pharyngeal airway (LPA) size, but neither age nor gender was associated with statistically significant differences in skeletal malocclusion.\n\n\nConclusion: It was shown that skeletal malocclusions of different types have no effect on the upper and lower pharyngeal airways and that the upper and lower pharyngeal airways are not influenced by age or gender.\n","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Analysis in Different Malocclusions - A Cephalometric Study\",\"authors\":\"R.Hellweg Sheraffin, Mary Sheloni Missier, S.D.Milling Tania, I.Bevin Shaga, S.Veerasankar, A. Jebilla Pringle\",\"doi\":\"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v15i1.1011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nBackground: It was essential to evaluate respiratory function when diagnosing and planning orthodontic treatment. Based on the correlation between pharyngeal airway space and craniofacial structure, airway width was hypothesized to be an indicator of airway patency in different groups of skeletal malocclusion.\\n\\n\\nAim: The purpose of this study was to investigate age and gender related changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal skeletal relationships\\n\\n\\nMaterials and Method: Sixty lateral cephalograms of patients aged 10-30 years with no pharyngeal pathology or nasal obstruction were retrospectively selected and categorized into skeletal Class I (n = 20), Class II (n = 20), and Class III (n = 20) malocclusion based on ANB angle. McNamara's airway analysis was used to quantify upper- and lower-airway dimensions. The analyses of intergroup differences were performed using a one-way ANOVA, an independent t-test, and Tukey's test as a post-hoc test.\\n\\n\\nResults: Participants in the study ranged in age from 20.57 ± 5.41 years (males) and 20.03 ± 4.58 years (females) were included in the study. The upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) dimensions demonstrated a positive correlation with age. In both genders, the mean upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) size exceeded the lower pharyngeal airway (LPA) size, but neither age nor gender was associated with statistically significant differences in skeletal malocclusion.\\n\\n\\nConclusion: It was shown that skeletal malocclusions of different types have no effect on the upper and lower pharyngeal airways and that the upper and lower pharyngeal airways are not influenced by age or gender.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":29888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v15i1.1011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v15i1.1011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在诊断和计划正畸治疗时,评估呼吸功能至关重要。根据咽部气道空间与颅面结构之间的相关性,推测气道宽度是不同骨骼错颌畸形组气道通畅性的指标:回顾性选取 60 例 10-30 岁无咽部病变或鼻阻塞的患者的头颅侧位片,根据 ANB 角将其分为骨骼Ⅰ类(20 例)、Ⅱ类(20 例)和Ⅲ类(20 例)错颌畸形。采用麦克纳马拉气道分析法量化上下气道尺寸。组间差异分析采用单因素方差分析、独立t检验和Tukey's检验作为事后检验:研究对象的年龄为(20.57±5.41)岁(男性)和(20.03±4.58)岁(女性)。咽上气道(UPA)尺寸与年龄呈正相关。在两种性别中,上咽气道(UPA)的平均尺寸都超过了下咽气道(LPA)的尺寸,但年龄和性别都与骨骼错合畸形的统计学差异无关:结论:研究表明,不同类型的骨骼错颌对上下咽气道没有影响,上下咽气道不受年龄和性别的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Analysis in Different Malocclusions - A Cephalometric Study
Background: It was essential to evaluate respiratory function when diagnosing and planning orthodontic treatment. Based on the correlation between pharyngeal airway space and craniofacial structure, airway width was hypothesized to be an indicator of airway patency in different groups of skeletal malocclusion. Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate age and gender related changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal skeletal relationships Materials and Method: Sixty lateral cephalograms of patients aged 10-30 years with no pharyngeal pathology or nasal obstruction were retrospectively selected and categorized into skeletal Class I (n = 20), Class II (n = 20), and Class III (n = 20) malocclusion based on ANB angle. McNamara's airway analysis was used to quantify upper- and lower-airway dimensions. The analyses of intergroup differences were performed using a one-way ANOVA, an independent t-test, and Tukey's test as a post-hoc test. Results: Participants in the study ranged in age from 20.57 ± 5.41 years (males) and 20.03 ± 4.58 years (females) were included in the study. The upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) dimensions demonstrated a positive correlation with age. In both genders, the mean upper pharyngeal airway (UPA) size exceeded the lower pharyngeal airway (LPA) size, but neither age nor gender was associated with statistically significant differences in skeletal malocclusion. Conclusion: It was shown that skeletal malocclusions of different types have no effect on the upper and lower pharyngeal airways and that the upper and lower pharyngeal airways are not influenced by age or gender.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信