文章处理费压制了博士生的学术研究

Q2 Social Sciences

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.3897/ese.2024.e124173

Joshua Wang

{"title":"文章处理费压制了博士生的学术研究","authors":"Joshua Wang","doi":"10.3897/ese.2024.e124173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The open access movement has drastically reconfigured the financial burdens of scholarly publishing. Yet, the influence of a marketized scholarly publishing system on doctoral education remains unexplored. I reflect on my own PhD candidature to illustrate how article processing charges disempower doctoral candidates. I argue that the current open access publishing model unfairly advantages candidates with personal, familial and/or institutional wealth. The inequalities imposed on doctoral students by our sectors’ current publishing habits ultimately bias who will be paid to produce and safeguard knowledge in the future. Doctoral students can no longer be ignored in debates over open access publishing.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":"92 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article processing charges suppress the scholarship of doctoral students\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/ese.2024.e124173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The open access movement has drastically reconfigured the financial burdens of scholarly publishing. Yet, the influence of a marketized scholarly publishing system on doctoral education remains unexplored. I reflect on my own PhD candidature to illustrate how article processing charges disempower doctoral candidates. I argue that the current open access publishing model unfairly advantages candidates with personal, familial and/or institutional wealth. The inequalities imposed on doctoral students by our sectors’ current publishing habits ultimately bias who will be paid to produce and safeguard knowledge in the future. Doctoral students can no longer be ignored in debates over open access publishing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Science Editing\",\"volume\":\"92 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Science Editing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e124173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Science Editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2024.e124173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

开放存取运动极大地重构了学术出版的经济负担。然而，市场化的学术出版系统对博士教育的影响仍未得到探讨。我以自己的博士候选人经历为例，说明文章处理费如何剥夺了博士候选人的权力。我认为，当前的开放存取出版模式不公平地有利于拥有个人、家庭和/或机构财富的候选人。我们各行各业目前的出版习惯给博士生带来的不平等最终会影响到未来谁将有偿生产和保护知识。在有关开放存取出版的辩论中，博士生再也不能被忽视了。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Article processing charges suppress the scholarship of doctoral students

The open access movement has drastically reconfigured the financial burdens of scholarly publishing. Yet, the influence of a marketized scholarly publishing system on doctoral education remains unexplored. I reflect on my own PhD candidature to illustrate how article processing charges disempower doctoral candidates. I argue that the current open access publishing model unfairly advantages candidates with personal, familial and/or institutional wealth. The inequalities imposed on doctoral students by our sectors’ current publishing habits ultimately bias who will be paid to produce and safeguard knowledge in the future. Doctoral students can no longer be ignored in debates over open access publishing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Science Editing Social Sciences-Communication

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： EASE"s journal, European Science Editing , publishes articles, reports meetings, announces new developments and forthcoming events, reviews books, software and online resources, and highlights publications of interest to members.