发展中国家慢性髓性白血病分子监测标准化面临的技术挑战

Ines Ouahchi
{"title":"发展中国家慢性髓性白血病分子监测标准化面临的技术挑战","authors":"Ines Ouahchi","doi":"10.4038/josuk.v17i1.8106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantification of BCR-ABL after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an important therapeutic indicator for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). An international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL was established in 2012 to improve the comparability of results between different laboratories. BCR-ABL measurement is technically challenging, especially in developing countries where the process of standardization isn’t easily available. The aim of this study was to assess the technical advantages of reporting results on the IS using the GeneXpert BCR-ABL assay, compared to the RQ-PCR standard method currently recommended by the European Leukaemia Network but not standardised in our laboratory and to compare the results obtained by both methods. BCR-ABL transcript quantification was performed in 51 samples from CML patients by both methods. The operator hands-on time was reduced using the automated method. A good linear correlation was observed in the results between the two methods. The concordance at logarithmic intervals reached 64%. When the major molecular response (MMR) and the early molecular response (EMR) were analysed, 90% and 80% agreement, respectively, were achieved. However, the discordances in the remaining cases could have misled the therapeutic approach if only a standard method was used. The complexity of the process to establish a laboratory-specific conversion factor in developing countries can be overcome by the use of the GeneXpert automated system, which represents a rapid, accurate and reliable clinical tool to correctly define molecular responses on the IS and to allow clinicians to achieve better patient management.","PeriodicalId":437187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science of the University of Kelaniya","volume":"120 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical challenges for standardization of molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukaemia in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"Ines Ouahchi\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/josuk.v17i1.8106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantification of BCR-ABL after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an important therapeutic indicator for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). An international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL was established in 2012 to improve the comparability of results between different laboratories. BCR-ABL measurement is technically challenging, especially in developing countries where the process of standardization isn’t easily available. The aim of this study was to assess the technical advantages of reporting results on the IS using the GeneXpert BCR-ABL assay, compared to the RQ-PCR standard method currently recommended by the European Leukaemia Network but not standardised in our laboratory and to compare the results obtained by both methods. BCR-ABL transcript quantification was performed in 51 samples from CML patients by both methods. The operator hands-on time was reduced using the automated method. A good linear correlation was observed in the results between the two methods. The concordance at logarithmic intervals reached 64%. When the major molecular response (MMR) and the early molecular response (EMR) were analysed, 90% and 80% agreement, respectively, were achieved. However, the discordances in the remaining cases could have misled the therapeutic approach if only a standard method was used. The complexity of the process to establish a laboratory-specific conversion factor in developing countries can be overcome by the use of the GeneXpert automated system, which represents a rapid, accurate and reliable clinical tool to correctly define molecular responses on the IS and to allow clinicians to achieve better patient management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science of the University of Kelaniya\",\"volume\":\"120 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science of the University of Kelaniya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/josuk.v17i1.8106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science of the University of Kelaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/josuk.v17i1.8106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后的BCR-ABL定量是慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的一项重要治疗指标。2012年制定了BCR-ABL国际量表(IS),以提高不同实验室检测结果的可比性。BCR-ABL 测量在技术上具有挑战性,尤其是在发展中国家,标准化过程并不容易实现。本研究旨在评估使用GeneXpert BCR-ABL检测法在IS上报告结果的技术优势,与欧洲白血病网络目前推荐但我们实验室尚未标准化的RQ-PCR标准方法进行比较,并比较两种方法得出的结果。两种方法都对 51 份 CML 患者样本进行了 BCR-ABL 转录本定量分析。使用自动方法减少了操作员的动手时间。两种方法的结果呈良好的线性相关。对数间隔的一致性达到 64%。在分析主要分子反应(MMR)和早期分子反应(EMR)时,两者的一致性分别达到了 90% 和 80%。然而,如果只使用标准方法,其余病例的不一致可能会误导治疗方法。GeneXpert自动化系统是一种快速、准确、可靠的临床工具,可用于正确定义IS上的分子反应,使临床医生更好地管理病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical challenges for standardization of molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukaemia in developing countries
Quantification of BCR-ABL after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an important therapeutic indicator for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). An international scale (IS) for BCR-ABL was established in 2012 to improve the comparability of results between different laboratories. BCR-ABL measurement is technically challenging, especially in developing countries where the process of standardization isn’t easily available. The aim of this study was to assess the technical advantages of reporting results on the IS using the GeneXpert BCR-ABL assay, compared to the RQ-PCR standard method currently recommended by the European Leukaemia Network but not standardised in our laboratory and to compare the results obtained by both methods. BCR-ABL transcript quantification was performed in 51 samples from CML patients by both methods. The operator hands-on time was reduced using the automated method. A good linear correlation was observed in the results between the two methods. The concordance at logarithmic intervals reached 64%. When the major molecular response (MMR) and the early molecular response (EMR) were analysed, 90% and 80% agreement, respectively, were achieved. However, the discordances in the remaining cases could have misled the therapeutic approach if only a standard method was used. The complexity of the process to establish a laboratory-specific conversion factor in developing countries can be overcome by the use of the GeneXpert automated system, which represents a rapid, accurate and reliable clinical tool to correctly define molecular responses on the IS and to allow clinicians to achieve better patient management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信