通过大学实践对大学讲座评价叙事问卷进行情感分析和语义网络分析

Suna Oh, Eunchang Na, Jinyoung Kim
{"title":"通过大学实践对大学讲座评价叙事问卷进行情感分析和语义网络分析","authors":"Suna Oh, Eunchang Na, Jinyoung Kim","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The purpose of this study was to derive directions and implications for quality of education through sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis of university descriptive course evaluations. \nMethods The analysis data consisted of 243,900 descriptive lecture evaluations from the first semester of 2020 to the first semester of 2023 at University A. Emotion words were classified in the order of positive, negative, and neutral, and the frequency and ratio of descriptive lecture evaluation contents by year, subject, and college were calculated. N-gram and clustering were analyzed using Textome, and network centrality between keywords was analyzed and visualized using Ucinet 6. \nResults First, in the sentiment analysis trend for descriptive lecture evaluation questions by year, course com-pleted, and university, positive opinions were found to be dominant. Second, as a result of the keyword frequency and N-gram analysis of the lecture evaluation contents, the frequency of ‘class’ and ‘thank you’ was high in pos-itive evaluations, and the frequency of ‘class’, ‘assignment’, and ‘unsatisfactory’ was high in negative descriptive course evaluations. In addition, ‘class’ was expanded around the keywords ‘content’, ‘progress’, ‘time’, and ‘regrettable’. Third, the results of semantic network analysis between keywords in the lecture evaluation contents showed that in the positive type, ‘gratitude’, ‘class’, ‘hard work’, ‘explanation’, ‘student’, ‘kindness’, ‘help’, ‘understanding’, ‘assignment’, ‘time’ were the most important and connected keywords. In the negative course evaluation, keywords including ‘class’, ‘lecture’, ‘professor’, ‘assignment’, ‘disappointing’, ‘difficult’, ‘anxiety of test’ were analyzed as the most connected. \nConclusions This study showed the possibility of suggesting directions for education improvement through de-scriptive lecture evaluation using sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentiment Analysis and Semantic Network Analysis of University Lecture Evaluation Narrative Questionnaire through A University Practice\",\"authors\":\"Suna Oh, Eunchang Na, Jinyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives The purpose of this study was to derive directions and implications for quality of education through sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis of university descriptive course evaluations. \\nMethods The analysis data consisted of 243,900 descriptive lecture evaluations from the first semester of 2020 to the first semester of 2023 at University A. Emotion words were classified in the order of positive, negative, and neutral, and the frequency and ratio of descriptive lecture evaluation contents by year, subject, and college were calculated. N-gram and clustering were analyzed using Textome, and network centrality between keywords was analyzed and visualized using Ucinet 6. \\nResults First, in the sentiment analysis trend for descriptive lecture evaluation questions by year, course com-pleted, and university, positive opinions were found to be dominant. Second, as a result of the keyword frequency and N-gram analysis of the lecture evaluation contents, the frequency of ‘class’ and ‘thank you’ was high in pos-itive evaluations, and the frequency of ‘class’, ‘assignment’, and ‘unsatisfactory’ was high in negative descriptive course evaluations. In addition, ‘class’ was expanded around the keywords ‘content’, ‘progress’, ‘time’, and ‘regrettable’. Third, the results of semantic network analysis between keywords in the lecture evaluation contents showed that in the positive type, ‘gratitude’, ‘class’, ‘hard work’, ‘explanation’, ‘student’, ‘kindness’, ‘help’, ‘understanding’, ‘assignment’, ‘time’ were the most important and connected keywords. In the negative course evaluation, keywords including ‘class’, ‘lecture’, ‘professor’, ‘assignment’, ‘disappointing’, ‘difficult’, ‘anxiety of test’ were analyzed as the most connected. \\nConclusions This study showed the possibility of suggesting directions for education improvement through de-scriptive lecture evaluation using sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过对大学描述性课程评价的情感分析和语义网络分析,得出教育质量的方向和意义。方法 分析数据包括 A 大学 2020 年第一学期至 2023 年第一学期的 243900 份描述性课程评价,按照积极、消极、中性的顺序对情感词进行分类,计算描述性课程评价内容在不同年份、学科和学院中的频率和比例。使用 Textome 对 N-gram 和聚类进行分析,使用 Ucinet 6 对关键词之间的网络中心度进行分析和可视化。结果 首先,在描述性讲座评价问题的情感分析趋势中,按年份、所选课程和大学划分,正面意见占主导地位。其次,通过对授课评价内容的关键词词频和 N-gram 分析发现,"class "和 "thank you "在正面评价中出现的频率较高,而 "class"、"assignment "和 "unsatisfactory "在负面描述性课程评价中出现的频率较高。此外,"课堂 "围绕关键词 "内容"、"进度"、"时间 "和 "遗憾 "进行了扩展。第三,授课评价内容中关键词之间的语义网络分析结果显示,在正面类型的课程评价中,"感激"、"课堂"、"努力"、"解释"、"学生"、"善意"、"帮助"、"理解"、"作业"、"时间 "是最重要且关联度最高的关键词。在负面课程评价中,"课堂"、"讲座"、"教授"、"作业"、"失望"、"困难"、"考试焦虑 "等关键词被分析为关联度最高的关键词。结论 本研究表明,可以利用情感分析和语义网络分析,通过去描述性讲座评价为教育改进提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentiment Analysis and Semantic Network Analysis of University Lecture Evaluation Narrative Questionnaire through A University Practice
Objectives The purpose of this study was to derive directions and implications for quality of education through sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis of university descriptive course evaluations. Methods The analysis data consisted of 243,900 descriptive lecture evaluations from the first semester of 2020 to the first semester of 2023 at University A. Emotion words were classified in the order of positive, negative, and neutral, and the frequency and ratio of descriptive lecture evaluation contents by year, subject, and college were calculated. N-gram and clustering were analyzed using Textome, and network centrality between keywords was analyzed and visualized using Ucinet 6. Results First, in the sentiment analysis trend for descriptive lecture evaluation questions by year, course com-pleted, and university, positive opinions were found to be dominant. Second, as a result of the keyword frequency and N-gram analysis of the lecture evaluation contents, the frequency of ‘class’ and ‘thank you’ was high in pos-itive evaluations, and the frequency of ‘class’, ‘assignment’, and ‘unsatisfactory’ was high in negative descriptive course evaluations. In addition, ‘class’ was expanded around the keywords ‘content’, ‘progress’, ‘time’, and ‘regrettable’. Third, the results of semantic network analysis between keywords in the lecture evaluation contents showed that in the positive type, ‘gratitude’, ‘class’, ‘hard work’, ‘explanation’, ‘student’, ‘kindness’, ‘help’, ‘understanding’, ‘assignment’, ‘time’ were the most important and connected keywords. In the negative course evaluation, keywords including ‘class’, ‘lecture’, ‘professor’, ‘assignment’, ‘disappointing’, ‘difficult’, ‘anxiety of test’ were analyzed as the most connected. Conclusions This study showed the possibility of suggesting directions for education improvement through de-scriptive lecture evaluation using sentiment analysis and semantic network analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信