Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son
{"title":"圆柱形工程缺陷对橡胶 RDX 炸药起爆波形的影响和比较","authors":"Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son","doi":"10.1002/prep.202300292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.","PeriodicalId":508060,"journal":{"name":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence and comparison of cylindrical engineered defects on detonation waveshape in a rubberized RDX explosive\",\"authors\":\"Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prep.202300292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence and comparison of cylindrical engineered defects on detonation waveshape in a rubberized RDX explosive
Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.