圆柱形工程缺陷对橡胶 RDX 炸药起爆波形的影响和比较

Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son
{"title":"圆柱形工程缺陷对橡胶 RDX 炸药起爆波形的影响和比较","authors":"Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son","doi":"10.1002/prep.202300292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.","PeriodicalId":508060,"journal":{"name":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence and comparison of cylindrical engineered defects on detonation waveshape in a rubberized RDX explosive\",\"authors\":\"Joseph R. Lawrence, Gabriel A. Montoya, Austin D. Koeblitz, Steven F. Son\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prep.202300292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炸药内部的不均匀性会影响高能材料的敏感性和起爆波形。空隙对爆炸起爆的影响已有详细记载,但 0.1 毫米到 10 毫米之间的空隙对传播中的爆炸波的影响在很大程度上仍未得到研究。本文利用橡胶化 1,3,5- 三硝基-1,3,5-三嗪(RDX)炸药中的人造空隙,研究了单个圆柱形空隙对起爆波形和再起爆的影响。为研究空洞的影响,现场采用了两种条纹成像技术。第一种是背表面条纹成像,改变样品上空隙的位置,并使用条纹照相机在回切实验中捕捉下游破口处引爆波形的变化。该实验的结果表明,在较短的回切距离内,最初的喷流会产生影响,随着冲击波的传播,喷流会被波前未受影响的部分吸收。第二种方法是顶面条纹成像,用于研究起爆前沿的再起爆/顺流传播以及橡胶炸药的起爆速度。这些实验与 PBX 9501(一种基于 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocane (HMX)的炸药)加工空隙的类似实验结果进行了比较,以研究不同炸药的起爆波与 0.5 毫米空隙的相互作用。实验还与使用多维和多材料流体动力学代码进行的模拟进行了比较。这些结果表明了微小特征对起爆波形的影响,以及炸药特性如何在这种相互作用中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence and comparison of cylindrical engineered defects on detonation waveshape in a rubberized RDX explosive
Inhomogeneities within explosives affect the sensitivity and detonation waveshape of energetic materials. The influence of voids on explosive initiation has been well documented; however, the effects that voids between 0.1 mm and 10 mm have on a propagating detonation wave remains largely unexplored. The effect of single cylindrical voids on detonation waveshape and re‐initiation was examined here using manufactured voids in a rubberized 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane (RDX) explosive. Two streak imaging techniques were fielded to investigate void influence. For the first, back‐surface streak imaging, the location of the void on the samples was changed and the resulting change in detonation waveshape at the downstream breakout was captured using a streak camera in cut‐back experiments. The results from this experiment showed the effects of an initial jet form for short cut‐back distances and as shock propagation progressed, the jet formation was absorbed by the unaffected portions of the wave front. The second method, top‐surface streak imaging, was used to investigate the re‐initiation/downstream propagation of the detonation front and the detonation velocity of the rubberized explosive. These experiments were compared to similar experimental results from machined voids in PBX 9501, an 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane (HMX)‐based explosive, to investigate the interaction of a detonation wave with a 0.5 mm void for different explosives. The experiments were also compared to simulations using a multi‐dimensional and multi‐material hydrodynamic code. These results showed the influence that small features can have on detonation waveshaping and how explosive properties play a key role in that interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信