"用数字发动的战争":澳大利亚边境工业综合体的会计和异化积累

M. Scobie, Lila Laird
{"title":"\"用数字发动的战争\":澳大利亚边境工业综合体的会计和异化积累","authors":"M. Scobie, Lila Laird","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper explores the role of accounting and accountability techniques in contributing to Australia’s border industrial complex.Design/methodology/approachWe use the political thought of Behrouz Boochani to explore the role that accounting techniques play at the micro and macro level of his dialectic of alienation and freedom. Firstly, we explore the accounting and accountability techniques detailed in Boochani’s No Friend but the Mountain, which gives an account of his life in Manus Prison, and the accounting techniques he experienced. Secondly, we explore the discourse of alienation created within the annual reporting of the Australian Federal Government regarding the border industrial complex.FindingsWe argue that the border industrial complex requires the alienation of asylum seekers from their own humanity for capital accumulation, and that accounting and accountability techniques facilitate this form of alienation. These techniques include inventorying, logging and queuing at the micro level within Manus Prison. This alienates those trapped in the system from one another and themselves. Techniques also include annual reporting at a macro level which alienates those trapped in the system from the (White) “Australian Community”. However, these techniques are resisted at every point by assertions of freedom.Originality/valueWe illustrate the role of accounting in accumulation by alienation, where the unfreedom of incarcerated asylum seekers is a site of profit for vested interests. But also that this alienation is resisted at every point by refusals of alienation as assertions of freedom. Thus, this study contributes to the accounting literature by drawing from theories of alienation, and putting forward the dialectic of alienation and freedom articulated by Boochani and collaborators.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"54 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“A war waged with numbers”: Accounting and accumulation by alienation in Australia’s border industrial complex\",\"authors\":\"M. Scobie, Lila Laird\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper explores the role of accounting and accountability techniques in contributing to Australia’s border industrial complex.Design/methodology/approachWe use the political thought of Behrouz Boochani to explore the role that accounting techniques play at the micro and macro level of his dialectic of alienation and freedom. Firstly, we explore the accounting and accountability techniques detailed in Boochani’s No Friend but the Mountain, which gives an account of his life in Manus Prison, and the accounting techniques he experienced. Secondly, we explore the discourse of alienation created within the annual reporting of the Australian Federal Government regarding the border industrial complex.FindingsWe argue that the border industrial complex requires the alienation of asylum seekers from their own humanity for capital accumulation, and that accounting and accountability techniques facilitate this form of alienation. These techniques include inventorying, logging and queuing at the micro level within Manus Prison. This alienates those trapped in the system from one another and themselves. Techniques also include annual reporting at a macro level which alienates those trapped in the system from the (White) “Australian Community”. However, these techniques are resisted at every point by assertions of freedom.Originality/valueWe illustrate the role of accounting in accumulation by alienation, where the unfreedom of incarcerated asylum seekers is a site of profit for vested interests. But also that this alienation is resisted at every point by refusals of alienation as assertions of freedom. Thus, this study contributes to the accounting literature by drawing from theories of alienation, and putting forward the dialectic of alienation and freedom articulated by Boochani and collaborators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计/方法/途径我们利用贝赫鲁斯-布查尼的政治思想,探讨会计技术在其异化与自由辩证法的微观和宏观层面上所发挥的作用。首先,我们探讨了布查尼在《除了山没有朋友》一书中详述的会计和问责技术,该书描述了他在马努斯监狱的生活以及他所经历的会计技术。其次,我们探讨了澳大利亚联邦政府在有关边境工业综合体的年度报告中所创造的异化话语。研究结果我们认为,边境工业综合体要求将寻求庇护者从他们自身的人性中异化出来,以实现资本积累,而会计和问责技术则为这种形式的异化提供了便利。这些技术包括马努斯监狱微观层面的清点、记录和排队。这使得被困在这个系统中的人彼此疏远,也疏远了他们自己。这些技术还包括宏观层面的年度报告,这使得被困在监狱中的囚犯与(白人)"澳大利亚社会 "疏远。原创性/价值我们说明了会计在异化积累中的作用,即被监禁的寻求庇护者的不自由成为既得利益者获利的场所。但同时,这种异化在每一个环节上都受到拒绝异化作为自由主张的抵制。因此,本研究借鉴了异化理论,提出了布查尼及其合作者所阐述的异化与自由的辩证关系,为会计文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“A war waged with numbers”: Accounting and accumulation by alienation in Australia’s border industrial complex
PurposeThis paper explores the role of accounting and accountability techniques in contributing to Australia’s border industrial complex.Design/methodology/approachWe use the political thought of Behrouz Boochani to explore the role that accounting techniques play at the micro and macro level of his dialectic of alienation and freedom. Firstly, we explore the accounting and accountability techniques detailed in Boochani’s No Friend but the Mountain, which gives an account of his life in Manus Prison, and the accounting techniques he experienced. Secondly, we explore the discourse of alienation created within the annual reporting of the Australian Federal Government regarding the border industrial complex.FindingsWe argue that the border industrial complex requires the alienation of asylum seekers from their own humanity for capital accumulation, and that accounting and accountability techniques facilitate this form of alienation. These techniques include inventorying, logging and queuing at the micro level within Manus Prison. This alienates those trapped in the system from one another and themselves. Techniques also include annual reporting at a macro level which alienates those trapped in the system from the (White) “Australian Community”. However, these techniques are resisted at every point by assertions of freedom.Originality/valueWe illustrate the role of accounting in accumulation by alienation, where the unfreedom of incarcerated asylum seekers is a site of profit for vested interests. But also that this alienation is resisted at every point by refusals of alienation as assertions of freedom. Thus, this study contributes to the accounting literature by drawing from theories of alienation, and putting forward the dialectic of alienation and freedom articulated by Boochani and collaborators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信