改变抗血栓治疗方法对心房颤动和抗凝治疗后仍发生缺血性脑血管事件患者的影响

Ehab Harahsheh, Omer Elshaigi, Nour Alhayek, Skye A. Buckner, Jaxon K. Quillen, Cumara B. O’Carroll, Oana M. Dumitrascu
{"title":"改变抗血栓治疗方法对心房颤动和抗凝治疗后仍发生缺血性脑血管事件患者的影响","authors":"Ehab Harahsheh, Omer Elshaigi, Nour Alhayek, Skye A. Buckner, Jaxon K. Quillen, Cumara B. O’Carroll, Oana M. Dumitrascu","doi":"10.1177/19418744241254897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulants (AC). We aim to evaluate whether changing AC or adding antiplatelet therapy to anticoagulants (AP + AC) in patients with AF presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) despite AC, decreases the risk of recurrent AIS/TIA compared to patients continued on same AC regimen. Patients with AF on AC presenting with AIS or TIA at our center between 2011- 2021 were included. Data on Demographics, index event, antithrombotic therapy before and after index event, recurrent AIS/TIA, or major bleeding events (MBE) were extracted. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between AC unchange vs AC change, and AP + AC vs AC only groups. One hundred eighty-five patients were included (mean age 78.3 years; 62% males, median follow-up 9 months (IQR 1-34)). Seventeen patients (9%) had AC change, 100 (54%) received AP + AC, 39 (21%) had recurrent AIS/TIA, and 27 (15%) had MBE following index event. No difference was observed between AC unchange vs AC change and AP + AC vs AC only groups regarding recurrent AIS/TIA (HR 1.72 [.65-4.57], P = .27 and HR 1.02 [.53- 1.98], P = .95, respectively) or MBE (HR .85 [.19-3.67], P = .83 and HR 1.49 [.67-3.33)], P = .33, respectively). Fourteen vascular neurologists treated this cohort and 9(64%) implemented AC changes. In this single center retrospective study of 185 patients with AF and AIS/TIA despite AC, changing AC or adding AP agents did not decrease the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events.","PeriodicalId":509682,"journal":{"name":"The Neurohospitalist","volume":"58 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Changing Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events Despite Anticoagulation\",\"authors\":\"Ehab Harahsheh, Omer Elshaigi, Nour Alhayek, Skye A. Buckner, Jaxon K. Quillen, Cumara B. O’Carroll, Oana M. Dumitrascu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19418744241254897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulants (AC). We aim to evaluate whether changing AC or adding antiplatelet therapy to anticoagulants (AP + AC) in patients with AF presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) despite AC, decreases the risk of recurrent AIS/TIA compared to patients continued on same AC regimen. Patients with AF on AC presenting with AIS or TIA at our center between 2011- 2021 were included. Data on Demographics, index event, antithrombotic therapy before and after index event, recurrent AIS/TIA, or major bleeding events (MBE) were extracted. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between AC unchange vs AC change, and AP + AC vs AC only groups. One hundred eighty-five patients were included (mean age 78.3 years; 62% males, median follow-up 9 months (IQR 1-34)). Seventeen patients (9%) had AC change, 100 (54%) received AP + AC, 39 (21%) had recurrent AIS/TIA, and 27 (15%) had MBE following index event. No difference was observed between AC unchange vs AC change and AP + AC vs AC only groups regarding recurrent AIS/TIA (HR 1.72 [.65-4.57], P = .27 and HR 1.02 [.53- 1.98], P = .95, respectively) or MBE (HR .85 [.19-3.67], P = .83 and HR 1.49 [.67-3.33)], P = .33, respectively). Fourteen vascular neurologists treated this cohort and 9(64%) implemented AC changes. In this single center retrospective study of 185 patients with AF and AIS/TIA despite AC, changing AC or adding AP agents did not decrease the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Neurohospitalist\",\"volume\":\"58 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Neurohospitalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241254897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241254897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管服用了抗凝剂(AC),心房颤动(AF)患者发生缺血性脑血管事件的风险仍在增加。我们旨在评估,与继续使用相同抗凝药物方案的患者相比,在使用抗凝药物的房颤患者出现急性缺血性卒中(AIS)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)时,更换抗凝药物或在使用抗凝药物的同时增加抗血小板治疗(AP + AC)是否会降低复发 AIS/TIA 的风险。本研究纳入了2011-2021年间在本中心接受房颤治疗并出现AIS或TIA的患者。提取的数据包括人口统计学、指数事件、指数事件前后的抗血栓治疗、复发性 AIS/TIA 或大出血事件 (MBE)。采用 Cox 比例危险模型比较 AC 不变组与 AC 变更组、AP + AC 组与仅 AC 组之间的结果。共纳入 185 名患者(平均年龄 78.3 岁;62% 为男性,中位随访 9 个月(IQR 1-34))。17 名患者(9%)更换了 AC,100 名患者(54%)接受了 AP + AC,39 名患者(21%)复发了 AIS/TIA,27 名患者(15%)在指数事件后出现了 MBE。在复发性 AIS/TIA 方面,AC 未改变组与 AC 改变组和 AP + AC 组与仅 AC 组之间未观察到差异(分别为 HR 1.72 [.65-4.57],P = .27 和 HR 1.02 [.53-1.98],P = .95)或 MBE(分别为 HR .85 [.19-3.67],P = .83 和 HR 1.49 [.67-3.33)],P = .33)。14 位血管神经科医生对该组患者进行了治疗,其中 9 位(64%)实施了 AC 改变。在这项针对 185 名房颤和 AIS/TIA 患者的单中心回顾性研究中,尽管使用了 AC,但更换 AC 或添加 AP 药物并未降低缺血性脑血管事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Changing Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events Despite Anticoagulation
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events despite anticoagulants (AC). We aim to evaluate whether changing AC or adding antiplatelet therapy to anticoagulants (AP + AC) in patients with AF presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) despite AC, decreases the risk of recurrent AIS/TIA compared to patients continued on same AC regimen. Patients with AF on AC presenting with AIS or TIA at our center between 2011- 2021 were included. Data on Demographics, index event, antithrombotic therapy before and after index event, recurrent AIS/TIA, or major bleeding events (MBE) were extracted. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between AC unchange vs AC change, and AP + AC vs AC only groups. One hundred eighty-five patients were included (mean age 78.3 years; 62% males, median follow-up 9 months (IQR 1-34)). Seventeen patients (9%) had AC change, 100 (54%) received AP + AC, 39 (21%) had recurrent AIS/TIA, and 27 (15%) had MBE following index event. No difference was observed between AC unchange vs AC change and AP + AC vs AC only groups regarding recurrent AIS/TIA (HR 1.72 [.65-4.57], P = .27 and HR 1.02 [.53- 1.98], P = .95, respectively) or MBE (HR .85 [.19-3.67], P = .83 and HR 1.49 [.67-3.33)], P = .33, respectively). Fourteen vascular neurologists treated this cohort and 9(64%) implemented AC changes. In this single center retrospective study of 185 patients with AF and AIS/TIA despite AC, changing AC or adding AP agents did not decrease the risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信