可持续退休取款的最佳取款频率

Stephen M. Horan
{"title":"可持续退休取款的最佳取款频率","authors":"Stephen M. Horan","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.1183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers have studied factors that influence the sustainability of retirement withdrawals (e.g., withdrawal rate, withdrawal rules, volatility, asset allocation, taxes, longevity) for 30 years. The frequency of withdrawal patterns (e.g., annual, quarterly, monthly) has escaped inquiry. This study uses Monte Carlo simulation to show that, despite intuitive reasons to believe that dividing retirement withdrawals into smaller amounts over more frequent intervals might control volatility or sequence of return risk, withdrawal frequency has no effect on retirement withdrawal sustainability. This result is robust to simulated markets characterized by: (1) a random walk, (2) simulated markets that are autocorrelated, (3) historical returns series randomly chosen from historical return records, and (4) historical returns in their original sequence. It also highlights factors (e.g., time in market, matching withdrawals to spending patterns, and maximizing optionality) that can enhance value or increase retiree utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cfp2.1183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal withdrawal frequency for sustainable retirement withdrawals\",\"authors\":\"Stephen M. Horan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cfp2.1183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Researchers have studied factors that influence the sustainability of retirement withdrawals (e.g., withdrawal rate, withdrawal rules, volatility, asset allocation, taxes, longevity) for 30 years. The frequency of withdrawal patterns (e.g., annual, quarterly, monthly) has escaped inquiry. This study uses Monte Carlo simulation to show that, despite intuitive reasons to believe that dividing retirement withdrawals into smaller amounts over more frequent intervals might control volatility or sequence of return risk, withdrawal frequency has no effect on retirement withdrawal sustainability. This result is robust to simulated markets characterized by: (1) a random walk, (2) simulated markets that are autocorrelated, (3) historical returns series randomly chosen from historical return records, and (4) historical returns in their original sequence. It also highlights factors (e.g., time in market, matching withdrawals to spending patterns, and maximizing optionality) that can enhance value or increase retiree utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cfp2.1183\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

30 年来,研究人员一直在研究影响退休取款可持续性的因素(如取款率、取款规则、波动性、资产配置、税收、寿命)。但对提取模式的频率(如每年、每季度、每月)却缺乏研究。本研究使用蒙特卡罗模拟法表明,尽管直觉上人们有理由相信,在更频繁的时间间隔内将退休提取分成更小的金额可能会控制波动性或收益序列风险,但提取频率对退休提取的可持续性没有影响。这一结果在模拟市场中是稳健的:(1)随机漫步,(2)自相关的模拟市场,(3)从历史回报记录中随机选择的历史回报序列,以及(4)原始序列的历史回报。它还强调了可以提高价值或增加退休人员效用的因素(如在市场中的时间、取款与支出模式的匹配以及最大化可选性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal withdrawal frequency for sustainable retirement withdrawals

Optimal withdrawal frequency for sustainable retirement withdrawals

Researchers have studied factors that influence the sustainability of retirement withdrawals (e.g., withdrawal rate, withdrawal rules, volatility, asset allocation, taxes, longevity) for 30 years. The frequency of withdrawal patterns (e.g., annual, quarterly, monthly) has escaped inquiry. This study uses Monte Carlo simulation to show that, despite intuitive reasons to believe that dividing retirement withdrawals into smaller amounts over more frequent intervals might control volatility or sequence of return risk, withdrawal frequency has no effect on retirement withdrawal sustainability. This result is robust to simulated markets characterized by: (1) a random walk, (2) simulated markets that are autocorrelated, (3) historical returns series randomly chosen from historical return records, and (4) historical returns in their original sequence. It also highlights factors (e.g., time in market, matching withdrawals to spending patterns, and maximizing optionality) that can enhance value or increase retiree utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信