Indigo3:用于探索实现方式和常见错误的并行图分析基准套件

Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1145/3665251
Yiqian Liu, Noushin Azami, Avery VanAusdal, Martin Burtscher
{"title":"Indigo3:用于探索实现方式和常见错误的并行图分析基准套件","authors":"Yiqian Liu, Noushin Azami, Avery VanAusdal, Martin Burtscher","doi":"10.1145/3665251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph analytics codes are widely used and tend to exhibit input-dependent behavior, making them particularly interesting for software verification and validation. This paper presents Indigo3, a labeled benchmark suite based on 7 graph algorithms that are implemented in different styles, including versions with deliberately planted bugs. We systematically combine 13 sets of implementation styles and 15 common bug types to create the 41,790 CUDA, OpenMP, and parallel C programs in the suite. Each code is labeled with the styles and bugs it incorporates. We used 4 subsets of Indigo3 to test 5 program-verification tools. Our results show that the tools perform quite differently across the bug types and implementation styles, have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and generally struggle with graph codes. We discuss the styles and bugs that tend to be the most challenging as well as the programming patterns that yield false positives.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigo3: A Parallel Graph Analytics Benchmark Suite for Exploring Implementation Styles and Common Bugs\",\"authors\":\"Yiqian Liu, Noushin Azami, Avery VanAusdal, Martin Burtscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3665251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graph analytics codes are widely used and tend to exhibit input-dependent behavior, making them particularly interesting for software verification and validation. This paper presents Indigo3, a labeled benchmark suite based on 7 graph algorithms that are implemented in different styles, including versions with deliberately planted bugs. We systematically combine 13 sets of implementation styles and 15 common bug types to create the 41,790 CUDA, OpenMP, and parallel C programs in the suite. Each code is labeled with the styles and bugs it incorporates. We used 4 subsets of Indigo3 to test 5 program-verification tools. Our results show that the tools perform quite differently across the bug types and implementation styles, have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and generally struggle with graph codes. We discuss the styles and bugs that tend to be the most challenging as well as the programming patterns that yield false positives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3665251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3665251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图形分析代码应用广泛,往往表现出依赖输入的行为,因此对软件验证和确认特别有意义。本文介绍了 Indigo3,这是一个基于 7 种图形算法的标记基准套件,这些算法以不同风格实现,包括故意植入错误的版本。我们系统地结合了 13 组实现风格和 15 种常见错误类型,创建了该套件中的 41,790 个 CUDA、OpenMP 和并行 C 程序。每段代码都标注了所采用的风格和错误。我们使用 Indigo3 的 4 个子集测试了 5 种程序校验工具。我们的结果表明,这些工具在不同错误类型和实现风格下的表现大相径庭,优缺点各不相同,而且在处理图形代码时普遍存在困难。我们将讨论最具挑战性的错误类型和错误,以及产生误报的编程模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Indigo3: A Parallel Graph Analytics Benchmark Suite for Exploring Implementation Styles and Common Bugs
Graph analytics codes are widely used and tend to exhibit input-dependent behavior, making them particularly interesting for software verification and validation. This paper presents Indigo3, a labeled benchmark suite based on 7 graph algorithms that are implemented in different styles, including versions with deliberately planted bugs. We systematically combine 13 sets of implementation styles and 15 common bug types to create the 41,790 CUDA, OpenMP, and parallel C programs in the suite. Each code is labeled with the styles and bugs it incorporates. We used 4 subsets of Indigo3 to test 5 program-verification tools. Our results show that the tools perform quite differently across the bug types and implementation styles, have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and generally struggle with graph codes. We discuss the styles and bugs that tend to be the most challenging as well as the programming patterns that yield false positives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信