州教育委员会批准的通用阅读筛选器的心理测量学审查

Lindee Morgan, Joseph Wenke, Kristina Dandy
{"title":"州教育委员会批准的通用阅读筛选器的心理测量学审查","authors":"Lindee Morgan, Joseph Wenke, Kristina Dandy","doi":"10.56887/galiteracy.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2023, the Georgia Legislature passed the Georgia Early Literacy Act (HB 538), representing a sweeping reform effort to improve the quality of early reading instruction in the state. HB 538 requires schools to screen children in kindergarten through third grade three times yearly. Related to this requirement, HB 538 requires that the State Board of Education approve a list of 16 universal reading screeners that can: 1) provide relevant information to target instruction, 2) measure foundational literacy skills, 3) identify students who are struggling to acquire reading skills, and 4) be used to monitor progress. The purpose of this review is to provide a supplement to the SBOE’s approved list so that Local Education Agencies (LEAs) can assess the relative psychometric strength of each screener as they select the most appropriate screener for the students they serve. We compiled information regarding each screener's reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity to create an exposition of their strengths and weaknesses. We found that GaDOE's approved list contains numerous tools with acceptable psychometric properties; however, large variability in the amount of psychometric data available for each screener is problematic. LEAs are recommended to consider psychometric strength as a critical factor when selecting an early literacy screener.","PeriodicalId":477361,"journal":{"name":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","volume":"75 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Psychometric Review of Universal Reading Screeners Approved by the State Board of Education\",\"authors\":\"Lindee Morgan, Joseph Wenke, Kristina Dandy\",\"doi\":\"10.56887/galiteracy.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2023, the Georgia Legislature passed the Georgia Early Literacy Act (HB 538), representing a sweeping reform effort to improve the quality of early reading instruction in the state. HB 538 requires schools to screen children in kindergarten through third grade three times yearly. Related to this requirement, HB 538 requires that the State Board of Education approve a list of 16 universal reading screeners that can: 1) provide relevant information to target instruction, 2) measure foundational literacy skills, 3) identify students who are struggling to acquire reading skills, and 4) be used to monitor progress. The purpose of this review is to provide a supplement to the SBOE’s approved list so that Local Education Agencies (LEAs) can assess the relative psychometric strength of each screener as they select the most appropriate screener for the students they serve. We compiled information regarding each screener's reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity to create an exposition of their strengths and weaknesses. We found that GaDOE's approved list contains numerous tools with acceptable psychometric properties; however, large variability in the amount of psychometric data available for each screener is problematic. LEAs are recommended to consider psychometric strength as a critical factor when selecting an early literacy screener.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"volume\":\"75 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年,佐治亚州议会通过了《佐治亚州早期识字法》(HB 538),这是一项全面的改革努力,旨在提高该州早期阅读教学的质量。HB 538 要求学校每年对幼儿园至三年级的儿童进行三次筛查。与此要求相关的是,HB 538 法案要求州教育委员会批准一份包含 16 种通用阅读筛选器的清单,这些筛选器可以1) 为有针对性的教学提供相关信息;2) 衡量基础识字技能;3) 识别在掌握阅读技能方面有困难的学生;4) 用于监测学习进度。本次审查的目的是对 SBOE 批准的清单进行补充,以便地方教育机构(LEA)在为其服务的学生选择最合适的筛查器时,可以评估每种筛查器的相对心理测量强度。我们汇编了有关每个筛查器的可靠性、有效性、灵敏度和特异性的信息,以阐述它们的优缺点。我们发现,GaDOE 批准的清单中包含了许多具有可接受的心理测量特性的工具;但是,每个筛查工具的心理测量数据量差异很大,这是一个问题。建议地方教育机构在选择早期识字筛查工具时,将心理测量强度作为一个关键因素来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Psychometric Review of Universal Reading Screeners Approved by the State Board of Education
In 2023, the Georgia Legislature passed the Georgia Early Literacy Act (HB 538), representing a sweeping reform effort to improve the quality of early reading instruction in the state. HB 538 requires schools to screen children in kindergarten through third grade three times yearly. Related to this requirement, HB 538 requires that the State Board of Education approve a list of 16 universal reading screeners that can: 1) provide relevant information to target instruction, 2) measure foundational literacy skills, 3) identify students who are struggling to acquire reading skills, and 4) be used to monitor progress. The purpose of this review is to provide a supplement to the SBOE’s approved list so that Local Education Agencies (LEAs) can assess the relative psychometric strength of each screener as they select the most appropriate screener for the students they serve. We compiled information regarding each screener's reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity to create an exposition of their strengths and weaknesses. We found that GaDOE's approved list contains numerous tools with acceptable psychometric properties; however, large variability in the amount of psychometric data available for each screener is problematic. LEAs are recommended to consider psychometric strength as a critical factor when selecting an early literacy screener.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信