生物教学风格分类:文献系统回顾

E. Doğan, Cem Gerçek
{"title":"生物教学风格分类:文献系统回顾","authors":"E. Doğan, Cem Gerçek","doi":"10.30786/jef.1385243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyse systematically the articles on teaching biology and concerning style classification which were published in international and national journals according to criteria set. For this purpose, articles of style classification which were conducted in the period between 1990 and 2022 and directed to teaching biology at pre-school, primary school, secondary school and higher education levels were reached. 48 articles published in international journals and 88 articles published in national journals were put to content analysis within the scope of the study. They were considered in terms of their theoretical framework, key words they had, methods they used, types of data sources used in their sample, the countries where they were conducted and the years when they were conducted and the conclusions they reached according to the criteria set in the sub-problems. It was found accordingly that mostly activity-based styles were examined, that “learning style(s)” were the most frequently used key words, that the research mostly used quantitative methods and that they were mostly conducted with the participation of teachers. It was also found that the articles published in international journals were mostly conducted in Turkey. The articles were observed to increase as of 2013. The results of journal articles research analysed in the final sub-problem were given in detail in four categories. This current study makes various recommendations for style classification studies concerning biology teaching.","PeriodicalId":513800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Future","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Style Classifications in Biology Teaching: A Systematic Review of Literature\",\"authors\":\"E. Doğan, Cem Gerçek\",\"doi\":\"10.30786/jef.1385243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyse systematically the articles on teaching biology and concerning style classification which were published in international and national journals according to criteria set. For this purpose, articles of style classification which were conducted in the period between 1990 and 2022 and directed to teaching biology at pre-school, primary school, secondary school and higher education levels were reached. 48 articles published in international journals and 88 articles published in national journals were put to content analysis within the scope of the study. They were considered in terms of their theoretical framework, key words they had, methods they used, types of data sources used in their sample, the countries where they were conducted and the years when they were conducted and the conclusions they reached according to the criteria set in the sub-problems. It was found accordingly that mostly activity-based styles were examined, that “learning style(s)” were the most frequently used key words, that the research mostly used quantitative methods and that they were mostly conducted with the participation of teachers. It was also found that the articles published in international journals were mostly conducted in Turkey. The articles were observed to increase as of 2013. The results of journal articles research analysed in the final sub-problem were given in detail in four categories. This current study makes various recommendations for style classification studies concerning biology teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Future\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1385243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1385243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在根据设定的标准,系统分析在国际和国内期刊上发表的有关生物教学和文体分类的文章。为此,本研究选取了 1990 年至 2022 年期间针对学前、小学、中学和高等教育阶段的生物教学进行文体分类的文章。在研究范围内,对发表在国际期刊上的 48 篇文章和发表在国内期刊上的 88 篇文章进行了内容分析。根据子问题中设定的标准,对这些文章的理论框架、关键词、使用的方法、样本中使用的数据来源类型、进行研究的国家和年份以及得出的结论进行了审议。据此发现,所研究的风格大多以活动为基础,"学习风格 "是最常使用的关键词,研究大多使用定量方法,而且大多是在教师的参与下进行的。研究还发现,在国际期刊上发表的文章大多是在土耳其进行的。据观察,自2013年以来,此类文章有所增加。在最后一个子问题中,对期刊论文的研究结果进行了分析,并详细列出了四个类别。本研究为有关生物教学的文体分类研究提出了各种建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Style Classifications in Biology Teaching: A Systematic Review of Literature
This study aims to analyse systematically the articles on teaching biology and concerning style classification which were published in international and national journals according to criteria set. For this purpose, articles of style classification which were conducted in the period between 1990 and 2022 and directed to teaching biology at pre-school, primary school, secondary school and higher education levels were reached. 48 articles published in international journals and 88 articles published in national journals were put to content analysis within the scope of the study. They were considered in terms of their theoretical framework, key words they had, methods they used, types of data sources used in their sample, the countries where they were conducted and the years when they were conducted and the conclusions they reached according to the criteria set in the sub-problems. It was found accordingly that mostly activity-based styles were examined, that “learning style(s)” were the most frequently used key words, that the research mostly used quantitative methods and that they were mostly conducted with the participation of teachers. It was also found that the articles published in international journals were mostly conducted in Turkey. The articles were observed to increase as of 2013. The results of journal articles research analysed in the final sub-problem were given in detail in four categories. This current study makes various recommendations for style classification studies concerning biology teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信