文化亲密,文化距离:对波兰罗马尼亚人进行人类学研究的方法论问题

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković, Ewa Nowicka
{"title":"文化亲密,文化距离:对波兰罗马尼亚人进行人类学研究的方法论问题","authors":"Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković, Ewa Nowicka","doi":"10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on a comparison of two sets of in-depth, face-to-face interviews among Romanians living in Poland about their perceptions of the country and society, and their migrant experiences. The interviews were conducted five years apart, using the same guide, but carried out by Polish interviewers in the first case, and by a Romanian interviewer in the second. Comparative analysis of the material gained in this process reveals that, despite similar content in interviewee responses, the standing of the interviewer was by no means neutral. Crucial for the volume, type, and nature of the collected data – as well as for its interpretation – is the interviewer’s identity. In this regard, the study draws on Michael’s Herzfeld’s concept of ‘cultural intimacy’ to explain the mutual reproduction of different levels of identity and to develop a framework for analyzing the interaction between the social scientists and their interlocutors.","PeriodicalId":36723,"journal":{"name":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural intimacy, cultural distance: methodological aspects of anthropological research into Romanians in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković, Ewa Nowicka\",\"doi\":\"10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on a comparison of two sets of in-depth, face-to-face interviews among Romanians living in Poland about their perceptions of the country and society, and their migrant experiences. The interviews were conducted five years apart, using the same guide, but carried out by Polish interviewers in the first case, and by a Romanian interviewer in the second. Comparative analysis of the material gained in this process reveals that, despite similar content in interviewee responses, the standing of the interviewer was by no means neutral. Crucial for the volume, type, and nature of the collected data – as well as for its interpretation – is the interviewer’s identity. In this regard, the study draws on Michael’s Herzfeld’s concept of ‘cultural intimacy’ to explain the mutual reproduction of different levels of identity and to develop a framework for analyzing the interaction between the social scientists and their interlocutors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是对居住在波兰的罗马尼亚人进行两组面对面的深入访谈,比较他们对波兰和社会的看法,以及他们的移民经历。两组访谈相隔五年,使用相同的指南,但第一组由波兰访谈员进行,第二组由罗马尼亚访谈员进行。对这一过程中获得的材料进行比较分析后发现,尽管受访者的回答内容相似,但采访者的地位绝非中立。访谈者的身份对所收集数据的数量、类型和性质以及对数据的解释至关重要。在这方面,本研究借鉴了迈克尔-赫茨菲尔德(Michael's Herzfeld)的 "文化亲密关系"(cultural intimacy)概念,以解释不同层次身份的相互再现,并为分析社会科学家与其对话者之间的互动建立一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural intimacy, cultural distance: methodological aspects of anthropological research into Romanians in Poland
This study focuses on a comparison of two sets of in-depth, face-to-face interviews among Romanians living in Poland about their perceptions of the country and society, and their migrant experiences. The interviews were conducted five years apart, using the same guide, but carried out by Polish interviewers in the first case, and by a Romanian interviewer in the second. Comparative analysis of the material gained in this process reveals that, despite similar content in interviewee responses, the standing of the interviewer was by no means neutral. Crucial for the volume, type, and nature of the collected data – as well as for its interpretation – is the interviewer’s identity. In this regard, the study draws on Michael’s Herzfeld’s concept of ‘cultural intimacy’ to explain the mutual reproduction of different levels of identity and to develop a framework for analyzing the interaction between the social scientists and their interlocutors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies
Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信