MASH TL-3 对夏威夷交通部 34 英寸高美观桥梁轨道与行人轨道和人行道方案的评估高美观桥栏与行人栏杆和人行道方案的评估

C. Stolle, R. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller, S. Changizian, Dean Takiguchi, Kimberly M. Okamura, James Fu
{"title":"MASH TL-3 对夏威夷交通部 34 英寸高美观桥梁轨道与行人轨道和人行道方案的评估高美观桥栏与行人栏杆和人行道方案的评估","authors":"C. Stolle, R. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller, S. Changizian, Dean Takiguchi, Kimberly M. Okamura, James Fu","doi":"10.1177/03611981241244791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommended guidelines were provided for the shape and size of aesthetic features added to roadside barriers in National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 554, but limited full-scale crash testing has been performed on barriers with aesthetic features, especially in combination with sidewalks and pedestrian railings, each of which may contribute to increased propensity for vehicle snag, vehicle instabilities, and occupant risk metrics. A Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) bridge rail design with vertical faces and aesthetic recessed panels was evaluated to Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) TL-3 impact conditions in three configurations: stand-alone; in combination with a pedestrian handrail installed on the back side of the barrier system; and in combination with a pedestrian rail and 6 ft long x 6 in. tall sidewalk. The 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail consisted of segments measuring 11 ft long at upstream and downstream ends and three 22 ft long, consecutive interior segments. MASH test designation Nos. 3-10 and 3-11 were performed on the stand-alone system and with the sidewalk and pedestrian rail, and test designation 3-11 was performed on the system on level terrain with handrail. Results indicated that the HDOT 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail was crashworthy in all of the configurations evaluated.","PeriodicalId":509035,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MASH TL-3 Evaluation of the Hawaii Department of Transportation 34 in. Tall Aesthetic Bridge Rail with Pedestrian Rail and Sidewalk Options\",\"authors\":\"C. Stolle, R. Bielenberg, Ronald K. Faller, S. Changizian, Dean Takiguchi, Kimberly M. Okamura, James Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03611981241244791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recommended guidelines were provided for the shape and size of aesthetic features added to roadside barriers in National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 554, but limited full-scale crash testing has been performed on barriers with aesthetic features, especially in combination with sidewalks and pedestrian railings, each of which may contribute to increased propensity for vehicle snag, vehicle instabilities, and occupant risk metrics. A Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) bridge rail design with vertical faces and aesthetic recessed panels was evaluated to Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) TL-3 impact conditions in three configurations: stand-alone; in combination with a pedestrian handrail installed on the back side of the barrier system; and in combination with a pedestrian rail and 6 ft long x 6 in. tall sidewalk. The 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail consisted of segments measuring 11 ft long at upstream and downstream ends and three 22 ft long, consecutive interior segments. MASH test designation Nos. 3-10 and 3-11 were performed on the stand-alone system and with the sidewalk and pedestrian rail, and test designation 3-11 was performed on the system on level terrain with handrail. Results indicated that the HDOT 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail was crashworthy in all of the configurations evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241244791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241244791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国家合作公路研究计划第 554 号报告对路边障碍物的美学特征的形状和大小提出了建议性指导原则,但对具有美学特征的障碍物进行的全面碰撞测试却很有限,特别是与人行道和行人栏杆结合使用时,每种美学特征都可能增加车辆卡住的可能性、车辆不稳定性和乘员风险指标。夏威夷交通部 (HDOT) 根据《安全硬件评估手册》(MASH) TL-3 的影响条件,在三种配置下对具有垂直面和美观凹板的桥梁护栏设计进行了评估:独立;与安装在护栏系统背面的行人扶手相结合;与行人护栏和 6 英尺长 x 6 英寸高的人行道相结合。34 英寸高的美观混凝土桥梁护栏由上下游两端 11 英尺长的部分和三个 22 英尺长的连续内部部分组成。第 3-10 号和第 3-11 号 MASH 试验是在独立系统以及人行道和人行栏杆上进行的,第 3-11 号试验是在带扶手的平坦地形上对系统进行的。结果表明,在所有评估配置中,HDOT 34 英寸高的美观混凝土桥梁护栏都具有防撞性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MASH TL-3 Evaluation of the Hawaii Department of Transportation 34 in. Tall Aesthetic Bridge Rail with Pedestrian Rail and Sidewalk Options
Recommended guidelines were provided for the shape and size of aesthetic features added to roadside barriers in National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 554, but limited full-scale crash testing has been performed on barriers with aesthetic features, especially in combination with sidewalks and pedestrian railings, each of which may contribute to increased propensity for vehicle snag, vehicle instabilities, and occupant risk metrics. A Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) bridge rail design with vertical faces and aesthetic recessed panels was evaluated to Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) TL-3 impact conditions in three configurations: stand-alone; in combination with a pedestrian handrail installed on the back side of the barrier system; and in combination with a pedestrian rail and 6 ft long x 6 in. tall sidewalk. The 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail consisted of segments measuring 11 ft long at upstream and downstream ends and three 22 ft long, consecutive interior segments. MASH test designation Nos. 3-10 and 3-11 were performed on the stand-alone system and with the sidewalk and pedestrian rail, and test designation 3-11 was performed on the system on level terrain with handrail. Results indicated that the HDOT 34 in. tall aesthetic concrete bridge rail was crashworthy in all of the configurations evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信