回顾过去,展望未来:当前道德发展研究的历史教训

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
E. Turiel
{"title":"回顾过去,展望未来:当前道德发展研究的历史教训","authors":"E. Turiel","doi":"10.1159/000539407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A history of research on the development of morality yields valuable lessons. In 1932 Piaget examined children’s moral judgments, proposing that actions feedback on judgments, which in turn feedback on actions. He analyzed children’s entry into the moral realm through a sense of obligation. Subsequently, Kohlberg (1971) proposed a sequence entailing differentiations of justice from non-moral considerations, emphasizing epistemology, and how one level of development is more adequate than prior levels. The Piaget and Kohlberg differentiation models of development have not held up to subsequent evidence (Turiel, 1983a); young children distinguish morality from social conventions as well as from the domain of personal jurisdiction. History points to issues requiring further analyses. These include expositions of: children’s entry into the moral domain; developmental transformations and the bases for greater adequacy; interrelations between judgments and actions; and connections between judgments and emotions, including study of on-going, background dispositions labeled sentiments.","PeriodicalId":47837,"journal":{"name":"Human Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Back and Moving Forward: Historical Lessons for Current Research on Moral Development\",\"authors\":\"E. Turiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A history of research on the development of morality yields valuable lessons. In 1932 Piaget examined children’s moral judgments, proposing that actions feedback on judgments, which in turn feedback on actions. He analyzed children’s entry into the moral realm through a sense of obligation. Subsequently, Kohlberg (1971) proposed a sequence entailing differentiations of justice from non-moral considerations, emphasizing epistemology, and how one level of development is more adequate than prior levels. The Piaget and Kohlberg differentiation models of development have not held up to subsequent evidence (Turiel, 1983a); young children distinguish morality from social conventions as well as from the domain of personal jurisdiction. History points to issues requiring further analyses. These include expositions of: children’s entry into the moral domain; developmental transformations and the bases for greater adequacy; interrelations between judgments and actions; and connections between judgments and emotions, including study of on-going, background dispositions labeled sentiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539407\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德发展研究的历史提供了宝贵的经验。1932 年,皮亚杰研究了儿童的道德判断,提出行为反馈于判断,判断又反馈于行为。他分析了儿童通过义务感进入道德领域的过程。随后,科尔伯格(Kohlberg,1971 年)提出了一个序列,包含正义与非道德考虑的区别,强调认识论,以及一个发展水平如何比之前的水平更充分。皮亚杰和科尔伯格的发展分化模型在后来的证据面前并不成立(Turiel, 1983a);幼儿将道德与社会习俗以及个人管辖领域区分开来。历史指出了需要进一步分析的问题。这些问题包括:儿童进入道德领域的阐述;发展的转变和更充分的基础;判断与行动之间的相互关系;判断与情感之间的联系,包括对持续的、有背景倾向的、贴有标签的情感的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Looking Back and Moving Forward: Historical Lessons for Current Research on Moral Development
A history of research on the development of morality yields valuable lessons. In 1932 Piaget examined children’s moral judgments, proposing that actions feedback on judgments, which in turn feedback on actions. He analyzed children’s entry into the moral realm through a sense of obligation. Subsequently, Kohlberg (1971) proposed a sequence entailing differentiations of justice from non-moral considerations, emphasizing epistemology, and how one level of development is more adequate than prior levels. The Piaget and Kohlberg differentiation models of development have not held up to subsequent evidence (Turiel, 1983a); young children distinguish morality from social conventions as well as from the domain of personal jurisdiction. History points to issues requiring further analyses. These include expositions of: children’s entry into the moral domain; developmental transformations and the bases for greater adequacy; interrelations between judgments and actions; and connections between judgments and emotions, including study of on-going, background dispositions labeled sentiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Development
Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Distinguished by its international recognition since 1958, "Human Development" publishes in-depth conceptual articles, commentaries, and essay book reviews that advance our understanding of developmental phenomena. Contributions serve to raise theoretical issues, flesh out interesting and potentially powerful ideas, and differentiate key constructs. Contributions are welcomed from varied disciplines, including anthropology, biology, education, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信