影响重症监护室模型信息精准配药软件整合和可用性的因素。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1786978
Ming G Chai, Natasha A Roberts, Chelsea Dobbins, Jason A Roberts, Menino O Cotta
{"title":"影响重症监护室模型信息精准配药软件整合和可用性的因素。","authors":"Ming G Chai, Natasha A Roberts, Chelsea Dobbins, Jason A Roberts, Menino O Cotta","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients is challenging and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) software may be used to optimize dosing in these patients. However, few intensive care units (ICU) currently adopt MIPD software use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> To determine the usability of MIPD software perceived by ICU clinicians and identify implementation barriers and enablers of software in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Clinicians (pharmacists and medical staff) who participated in a wider multicenter study using MIPD software were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Participants scored the industry validated Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ, assessing software usability) and Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2, assessing factors impacting software acceptance) survey. Semistructured interviews were used to explore survey responses. The framework approach was used to identify factors influencing software usability and integration into the ICU from the survey and interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seven of the eight eligible clinicians agreed to participate in the study. The PSSUQ usability scores ranked poorer than the reference norms (2.95 vs. 2.62). The TAM2 survey favorably ranked acceptance in all domains, except image. Qualitatively, key enablers to workflow integration included clear and accessible data entry, visual representation of recommendations, involvement of specialist clinicians, and local governance of software use. Barriers included rigid data entry systems and nonconformity of recommendations to local practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Participants scored the MIPD software below the threshold that implies good usability. Factors such as availability of software support by specialist clinicians was important to participants while rigid data entry was found to be a deterrent.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Integration and Usability of Model-Informed Precision Dosing Software in the Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Ming G Chai, Natasha A Roberts, Chelsea Dobbins, Jason A Roberts, Menino O Cotta\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1786978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients is challenging and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) software may be used to optimize dosing in these patients. However, few intensive care units (ICU) currently adopt MIPD software use.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> To determine the usability of MIPD software perceived by ICU clinicians and identify implementation barriers and enablers of software in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Clinicians (pharmacists and medical staff) who participated in a wider multicenter study using MIPD software were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Participants scored the industry validated Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ, assessing software usability) and Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2, assessing factors impacting software acceptance) survey. Semistructured interviews were used to explore survey responses. The framework approach was used to identify factors influencing software usability and integration into the ICU from the survey and interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Seven of the eight eligible clinicians agreed to participate in the study. The PSSUQ usability scores ranked poorer than the reference norms (2.95 vs. 2.62). The TAM2 survey favorably ranked acceptance in all domains, except image. Qualitatively, key enablers to workflow integration included clear and accessible data entry, visual representation of recommendations, involvement of specialist clinicians, and local governance of software use. Barriers included rigid data entry systems and nonconformity of recommendations to local practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Participants scored the MIPD software below the threshold that implies good usability. Factors such as availability of software support by specialist clinicians was important to participants while rigid data entry was found to be a deterrent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098592/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786978\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症患者的抗菌药物剂量具有挑战性,而模型信息精准剂量(MIPD)软件可用于优化这些患者的剂量。然而,目前采用 MIPD 软件的重症监护病房(ICU)为数不多:目的:确定重症监护室临床医生对 MIPD 软件可用性的看法,并找出重症监护室使用该软件的障碍和有利因素:方法:邀请参加过使用 MIPD 软件的广泛多中心研究的临床医生(药剂师和医务人员)参加这项混合方法研究。参与者对经过行业验证的研究后系统可用性问卷(PSSUQ,评估软件可用性)和技术接受度模型 2(TAM2,评估影响软件接受度的因素)调查进行评分。采用半结构式访谈来探讨调查反馈。采用框架法从调查和访谈数据中找出影响软件可用性和集成到重症监护病房的因素:八位符合条件的临床医生中有七位同意参与研究。PSSUQ的可用性得分低于参考标准(2.95 vs. 2.62)。在 TAM2 调查中,除图像外,所有领域的接受度都很高。从定性角度看,工作流程整合的主要促进因素包括清晰易用的数据录入、建议的可视化呈现、专科临床医生的参与以及软件使用的本地管理。障碍包括僵化的数据录入系统和建议不符合当地实际情况:结论:与会者对 MIPD 软件的评分低于意味着良好可用性的临界值。由专业临床医生提供软件支持等因素对参与者很重要,而僵化的数据录入则是一个阻碍因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Integration and Usability of Model-Informed Precision Dosing Software in the Intensive Care Unit.

Background:  Antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients is challenging and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) software may be used to optimize dosing in these patients. However, few intensive care units (ICU) currently adopt MIPD software use.

Objectives:  To determine the usability of MIPD software perceived by ICU clinicians and identify implementation barriers and enablers of software in the ICU.

Methods:  Clinicians (pharmacists and medical staff) who participated in a wider multicenter study using MIPD software were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Participants scored the industry validated Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ, assessing software usability) and Technology Acceptance Model 2 (TAM2, assessing factors impacting software acceptance) survey. Semistructured interviews were used to explore survey responses. The framework approach was used to identify factors influencing software usability and integration into the ICU from the survey and interview data.

Results:  Seven of the eight eligible clinicians agreed to participate in the study. The PSSUQ usability scores ranked poorer than the reference norms (2.95 vs. 2.62). The TAM2 survey favorably ranked acceptance in all domains, except image. Qualitatively, key enablers to workflow integration included clear and accessible data entry, visual representation of recommendations, involvement of specialist clinicians, and local governance of software use. Barriers included rigid data entry systems and nonconformity of recommendations to local practices.

Conclusion:  Participants scored the MIPD software below the threshold that implies good usability. Factors such as availability of software support by specialist clinicians was important to participants while rigid data entry was found to be a deterrent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信