终末期肾病前瞻性付费系统对肾移植失败患者使用腹膜透析的影响。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1159/000539062
Ali I Gardezi, Zhongyu Yuan, Fahad Aziz, Sandesh Parajuli, Didier Mandelbrot, Micah R Chan, Brad C Astor
{"title":"终末期肾病前瞻性付费系统对肾移植失败患者使用腹膜透析的影响。","authors":"Ali I Gardezi, Zhongyu Yuan, Fahad Aziz, Sandesh Parajuli, Didier Mandelbrot, Micah R Chan, Brad C Astor","doi":"10.1159/000539062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced an End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System (PPS) in 2011 to increase the utilization of home dialysis modalities, including peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several studies have shown a significant increase in PD utilization after PPS implementation. However, its impact on patients with kidney allograft failure remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using data from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) that include all adult kidney transplant recipients with allograft failure who started dialysis between 2005 and 2019. We compared the PD utilization in the pre-PPS period (2005-2010) to the fully implemented post-PPS period (2014-2019) for early (within 90 days) and late (91-365 days) PD experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,507 adult recipients with allograft failure started dialysis during the study period. There was no difference in early PD utilization between the pre-PPS and the post-PPS period in either immediate change (0.3% increase; 95% CI: -1.95%, 2.54%; p = 0.79) or rate of change over time (0.28% increase per year; 95% CI: -0.16%, 0.72%; p = 0.18). Subgroup analyses revealed a trend toward higher PD utilization post-PPS in for-profit and large-volume dialysis units. There was a significant increase in PD utilization in the post-PPS period in units with low PD experience in the pre-PPS period. Similar findings were seen for the late PD experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPS did not significantly increase the overall utilization of PD in patients initiating dialysis after allograft failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"551-560"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System on Utilization of Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Kidney Allograft Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Ali I Gardezi, Zhongyu Yuan, Fahad Aziz, Sandesh Parajuli, Didier Mandelbrot, Micah R Chan, Brad C Astor\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced an End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System (PPS) in 2011 to increase the utilization of home dialysis modalities, including peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several studies have shown a significant increase in PD utilization after PPS implementation. However, its impact on patients with kidney allograft failure remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using data from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) that include all adult kidney transplant recipients with allograft failure who started dialysis between 2005 and 2019. We compared the PD utilization in the pre-PPS period (2005-2010) to the fully implemented post-PPS period (2014-2019) for early (within 90 days) and late (91-365 days) PD experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,507 adult recipients with allograft failure started dialysis during the study period. There was no difference in early PD utilization between the pre-PPS and the post-PPS period in either immediate change (0.3% increase; 95% CI: -1.95%, 2.54%; p = 0.79) or rate of change over time (0.28% increase per year; 95% CI: -0.16%, 0.72%; p = 0.18). Subgroup analyses revealed a trend toward higher PD utilization post-PPS in for-profit and large-volume dialysis units. There was a significant increase in PD utilization in the post-PPS period in units with low PD experience in the pre-PPS period. Similar findings were seen for the late PD experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPS did not significantly increase the overall utilization of PD in patients initiating dialysis after allograft failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于 2011 年推出了终末期肾病(ESRD)预付费系统(PPS),以提高包括腹膜透析(PD)在内的家庭透析方式的使用率。多项研究表明,PPS 实施后腹膜透析的使用率大幅提高。然而,其对肾移植失败患者的影响仍不得而知:我们利用美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)中的数据进行了间断时间序列(ITS)分析,这些数据包括 2005 年至 2019 年期间开始透析的所有成人肾移植受者和异体移植失败患者。我们比较了 PPS 实施前(2005-2010 年)和 PPS 全面实施后(2014-2019 年)的早期(90 天内)和晚期(91-365 天)PD 使用情况。PPS实施前和PPS实施后的早期透析使用率在即时变化(增加0.3%;95%CI:-1.95%,2.54%;P=0.79)或随时间变化的速率(每年增加0.28%;95%CI:-0.16%,0.72%;P=0.18)方面均无差异。分组分析显示,PPS 后营利性透析单位和大容量透析单位的 PD 使用率呈上升趋势。在 PPS 实施前,PD 使用率较低的透析单位在 PPS 实施后的使用率明显增加。结论:结论:PPS 并未明显增加同种异体移植失败后开始透析的患者对 PD 的总体使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System on Utilization of Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Kidney Allograft Failure.

Introduction: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services introduced an End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System (PPS) in 2011 to increase the utilization of home dialysis modalities, including peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several studies have shown a significant increase in PD utilization after PPS implementation. However, its impact on patients with kidney allograft failure remains unknown.

Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using data from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) that include all adult kidney transplant recipients with allograft failure who started dialysis between 2005 and 2019. We compared the PD utilization in the pre-PPS period (2005-2010) to the fully implemented post-PPS period (2014-2019) for early (within 90 days) and late (91-365 days) PD experience.

Results: A total of 27,507 adult recipients with allograft failure started dialysis during the study period. There was no difference in early PD utilization between the pre-PPS and the post-PPS period in either immediate change (0.3% increase; 95% CI: -1.95%, 2.54%; p = 0.79) or rate of change over time (0.28% increase per year; 95% CI: -0.16%, 0.72%; p = 0.18). Subgroup analyses revealed a trend toward higher PD utilization post-PPS in for-profit and large-volume dialysis units. There was a significant increase in PD utilization in the post-PPS period in units with low PD experience in the pre-PPS period. Similar findings were seen for the late PD experience.

Conclusion: PPS did not significantly increase the overall utilization of PD in patients initiating dialysis after allograft failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信