法国 HTA 机构对真实世界证据的要求可以规划吗?2016年至2021年医药产品评估的详尽回顾性病例对照研究。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Judith Fernandez, Céleste Babin, Camille Thomassin, Floriane Pelon, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Margaret Galbraith, Driss Berdaï, Antoine Pariente, Francesco Salvo, Antoine Vanier
{"title":"法国 HTA 机构对真实世界证据的要求可以规划吗?2016年至2021年医药产品评估的详尽回顾性病例对照研究。","authors":"Judith Fernandez, Céleste Babin, Camille Thomassin, Floriane Pelon, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Margaret Galbraith, Driss Berdaï, Antoine Pariente, Francesco Salvo, Antoine Vanier","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324000291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In France, decisions for pricing and reimbursement for medicinal products are based on appraisals performed by the National authority for health (<i>Haute Autorité de Santé</i> (HAS)). During the appraisal process, additional real-world evidence can be requested as \"Post-Registration Studies\" (PRS) when there are uncertainties in evidence that could be resolved by additional data collection. To facilitate PRS planning, a retrospective exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of medicinal products associated with a PRS request.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis encompassed all appraisals finalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 and compared products for which the appraisal led to a PRS request with those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred positive opinions for reimbursement were identified, with a PRS request present in 17 percent (n = 103) of cases. The independent characteristics associated with a PRS request were a mild or moderate clinical benefit score, a major to moderate or minor clinical added value score, previous availability under an early access program, and certain therapeutic areas (neurology, pulmonology, and endocrinology). These findings suggest two different profiles of PRS requests: (i) products for which there is uncertainty in the size of the clinical benefit and (ii) innovative products for which a substantial benefit is expected but uncertainties persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results will assist health technology developers to better anticipate data generation to promptly address uncertainties identified by HAS. It may also help HAS and other assessment agencies to work together to improve postlaunch evidence generation according to the characteristics of the medicinal products.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021.\",\"authors\":\"Judith Fernandez, Céleste Babin, Camille Thomassin, Floriane Pelon, Sophie Kelley, Pierre Cochat, Margaret Galbraith, Driss Berdaï, Antoine Pariente, Francesco Salvo, Antoine Vanier\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324000291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In France, decisions for pricing and reimbursement for medicinal products are based on appraisals performed by the National authority for health (<i>Haute Autorité de Santé</i> (HAS)). During the appraisal process, additional real-world evidence can be requested as \\\"Post-Registration Studies\\\" (PRS) when there are uncertainties in evidence that could be resolved by additional data collection. To facilitate PRS planning, a retrospective exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of medicinal products associated with a PRS request.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis encompassed all appraisals finalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 and compared products for which the appraisal led to a PRS request with those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred positive opinions for reimbursement were identified, with a PRS request present in 17 percent (n = 103) of cases. The independent characteristics associated with a PRS request were a mild or moderate clinical benefit score, a major to moderate or minor clinical added value score, previous availability under an early access program, and certain therapeutic areas (neurology, pulmonology, and endocrinology). These findings suggest two different profiles of PRS requests: (i) products for which there is uncertainty in the size of the clinical benefit and (ii) innovative products for which a substantial benefit is expected but uncertainties persist.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results will assist health technology developers to better anticipate data generation to promptly address uncertainties identified by HAS. It may also help HAS and other assessment agencies to work together to improve postlaunch evidence generation according to the characteristics of the medicinal products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324000291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在法国,医药产品的定价和报销决定基于国家卫生机构(HAS)的评估。在评估过程中,如果证据存在不确定性,可以通过额外的数据收集来解决,则可以要求额外的真实世界证据作为 "注册后研究"(PRS)。为促进 PRS 的规划,我们进行了一项回顾性探索分析,以确定与 PRS 申请相关的医药产品的特征:该分析涵盖了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间最终完成的所有评估,并对评估导致提出 PRS 申请的产品与未导致提出 PRS 申请的产品进行了比较:结果:共确定了 600 份积极的报销意见,其中 17% 的案例(n = 103)提出了 PRS 申请。与PRS申请相关的独立特征是轻度或中度临床获益评分、主要至中度或次要临床附加值评分、曾在早期准入计划下上市,以及某些治疗领域(神经病学、肺病学和内分泌学)。这些研究结果表明,PRS 申请有两种不同的情况:(i) 临床效益大小不确定的产品;(ii) 预计可带来巨大效益但仍存在不确定性的创新产品:这些结果将有助于卫生技术开发人员更好地预测数据生成情况,以便及时处理 HAS 确定的不确定性。这些结果还有助于 HAS 和其他评估机构共同努力,根据医药产品的特点改进产品上市后的证据生成工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021.

Objectives: In France, decisions for pricing and reimbursement for medicinal products are based on appraisals performed by the National authority for health (Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS)). During the appraisal process, additional real-world evidence can be requested as "Post-Registration Studies" (PRS) when there are uncertainties in evidence that could be resolved by additional data collection. To facilitate PRS planning, a retrospective exploratory analysis was conducted to identify the characteristics of medicinal products associated with a PRS request.

Methods: This analysis encompassed all appraisals finalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 and compared products for which the appraisal led to a PRS request with those that did not.

Results: Six hundred positive opinions for reimbursement were identified, with a PRS request present in 17 percent (n = 103) of cases. The independent characteristics associated with a PRS request were a mild or moderate clinical benefit score, a major to moderate or minor clinical added value score, previous availability under an early access program, and certain therapeutic areas (neurology, pulmonology, and endocrinology). These findings suggest two different profiles of PRS requests: (i) products for which there is uncertainty in the size of the clinical benefit and (ii) innovative products for which a substantial benefit is expected but uncertainties persist.

Conclusions: These results will assist health technology developers to better anticipate data generation to promptly address uncertainties identified by HAS. It may also help HAS and other assessment agencies to work together to improve postlaunch evidence generation according to the characteristics of the medicinal products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信