Ryan J Lefevre, Christina A Jelly, Cynthia Schmelz, Jeremy Bennett, Yaping Shi, Matthew Shotwell, Jeffrey Ford, Antonio Hernandez
{"title":"i-gel® 和 LMA® Supreme™ 在促进纤维气管插管方面的比较:前瞻性随机试验。","authors":"Ryan J Lefevre, Christina A Jelly, Cynthia Schmelz, Jeremy Bennett, Yaping Shi, Matthew Shotwell, Jeffrey Ford, Antonio Hernandez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supraglottic airway (SGA) is an alternative to endotracheal intubation, however endotracheal intubation is often essential. One method to convert from an SGA to an endotracheal tube (ETT) is utilizing the SGA as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided advancement of an Aintree catheter (airway exchange catheter), and exchange of the SGA for an ETT. In this prospective randomized study, we compared two SGA devices in facilitating this exchange. Subjects were randomized to receive either the i-gel® or LMA® Supreme™ SGA. The SGA was placed and an Aintree intubation catheter was inserted through the SGA over a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Next, the SGA was removed, leaving the Aintree within the trachea, and an ETT was placed over the Aintree catheter and advanced into the trachea. The i-gel group exhibited shorter time to successful intubation (median, 191 vs. 434 seconds; <i>P</i> = .002). The i-gel group also had fewer study subjects requiring more than one attempt for successful Aintree placement (33% vs. 75%, <i>P</i> = .02). The i-gel group showed superior laryngeal view score (LVS) (6 vs. 4; <i>P</i> = .003). The i-gel SGA achieved a faster time to successful intubation, higher rate of first attempt Aintree placement, and superior LVS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"92 3","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of i-gel® and LMA® Supreme™ for Facilitating Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan J Lefevre, Christina A Jelly, Cynthia Schmelz, Jeremy Bennett, Yaping Shi, Matthew Shotwell, Jeffrey Ford, Antonio Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Supraglottic airway (SGA) is an alternative to endotracheal intubation, however endotracheal intubation is often essential. One method to convert from an SGA to an endotracheal tube (ETT) is utilizing the SGA as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided advancement of an Aintree catheter (airway exchange catheter), and exchange of the SGA for an ETT. In this prospective randomized study, we compared two SGA devices in facilitating this exchange. Subjects were randomized to receive either the i-gel® or LMA® Supreme™ SGA. The SGA was placed and an Aintree intubation catheter was inserted through the SGA over a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Next, the SGA was removed, leaving the Aintree within the trachea, and an ETT was placed over the Aintree catheter and advanced into the trachea. The i-gel group exhibited shorter time to successful intubation (median, 191 vs. 434 seconds; <i>P</i> = .002). The i-gel group also had fewer study subjects requiring more than one attempt for successful Aintree placement (33% vs. 75%, <i>P</i> = .02). The i-gel group showed superior laryngeal view score (LVS) (6 vs. 4; <i>P</i> = .003). The i-gel SGA achieved a faster time to successful intubation, higher rate of first attempt Aintree placement, and superior LVS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AANA journal\",\"volume\":\"92 3\",\"pages\":\"197-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AANA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of i-gel® and LMA® Supreme™ for Facilitating Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Supraglottic airway (SGA) is an alternative to endotracheal intubation, however endotracheal intubation is often essential. One method to convert from an SGA to an endotracheal tube (ETT) is utilizing the SGA as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided advancement of an Aintree catheter (airway exchange catheter), and exchange of the SGA for an ETT. In this prospective randomized study, we compared two SGA devices in facilitating this exchange. Subjects were randomized to receive either the i-gel® or LMA® Supreme™ SGA. The SGA was placed and an Aintree intubation catheter was inserted through the SGA over a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Next, the SGA was removed, leaving the Aintree within the trachea, and an ETT was placed over the Aintree catheter and advanced into the trachea. The i-gel group exhibited shorter time to successful intubation (median, 191 vs. 434 seconds; P = .002). The i-gel group also had fewer study subjects requiring more than one attempt for successful Aintree placement (33% vs. 75%, P = .02). The i-gel group showed superior laryngeal view score (LVS) (6 vs. 4; P = .003). The i-gel SGA achieved a faster time to successful intubation, higher rate of first attempt Aintree placement, and superior LVS.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.