利用叶光谱分析温带森林中的叶片酚类化合物及其吸收特征

IF 10.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Rui Xie , Roshanak Darvishzadeh , Andrew Skidmore , Freek van der Meer
{"title":"利用叶光谱分析温带森林中的叶片酚类化合物及其吸收特征","authors":"Rui Xie ,&nbsp;Roshanak Darvishzadeh ,&nbsp;Andrew Skidmore ,&nbsp;Freek van der Meer","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phenolic compounds constitute an essential part of the plant’s secondary metabolites and play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning, including nutrient cycling and plant defence against biotic and abiotic stressors. Quantifying the phenolic compounds across global biomes is important for monitoring the biological diversity and ecosystem processes. However, our understanding of foliar phenolic compounds remains limited, particularly regarding how they vary among temperate tree species and whether their variation and absorption features can be assessed using spectroscopy at the leaf level. In this study, we examined the relationships between the spectral properties of fresh leaves from temperate tree species and two ecologically important phenolic compounds (i.e., total phenol and tannin). We sampled the leaves of four dominant tree species (i.e., English oak, European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine) across two European temperate forest sites. Continuum removal was applied to the leaf spectra to enhance the assessment of the subtle absorption features that correlate with the phenolic content. Total phenol and tannin concentrations were estimated by comparing the performance of two empirical methods, namely partial least squares regression (PLSR) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR). Our results showed a large range of variation in total phenol and tannin between temperate tree species (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Spectral analysis revealed persistent and distinct phenolic absorption features near 1666 nm in the spectra of English oak, Norway spruce and European beech, whereas Scots pine exhibited a weaker absorption feature near 1653 nm. Regression results showed that both PLSR and GPR accurately estimated total phenol and tannin across temperate tree species, with informative bands for predicting these two traits well-corresponded between the two models utilised. Our results also suggested that total phenol was overall more accurately predicted than tannin regardless of employed methods. The most accurate estimations were achieved using PLSR with the continuum-removed SWIR spectra (total phenol: <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.79, NRMSE=9.95%; tannin: <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.59, NRMSE=14.53%). Testing the models established for individual species or forest types revealed variability in their prediction performances, with these specific models demonstrating lower accuracy (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.47–0.69 and 0.34–0.54 for total phenol and tannin, respectively) compared to the cross-species model. Our study extends the understanding of absorption features of phenolic compounds in common temperate tree species and demonstrates the potential for a generalised spectroscopy model to predict foliar phenolic compounds across temperate forests. These findings provide a foundation for mapping and monitoring phenolic compounds in temperate forests at the canopy level using airborne and spaceborne imaging spectroscopy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271624002120/pdfft?md5=dfd8318b43032764b938281c1c64d4a5&pid=1-s2.0-S0924271624002120-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing foliar phenolic compounds and their absorption features in temperate forests using leaf spectroscopy\",\"authors\":\"Rui Xie ,&nbsp;Roshanak Darvishzadeh ,&nbsp;Andrew Skidmore ,&nbsp;Freek van der Meer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.05.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Phenolic compounds constitute an essential part of the plant’s secondary metabolites and play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning, including nutrient cycling and plant defence against biotic and abiotic stressors. Quantifying the phenolic compounds across global biomes is important for monitoring the biological diversity and ecosystem processes. However, our understanding of foliar phenolic compounds remains limited, particularly regarding how they vary among temperate tree species and whether their variation and absorption features can be assessed using spectroscopy at the leaf level. In this study, we examined the relationships between the spectral properties of fresh leaves from temperate tree species and two ecologically important phenolic compounds (i.e., total phenol and tannin). We sampled the leaves of four dominant tree species (i.e., English oak, European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine) across two European temperate forest sites. Continuum removal was applied to the leaf spectra to enhance the assessment of the subtle absorption features that correlate with the phenolic content. Total phenol and tannin concentrations were estimated by comparing the performance of two empirical methods, namely partial least squares regression (PLSR) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR). Our results showed a large range of variation in total phenol and tannin between temperate tree species (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Spectral analysis revealed persistent and distinct phenolic absorption features near 1666 nm in the spectra of English oak, Norway spruce and European beech, whereas Scots pine exhibited a weaker absorption feature near 1653 nm. Regression results showed that both PLSR and GPR accurately estimated total phenol and tannin across temperate tree species, with informative bands for predicting these two traits well-corresponded between the two models utilised. Our results also suggested that total phenol was overall more accurately predicted than tannin regardless of employed methods. The most accurate estimations were achieved using PLSR with the continuum-removed SWIR spectra (total phenol: <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.79, NRMSE=9.95%; tannin: <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.59, NRMSE=14.53%). Testing the models established for individual species or forest types revealed variability in their prediction performances, with these specific models demonstrating lower accuracy (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>=0.47–0.69 and 0.34–0.54 for total phenol and tannin, respectively) compared to the cross-species model. Our study extends the understanding of absorption features of phenolic compounds in common temperate tree species and demonstrates the potential for a generalised spectroscopy model to predict foliar phenolic compounds across temperate forests. These findings provide a foundation for mapping and monitoring phenolic compounds in temperate forests at the canopy level using airborne and spaceborne imaging spectroscopy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271624002120/pdfft?md5=dfd8318b43032764b938281c1c64d4a5&pid=1-s2.0-S0924271624002120-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271624002120\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271624002120","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酚类化合物是植物次生代谢产物的重要组成部分,在生态系统功能(包括养分循环和植物抵御生物和非生物胁迫)中发挥着至关重要的作用。量化全球生物群落中的酚类化合物对于监测生物多样性和生态系统过程非常重要。然而,我们对叶片酚类化合物的了解仍然有限,特别是关于它们在温带树种之间的差异,以及它们的变化和吸收特征是否可以在叶片水平上使用光谱进行评估。在这项研究中,我们考察了温带树种新鲜叶片的光谱特性与两种生态学上重要的酚类化合物(即总酚和单宁)之间的关系。我们在两个欧洲温带森林地点采集了四个主要树种(即英国橡树、欧洲山毛榉、挪威云杉和苏格兰松树)的叶片样本。对叶片光谱进行了连续去除,以加强对与酚含量相关的细微吸收特征的评估。通过比较两种经验方法(即偏最小二乘回归法(PLSR)和高斯过程回归法(GPR))的性能,估算了总酚和单宁的浓度。结果表明,温带树种之间总酚和单宁的变化范围很大(p < 0.05)。光谱分析显示,在英国橡树、挪威云杉和欧洲山毛榉的光谱中,1666 nm 附近有持续且明显的酚类吸收特征,而苏格兰松在 1653 nm 附近的吸收特征较弱。回归结果表明,PLSR 和 GPR 都能准确估计温带树种的总酚和单宁含量,预测这两种性状的信息带在所使用的两个模型之间有很好的对应关系。我们的结果还表明,无论采用哪种方法,总酚的预测总体上都比单宁更准确。使用去除连续波的 SWIR 光谱的 PLSR 得到的估计结果最为准确(总酚:R2=0.79,NRMSE=9.95%;单宁:R2=0.59,NRMSE=14.53%)。对为单个物种或森林类型建立的模型进行测试后发现,这些模型的预测性能存在差异,与跨物种模型相比,这些特定模型的准确度较低(总酚和单宁的 R2 分别为 0.47-0.69 和 0.34-0.54)。我们的研究扩展了对常见温带树种酚类化合物吸收特征的了解,并证明了通用光谱模型预测温带森林叶片酚类化合物的潜力。这些发现为利用机载和空间成像光谱绘制和监测温带森林树冠层的酚类化合物奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing foliar phenolic compounds and their absorption features in temperate forests using leaf spectroscopy

Phenolic compounds constitute an essential part of the plant’s secondary metabolites and play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning, including nutrient cycling and plant defence against biotic and abiotic stressors. Quantifying the phenolic compounds across global biomes is important for monitoring the biological diversity and ecosystem processes. However, our understanding of foliar phenolic compounds remains limited, particularly regarding how they vary among temperate tree species and whether their variation and absorption features can be assessed using spectroscopy at the leaf level. In this study, we examined the relationships between the spectral properties of fresh leaves from temperate tree species and two ecologically important phenolic compounds (i.e., total phenol and tannin). We sampled the leaves of four dominant tree species (i.e., English oak, European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine) across two European temperate forest sites. Continuum removal was applied to the leaf spectra to enhance the assessment of the subtle absorption features that correlate with the phenolic content. Total phenol and tannin concentrations were estimated by comparing the performance of two empirical methods, namely partial least squares regression (PLSR) and Gaussian processes regression (GPR). Our results showed a large range of variation in total phenol and tannin between temperate tree species (p < 0.05). Spectral analysis revealed persistent and distinct phenolic absorption features near 1666 nm in the spectra of English oak, Norway spruce and European beech, whereas Scots pine exhibited a weaker absorption feature near 1653 nm. Regression results showed that both PLSR and GPR accurately estimated total phenol and tannin across temperate tree species, with informative bands for predicting these two traits well-corresponded between the two models utilised. Our results also suggested that total phenol was overall more accurately predicted than tannin regardless of employed methods. The most accurate estimations were achieved using PLSR with the continuum-removed SWIR spectra (total phenol: R2=0.79, NRMSE=9.95%; tannin: R2=0.59, NRMSE=14.53%). Testing the models established for individual species or forest types revealed variability in their prediction performances, with these specific models demonstrating lower accuracy (R2=0.47–0.69 and 0.34–0.54 for total phenol and tannin, respectively) compared to the cross-species model. Our study extends the understanding of absorption features of phenolic compounds in common temperate tree species and demonstrates the potential for a generalised spectroscopy model to predict foliar phenolic compounds across temperate forests. These findings provide a foundation for mapping and monitoring phenolic compounds in temperate forests at the canopy level using airborne and spaceborne imaging spectroscopy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive. P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields. In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信