维生素 E 杯交联聚乙烯在全髋关节置换术中的应用:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
José María Lamo-Espinosa, Gonzalo Mariscal, Jorge Gómez-Álvarez, Mikel San-Julian
{"title":"维生素 E 杯交联聚乙烯在全髋关节置换术中的应用:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。","authors":"José María Lamo-Espinosa, Gonzalo Mariscal, Jorge Gómez-Álvarez, Mikel San-Julian","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin E cup cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) liners compared with standard polyethylene (PE) liners in total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases was conducted. The evaluated outcomes were radiological parameters, functional scores (Harris Hip Score, Numeric Rating Scale, and Activity Scale from the University of California), and adverse events. Odds ratios and mean differences (MD) were calculated for the dichotomous and continuous variables. Meta-analysis was done using Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 990) were included. VEPE liners showed markedly lower penetration at the last follow-up (MD, -0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.11) and penetration rate at last follow-up (MD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.00) than standard PE liners. However, no notable differences were observed in cup migration, inclination, anteversion, or patient-reported outcomes. The complication rate was not markedly different between the groups (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.73).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This meta-analysis found that while VEPE demonstrated decreased penetration rates in total hip arthroplasty, no differences were observed in patient outcomes or complications compared with standard PE. However, the clinical relevance of penetration rate reduction remains uncertain, given the short follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1153-e1165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin E Cup Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"José María Lamo-Espinosa, Gonzalo Mariscal, Jorge Gómez-Álvarez, Mikel San-Julian\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin E cup cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) liners compared with standard polyethylene (PE) liners in total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases was conducted. The evaluated outcomes were radiological parameters, functional scores (Harris Hip Score, Numeric Rating Scale, and Activity Scale from the University of California), and adverse events. Odds ratios and mean differences (MD) were calculated for the dichotomous and continuous variables. Meta-analysis was done using Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 990) were included. VEPE liners showed markedly lower penetration at the last follow-up (MD, -0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.11) and penetration rate at last follow-up (MD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.00) than standard PE liners. However, no notable differences were observed in cup migration, inclination, anteversion, or patient-reported outcomes. The complication rate was not markedly different between the groups (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.73).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This meta-analysis found that while VEPE demonstrated decreased penetration rates in total hip arthroplasty, no differences were observed in patient outcomes or complications compared with standard PE. However, the clinical relevance of penetration rate reduction remains uncertain, given the short follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1153-e1165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估维生素 E 杯交联聚乙烯(VEPE)衬垫与标准聚乙烯(PE)衬垫在全髋关节置换术中的有效性和安全性:方法:对 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Cochrane Collaboration Library 数据库进行了系统检索。评估的结果包括放射学参数、功能评分(哈里斯髋关节评分、数值评级量表和加利福尼亚大学活动量表)和不良事件。计算了二分变量和连续变量的比值比和平均差(MD)。使用Review Manager进行了Meta分析:结果:共纳入七项随机对照试验(n = 990)。与标准 PE 衬垫相比,VEPE 衬垫在最后一次随访时的穿透率(MD,-0.15;95% 置信区间 [CI],-0.18 至 -0.11)和穿透率(MD,-0.01;95% 置信区间 [CI],-0.01 至 -0.00)明显较低。不过,在髋臼杯移位、倾斜、内翻或患者报告的结果方面没有观察到明显差异。两组的并发症发生率没有明显差异(几率比,1.07;95% CI,0.42 至 2.73):这项荟萃分析发现,虽然 VEPE 降低了全髋关节置换术的穿透率,但与标准 PE 相比,在患者预后或并发症方面未观察到差异。然而,由于随访时间较短,穿透率降低的临床意义仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vitamin E Cup Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Introduction: The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vitamin E cup cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) liners compared with standard polyethylene (PE) liners in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases was conducted. The evaluated outcomes were radiological parameters, functional scores (Harris Hip Score, Numeric Rating Scale, and Activity Scale from the University of California), and adverse events. Odds ratios and mean differences (MD) were calculated for the dichotomous and continuous variables. Meta-analysis was done using Review Manager.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 990) were included. VEPE liners showed markedly lower penetration at the last follow-up (MD, -0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.18 to -0.11) and penetration rate at last follow-up (MD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.00) than standard PE liners. However, no notable differences were observed in cup migration, inclination, anteversion, or patient-reported outcomes. The complication rate was not markedly different between the groups (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.73).

Discussion: This meta-analysis found that while VEPE demonstrated decreased penetration rates in total hip arthroplasty, no differences were observed in patient outcomes or complications compared with standard PE. However, the clinical relevance of penetration rate reduction remains uncertain, given the short follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信