Olesya Baker, Alison Galbraith, Ann Thomas, Robert F LeCates, J Frank Wharam
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对急诊科常客的影响。","authors":"Olesya Baker, Alison Galbraith, Ann Thomas, Robert F LeCates, J Frank Wharam","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Regular users of the emergency department (ED) include both patients who could be better served in lower-acuity settings and those with high-severity conditions. ED use decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but patterns among regular ED users are unknown. To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population, we examined quarterly postpandemic ED utilization among prepandemic regular ED users. Key subgroups included prepandemic ED users with regular visits for (1) low-severity conditions and (2) high-severity conditions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An event study design with COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 4710 regular ED users at baseline and followed their ED utilization for 7 quarters. We used a generalized estimating equations model to compare the relative quarterly percent difference in ED visit rates between the COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first postpandemic quarter was associated with the largest decline in ED visits, at -36.0% (95% CI, -42.0% to -29.3%) per regular ED user overall, -52.2% (95% CI, -69.4% to -25.3%) among high-severity users, and -29.6% (95% CI, -39.8% to -17.8%) among low-severity users. However, use did not statistically differ from expected levels after 5 quarters among all regular ED users, 1 quarter among high-severity users, and 3 quarters among regular low-severity users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial reductions among regular high-severity ED users raise concern for harm from delayed or missed care but did not result in increased high-severity visits later. Nonsustained declines among regular low-severity ED users suggest barriers to and opportunities for redirecting nonurgent ED use to lower-acuity settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on regular emergency department users.\",\"authors\":\"Olesya Baker, Alison Galbraith, Ann Thomas, Robert F LeCates, J Frank Wharam\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Regular users of the emergency department (ED) include both patients who could be better served in lower-acuity settings and those with high-severity conditions. ED use decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but patterns among regular ED users are unknown. To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population, we examined quarterly postpandemic ED utilization among prepandemic regular ED users. Key subgroups included prepandemic ED users with regular visits for (1) low-severity conditions and (2) high-severity conditions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An event study design with COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 4710 regular ED users at baseline and followed their ED utilization for 7 quarters. We used a generalized estimating equations model to compare the relative quarterly percent difference in ED visit rates between the COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first postpandemic quarter was associated with the largest decline in ED visits, at -36.0% (95% CI, -42.0% to -29.3%) per regular ED user overall, -52.2% (95% CI, -69.4% to -25.3%) among high-severity users, and -29.6% (95% CI, -39.8% to -17.8%) among low-severity users. However, use did not statistically differ from expected levels after 5 quarters among all regular ED users, 1 quarter among high-severity users, and 3 quarters among regular low-severity users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial reductions among regular high-severity ED users raise concern for harm from delayed or missed care but did not result in increased high-severity visits later. Nonsustained declines among regular low-severity ED users suggest barriers to and opportunities for redirecting nonurgent ED use to lower-acuity settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89540\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:急诊科(ED)的常客既包括那些可以在低急诊率环境中得到更好服务的患者,也包括那些病情严重的患者。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,急诊室的使用率有所下降,但急诊室常客的使用模式尚不清楚。为了确定 COVID-19 大流行对这一人群的影响,我们对大流行前的常规急诊室使用者在大流行后的季度急诊室使用情况进行了调查。研究设计:研究设计:采用 COVID-19 和历史对照队列的事件研究设计:我们确定了 4710 名基线时经常使用急诊室的患者,并对他们使用急诊室的情况进行了 7 个季度的跟踪调查。我们使用广义估计方程模型比较了 COVID-19 和历史对照队列之间 ED 就诊率的相对季度百分比差异:结果:疫情流行后的第一个季度与急诊室就诊率的最大降幅有关,每个急诊室常客的总体就诊率为-36.0%(95% CI,-42.0% 至 -29.3%),高发人群的就诊率为-52.2%(95% CI,-69.4% 至 -25.3%),低发人群的就诊率为-29.6%(95% CI,-39.8% 至 -17.8%)。然而,在所有经常使用 ED 的人群中,5 个季度后的使用率与预期水平没有统计学差异;在频繁使用 ED 的人群中,1 个季度后的使用率与预期水平没有统计学差异;在低频繁使用 ED 的人群中,3 个季度后的使用率与预期水平没有统计学差异:高严重性急诊室常客使用率的最初下降引起了人们对延误或错过治疗造成伤害的担忧,但并没有导致后来高严重性就诊率的增加。经常使用低严重性急诊室的患者人数并未持续减少,这表明将非急诊急诊室转到低严重性急诊室存在障碍和机会。
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on regular emergency department users.
Objectives: Regular users of the emergency department (ED) include both patients who could be better served in lower-acuity settings and those with high-severity conditions. ED use decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but patterns among regular ED users are unknown. To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population, we examined quarterly postpandemic ED utilization among prepandemic regular ED users. Key subgroups included prepandemic ED users with regular visits for (1) low-severity conditions and (2) high-severity conditions.
Study design: An event study design with COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.
Methods: We identified 4710 regular ED users at baseline and followed their ED utilization for 7 quarters. We used a generalized estimating equations model to compare the relative quarterly percent difference in ED visit rates between the COVID-19 and historic controls cohorts.
Results: The first postpandemic quarter was associated with the largest decline in ED visits, at -36.0% (95% CI, -42.0% to -29.3%) per regular ED user overall, -52.2% (95% CI, -69.4% to -25.3%) among high-severity users, and -29.6% (95% CI, -39.8% to -17.8%) among low-severity users. However, use did not statistically differ from expected levels after 5 quarters among all regular ED users, 1 quarter among high-severity users, and 3 quarters among regular low-severity users.
Conclusions: Initial reductions among regular high-severity ED users raise concern for harm from delayed or missed care but did not result in increased high-severity visits later. Nonsustained declines among regular low-severity ED users suggest barriers to and opportunities for redirecting nonurgent ED use to lower-acuity settings.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.