对胸骨上压力信号进行定量验证,以评估睡眠时的呼吸强度。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Luca Cerina, Gabriele B Papini, Pedro Fonseca, Sebastiaan Overeem, Johannes P van Dijk, Fokke van Meulen, Rik Vullings
{"title":"对胸骨上压力信号进行定量验证,以评估睡眠时的呼吸强度。","authors":"Luca Cerina, Gabriele B Papini, Pedro Fonseca, Sebastiaan Overeem, Johannes P van Dijk, Fokke van Meulen, Rik Vullings","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ad4c35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Intra-esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the recommended gold standard to quantify respiratory effort during sleep, but used to limited extent in clinical practice due to multiple practical drawbacks. Respiratory inductance plethysmography belts (RIP) in conjunction with oronasal airflow are the accepted substitute in polysomnographic systems (PSG) thanks to a better usability, although they are partial views on tidal volume and flow rather than true respiratory effort and are often used without calibration. In their place, the pressure variations measured non-invasively at the suprasternal notch (SSP) may provide a better measure of effort. However, this type of sensor has been validated only for respiratory events in the context of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). We aim to provide an extensive verification of the suprasternal pressure signal against RIP belts and Pes, covering both normal breathing and respiratory events.<i>Approach.</i>We simultaneously acquired suprasternal (207) and esophageal pressure (20) signals along with RIP belts during a clinical PSG of 207 participants. In each signal, we detected breaths with a custom algorithm, and evaluated the SSP in terms of detection quality, breathing rate estimation, and similarity of breathing patterns against RIP and Pes. Additionally, we examined how the SSP signal may diverge from RIP and Pes in presence of respiratory events scored by a sleep technician.<i>Main results.</i>The SSP signal proved to be a reliable substitute for both esophageal pressure (Pes) and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) in terms of breath detection, with sensitivity and positive predictive value exceeding 75%, and low error in breathing rate estimation. The SSP was also consistent with Pes (correlation of 0.72, similarity 80.8%) in patterns of increasing pressure amplitude that are common in OSA.<i>Significance.</i>This work provides a quantitative analysis of suprasternal pressure sensors for respiratory effort measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative validation of the suprasternal pressure signal to assess respiratory effort during sleep.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Cerina, Gabriele B Papini, Pedro Fonseca, Sebastiaan Overeem, Johannes P van Dijk, Fokke van Meulen, Rik Vullings\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6579/ad4c35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Intra-esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the recommended gold standard to quantify respiratory effort during sleep, but used to limited extent in clinical practice due to multiple practical drawbacks. Respiratory inductance plethysmography belts (RIP) in conjunction with oronasal airflow are the accepted substitute in polysomnographic systems (PSG) thanks to a better usability, although they are partial views on tidal volume and flow rather than true respiratory effort and are often used without calibration. In their place, the pressure variations measured non-invasively at the suprasternal notch (SSP) may provide a better measure of effort. However, this type of sensor has been validated only for respiratory events in the context of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). We aim to provide an extensive verification of the suprasternal pressure signal against RIP belts and Pes, covering both normal breathing and respiratory events.<i>Approach.</i>We simultaneously acquired suprasternal (207) and esophageal pressure (20) signals along with RIP belts during a clinical PSG of 207 participants. In each signal, we detected breaths with a custom algorithm, and evaluated the SSP in terms of detection quality, breathing rate estimation, and similarity of breathing patterns against RIP and Pes. Additionally, we examined how the SSP signal may diverge from RIP and Pes in presence of respiratory events scored by a sleep technician.<i>Main results.</i>The SSP signal proved to be a reliable substitute for both esophageal pressure (Pes) and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) in terms of breath detection, with sensitivity and positive predictive value exceeding 75%, and low error in breathing rate estimation. The SSP was also consistent with Pes (correlation of 0.72, similarity 80.8%) in patterns of increasing pressure amplitude that are common in OSA.<i>Significance.</i>This work provides a quantitative analysis of suprasternal pressure sensors for respiratory effort measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad4c35\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad4c35","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观食道内压(Pes)测量是量化睡眠时呼吸强度的黄金标准,但由于存在多种实际缺陷,在临床实践中的应用非常有限。呼吸电感 胸廓描记带 (RIP) 与口鼻气流相结合,因其更好的实用性而成为多导睡眠图系统 (PSG) 中公认的 替代品,尽管 它们只是对潮气量和流量的部分观察,而不是真实的呼吸努力,而且 通常未经校准就使用。取而代之的是,在胸骨上切迹(SSP)处无创测量的压力变化可以更好地测量呼吸强度。然而,这种传感器仅在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症(OSA)的呼吸事件中得到验证。我们的目标是对胸骨上压力信号与 RIP 腰带和 Pes 进行广泛验证,涵盖正常呼吸和呼吸事件。方法 在对 207 名参与者进行临床 PSG 时,我们同时采集了胸骨上压力信号(207 个)和食管压力信号(20 个)以及 RIP 腰带信号 。在每个信号中,我们使用定制算法检测呼吸,并从检测质量、呼吸频率 估计以及呼吸模式与 RIP 和 Pes 的相似性等方面对 SSP 进行评估。此外,我们还研究了在睡眠技师对呼吸事件进行评分的情况下,SSP 信号与 RIP 和 Pes 信号的差异。主要结果 在呼吸检测方面,SSP 信号被证明 是食管压力(Pes)和呼吸电感 胸透(RIP)的可靠替代品,灵敏度和阳性 预测值超过 75%,呼吸频率估计误差小。SSP与Pes(相关性为0.72,相似性为80.8%)在OSA常见的压力振幅增大模式上也是一致的。意义 本研究对胸骨上压力传感器的呼吸强度测量进行了定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative validation of the suprasternal pressure signal to assess respiratory effort during sleep.

Objective.Intra-esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the recommended gold standard to quantify respiratory effort during sleep, but used to limited extent in clinical practice due to multiple practical drawbacks. Respiratory inductance plethysmography belts (RIP) in conjunction with oronasal airflow are the accepted substitute in polysomnographic systems (PSG) thanks to a better usability, although they are partial views on tidal volume and flow rather than true respiratory effort and are often used without calibration. In their place, the pressure variations measured non-invasively at the suprasternal notch (SSP) may provide a better measure of effort. However, this type of sensor has been validated only for respiratory events in the context of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). We aim to provide an extensive verification of the suprasternal pressure signal against RIP belts and Pes, covering both normal breathing and respiratory events.Approach.We simultaneously acquired suprasternal (207) and esophageal pressure (20) signals along with RIP belts during a clinical PSG of 207 participants. In each signal, we detected breaths with a custom algorithm, and evaluated the SSP in terms of detection quality, breathing rate estimation, and similarity of breathing patterns against RIP and Pes. Additionally, we examined how the SSP signal may diverge from RIP and Pes in presence of respiratory events scored by a sleep technician.Main results.The SSP signal proved to be a reliable substitute for both esophageal pressure (Pes) and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) in terms of breath detection, with sensitivity and positive predictive value exceeding 75%, and low error in breathing rate estimation. The SSP was also consistent with Pes (correlation of 0.72, similarity 80.8%) in patterns of increasing pressure amplitude that are common in OSA.Significance.This work provides a quantitative analysis of suprasternal pressure sensors for respiratory effort measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信