败血症患者舌下微循环的预后价值:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1177/08850666241253800
Aling Tang, Yi Shi, Qingqing Dong, Sihui Wang, Yao Ge, Chenyan Wang, Zhimin Gong, Weizhen Zhang, Wei Chen
{"title":"败血症患者舌下微循环的预后价值:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Aling Tang, Yi Shi, Qingqing Dong, Sihui Wang, Yao Ge, Chenyan Wang, Zhimin Gong, Weizhen Zhang, Wei Chen","doi":"10.1177/08850666241253800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the relationship between sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis. <b>Data sources:</b> The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies published from January 2003 to November 2023. <b>Study selection:</b> Clinical studies examining sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis were included. <b>Data extraction:</b> Sublingual microcirculation indices included the microvascular blood index (MFI), total vascular density (TVD), perfusion vascular density (PVD), perfusion vascular vessel (PPV), and heterogeneity index (HI). Prognostic outcomes included mortality and severity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. The ability of the small vessel PPV (PPVs) to predict sepsis-related mortality was analyzed based on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, pooled sensitivity, and pooled specificity. <b>Data synthesis:</b> Twenty-five studies involving 1750 subjects were included. The TVD (95% CI 0.11-0.39), PVD (95% CI 0.42-0.88), PPV (95% CI 6.63-13.83), and MFI (95% CI 0.13-0.6) of the survival group were greater than those of the nonsurvival group. The HI in the survival group was lower than that in the nonsurvival group (95% CI -0.49 to -0.03). The TVD (95% CI 0.41-0.83), PVD (95% CI 0.83-1.17), PPV (95% CI 14.49-24.9), and MFI (95% CI 0.25-0.66) of the nonsevere group were greater than those of the severe group. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in TVD between the survival group and the nonsurvival group in the small vessel subgroup. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.88. <b>Conclusions:</b> Sublingual microcirculation was worse among patients who died and patients with severe sepsis than among patients who survived and patients with nonsevere sepsis. PPV has a good predictive value for the mortality of sepsis patients. This study was recorded in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023486349).</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1221-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of Sublingual Microcirculation in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aling Tang, Yi Shi, Qingqing Dong, Sihui Wang, Yao Ge, Chenyan Wang, Zhimin Gong, Weizhen Zhang, Wei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241253800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the relationship between sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis. <b>Data sources:</b> The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies published from January 2003 to November 2023. <b>Study selection:</b> Clinical studies examining sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis were included. <b>Data extraction:</b> Sublingual microcirculation indices included the microvascular blood index (MFI), total vascular density (TVD), perfusion vascular density (PVD), perfusion vascular vessel (PPV), and heterogeneity index (HI). Prognostic outcomes included mortality and severity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. The ability of the small vessel PPV (PPVs) to predict sepsis-related mortality was analyzed based on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, pooled sensitivity, and pooled specificity. <b>Data synthesis:</b> Twenty-five studies involving 1750 subjects were included. The TVD (95% CI 0.11-0.39), PVD (95% CI 0.42-0.88), PPV (95% CI 6.63-13.83), and MFI (95% CI 0.13-0.6) of the survival group were greater than those of the nonsurvival group. The HI in the survival group was lower than that in the nonsurvival group (95% CI -0.49 to -0.03). The TVD (95% CI 0.41-0.83), PVD (95% CI 0.83-1.17), PPV (95% CI 14.49-24.9), and MFI (95% CI 0.25-0.66) of the nonsevere group were greater than those of the severe group. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in TVD between the survival group and the nonsurvival group in the small vessel subgroup. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.88. <b>Conclusions:</b> Sublingual microcirculation was worse among patients who died and patients with severe sepsis than among patients who survived and patients with nonsevere sepsis. PPV has a good predictive value for the mortality of sepsis patients. This study was recorded in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023486349).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1221-1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241253800\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241253800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究舌下微循环与败血症预后的关系:研究舌下微循环与败血症预后的关系。数据来源检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)数据库,以确定2003年1月至2023年11月期间发表的研究。研究选择:纳入研究舌下微循环和败血症预后的临床研究。数据提取:舌下微循环指数包括微血管血液指数(MFI)、总血管密度(TVD)、灌注血管密度(PVD)、灌注血管(PPV)和异质性指数(HI)。预后结果包括死亡率和严重程度。漏斗图和Egger检验用于检测发表偏倚。根据汇总接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)、汇总灵敏度和汇总特异性分析了小血管PPV(PPVs)预测脓毒症相关死亡率的能力。数据综合:共纳入 25 项研究,涉及 1750 名受试者。存活组的 TVD(95% CI 0.11-0.39)、PVD(95% CI 0.42-0.88)、PPV(95% CI 6.63-13.83)和 MFI(95% CI 0.13-0.6)均高于非存活组。存活组的 HI 低于非存活组(95% CI -0.49--0.03)。非重症组的 TVD(95% CI 0.41-0.83)、PVD(95% CI 0.83-1.17)、PPV(95% CI 14.49-24.9)和 MFI(95% CI 0.25-0.66)均高于重症组。亚组分析显示,在小血管亚组中,存活组和非存活组的 TVD 没有明显差异。SROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.88。结论死亡患者和重症脓毒症患者的舌下微循环比存活患者和非重症脓毒症患者更差。PPV 对脓毒症患者的死亡率有很好的预测价值。本研究已在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42023486349)上登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Value of Sublingual Microcirculation in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis. Data sources: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify studies published from January 2003 to November 2023. Study selection: Clinical studies examining sublingual microcirculation and the prognosis of sepsis were included. Data extraction: Sublingual microcirculation indices included the microvascular blood index (MFI), total vascular density (TVD), perfusion vascular density (PVD), perfusion vascular vessel (PPV), and heterogeneity index (HI). Prognostic outcomes included mortality and severity. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. The ability of the small vessel PPV (PPVs) to predict sepsis-related mortality was analyzed based on the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, pooled sensitivity, and pooled specificity. Data synthesis: Twenty-five studies involving 1750 subjects were included. The TVD (95% CI 0.11-0.39), PVD (95% CI 0.42-0.88), PPV (95% CI 6.63-13.83), and MFI (95% CI 0.13-0.6) of the survival group were greater than those of the nonsurvival group. The HI in the survival group was lower than that in the nonsurvival group (95% CI -0.49 to -0.03). The TVD (95% CI 0.41-0.83), PVD (95% CI 0.83-1.17), PPV (95% CI 14.49-24.9), and MFI (95% CI 0.25-0.66) of the nonsevere group were greater than those of the severe group. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in TVD between the survival group and the nonsurvival group in the small vessel subgroup. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.88. Conclusions: Sublingual microcirculation was worse among patients who died and patients with severe sepsis than among patients who survived and patients with nonsevere sepsis. PPV has a good predictive value for the mortality of sepsis patients. This study was recorded in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023486349).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信